Marshall Daniel J, Gower Amy L, Katz Mira L, Bauermeister José A, Shoben Abigail B, Reiter Paul L
College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 3;27:e64668. doi: 10.2196/64668.
Young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men have been referred to as a "hard-to-reach" or "hidden" community in terms of recruiting for research studies. With widespread internet use among this group and young adults in general, web-based avenues represent an important approach for reaching and recruiting members of this community. However, little is known about how participants recruited from various web-based sources may differ from one another.
This study aimed to determine how young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men recruited from various web-based sources differ from one another in terms of participant characteristics and study engagement.
Data were collected as part of a randomized controlled trial of Outsmart HPV, a web-based human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination intervention for young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. From 2019 to 2021, we recruited young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in the United States who were aged 18-25 years and not vaccinated against HPV (n=1227) through various web-based avenues. We classified each participant as being recruited from either (1) social media (eg, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat), (2) a dating app (eg, Grindr, Scruff), or (3) some other digital recruitment source (eg, existing research panel, university-based organization). Analyses compared participants from these 3 groups on demographic and health-related characteristics and metrics involving study engagement.
Most demographic and health-related characteristics differed by web-based recruitment source, including race or ethnicity (P<.001), relationship status (P<.001), education level (P<.001), employment status (P<.001), sexual self-identity (P<.001), health insurance status (P<.001), disclosure of sexual orientation (P=.048), and connectedness to the LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer) community (P<.001) The type of device used by participants during study enrollment also differed across groups, with smartphone use higher among participants recruited via dating apps (n=660, 96.6%) compared to those recruited via social media (n=318, 78.9%) or other digital sources (n=85, 60.3%; P<.001). Participants recruited via social media were more likely than those recruited via dating apps to complete follow-up surveys at 3 different timepoints (odds ratios 1.52-2.09, P=.001-.008). These participants also spent a longer amount of time viewing intervention content about HPV vaccination (3.14 minutes vs 2.67 minutes; P=.02).
We were able to recruit a large national sample of young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men for a web-based HPV vaccination intervention via multiple methodologies. Participants differed on a range of demographic and health-related characteristics, as well as metrics related to study engagement, based on whether they were recruited from social media, a dating app, or some other digital recruitment source. Findings highlight key issues and considerations that can help researchers better plan and customize future web-based recruitment efforts of young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04032106; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04032106.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/16294.
在招募参与研究时,年轻的男同性恋者、双性恋者以及其他与男性发生性行为的男性群体被视为“难以触及”或“隐蔽”的群体。鉴于该群体以及普通年轻人普遍广泛使用互联网,基于网络的途径成为接触和招募该群体成员的重要方式。然而,对于从不同网络来源招募的参与者之间可能存在的差异,我们知之甚少。
本研究旨在确定从不同网络来源招募的年轻男同性恋者、双性恋者以及其他与男性发生性行为的男性在参与者特征和研究参与度方面有何不同。
作为“智胜HPV”随机对照试验的一部分收集数据,“智胜HPV”是一项针对年轻男同性恋者、双性恋者以及其他与男性发生性行为的男性的基于网络的人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种干预措施。2019年至2021年期间,我们通过各种网络途径在美国招募了年龄在18 - 25岁且未接种HPV疫苗的年轻男同性恋者、双性恋者以及其他与男性发生性行为的男性(n = 1227)。我们将每位参与者分类为从以下来源招募:(1)社交媒体(如脸书、照片墙、阅后即焚),(2)约会应用程序(如Grindr、Scruff),或(3)其他数字招募来源(如现有的研究小组、大学组织)。分析比较了这三组参与者在人口统计学和健康相关特征以及涉及研究参与度的指标方面的差异。
大多数人口统计学和健康相关特征因网络招募来源而异,包括种族或族裔(P <.001)、恋爱状况(P <.001)、教育水平(P <.001)、就业状况(P <.001)、性自我认同(P <.001)、健康保险状况(P <.001)、性取向披露情况(P = 0.048)以及与 LGBTQ(女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者、酷儿)社区的联系程度(P <.001)。在研究入组期间参与者使用的设备类型在各组之间也有所不同,与通过社交媒体招募的参与者(n = 318,78.9%)或其他数字来源招募的参与者(n = 85,60.3%)相比,通过约会应用程序招募的参与者中智能手机使用率更高(n = 660,96.6%;P <.001)。与通过约会应用程序招募的参与者相比,通过社交媒体招募的参与者更有可能在3个不同时间点完成随访调查(优势比1.52 - 2.09,P = 0.001 - 0.008)。这些参与者观看关于HPV疫苗接种的干预内容的时间也更长(3.14分钟对2.67分钟;P = 0.02)。
我们能够通过多种方法为一项基于网络的HPV疫苗接种干预措施招募到大量来自美国的年轻男同性恋者、双性恋者以及其他与男性发生性行为的男性的全国性样本。根据参与者是从社交媒体、约会应用程序还是其他数字招募来源招募的,他们在一系列人口统计学和健康相关特征以及与研究参与度相关的指标方面存在差异。研究结果突出了一些关键问题和注意事项,可帮助研究人员更好地规划和定制未来针对年轻男同性恋者、双性恋者以及其他与男性发生性行为的男性的基于网络的招募工作。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04032106;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04032106。
国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):RR2 - 10.2196/16294。