Suppr超能文献

男男性行为者与物质使用:基于场所的抽样与社交网络应用程序抽样的比较。

Young Men Who Have Sex With Men and Substance Use: A Comparison of Venue-Based Sampling and Geosocial Networking Application Sampling.

机构信息

School of Social Work, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.

Dominguez Hills, California State University, Carson, California, USA.

出版信息

J Homosex. 2024 Apr 15;71(5):1163-1176. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2022.2161086. Epub 2023 Jan 11.

Abstract

To compare the demographics, sexual risk behaviors, and substance use characteristics of two probability samples of young men who have sex with men (YMSM): one recruited using a geosocial networking application (GSNA) and one recruited using venues. In 2017 and 2018, a cross-sectional online survey was utilized with a sample of 122 YMSM recruited in Los Angeles, CA. Recruitment procedures included both venue-based (n = 68) and GSNA-based probability sampling (n = 54). Sample substance use, sexual risk behaviors (e.g., unprotected sex at last encounter), and demographics were compared using chi-square tests and -tests. The samples significantly differed in demographics characteristics (e.g., race, education, employment, outness). Samples did not significantly differ in sexual risk variables. Regressions indicated significant differences (higher in the venue sample) in substance use (marijuana, prescription drugs, alcohol, and poppers) between the two samples. Results indicate that recruitment method impacts demographics and substance use prevalence levels for YMSM. GSNA- based recruitment appears to recruit samples from a broader range of social demographics. GSNA-based methods may be especially applicable to areas in which venues are not readily accessible (e.g., rural areas), allowing social research with the most marginalized sexual minority populations.

摘要

比较了两个男男性行为者(MSM)概率样本的人口统计学、性风险行为和物质使用特征:一个是通过地理社交网络应用程序(GSNA)招募的,另一个是通过场所招募的。2017 年和 2018 年,利用洛杉矶的 122 名 MSM 进行了一项横断面在线调查。招募程序包括基于场所(n=68)和基于 GSNA 的概率抽样(n=54)。使用卡方检验和 t 检验比较了样本的物质使用、性风险行为(例如,最后一次接触时未使用保护措施)和人口统计学特征。样本在人口统计学特征(例如种族、教育、就业、公开程度)上存在显著差异。样本在性风险变量上没有显著差异。回归分析表明,两个样本之间在物质使用(大麻、处方药物、酒精和 poppers)方面存在显著差异(场所样本更高)。结果表明,招募方法会影响 MSM 的人口统计学特征和物质使用流行水平。基于 GSNA 的招募似乎可以从更广泛的社会人口统计学中招募样本。基于 GSNA 的方法可能特别适用于场所不易到达的地区(例如农村地区),从而可以对最边缘化的性少数群体进行社会研究。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验