Suppr超能文献

费萨尔国王大学医学院医学生参与本科研究活动的感知障碍:沙特阿拉伯视角

Perceived barriers towards participation in undergraduate research activities among medical students at Alfaisal University-College of Medicine: A Saudi Arabian perspective.

作者信息

Kharraz Razan, Hamadah Reem, AlFawaz Danah, Attasi Jalila, Obeidat Akef S, Alkattan Wael, Abu-Zaid Ahmed

机构信息

a Alfaisal University , Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2016;38 Suppl 1:S12-8. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1142507.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The importance of undergraduate research (UR) to students is well acknowledged in literature; however, little is known about its perceived barriers. The aim of study is to explore the perceived barriers toward participation in UR activities among students at Alfaisal University-College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

An online, anonymous, cross-sectional, self-rating survey was administered. A two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the average five-point Likert scale responses between male and female students.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and twenty-one students (n = 221/350) participated in the survey with a 63.1% response rate. The percentage of participation in UR significantly differed by gender (males vs. females: 68.6% vs. 45.4%; p < 0.0005, Chi-square test). The top three barriers toward participation in UR were "lack of time" (77.4%), "lack of formal UR courses in curriculum" (76%) and "lack of UR mentors" (70.1%). Statistically significant differences of means were identified between male and female students regarding the following statements: "lack of supervising research mentors" (p < 0.01), "lack of interest in research" (p < 0.04), "lack of finding same-gender research mentor" (p < 0.00) and "lack of UR opportunities" (p < 0.00).

CONCLUSION

Our results were fairly comparable to the Western studies. Medical educators should carefully look into all UR barriers and consider implementing applicable solutions.

摘要

背景

本科研究(UR)对学生的重要性在文献中已得到充分认可;然而,对于其感知到的障碍却知之甚少。本研究的目的是探讨沙特阿拉伯阿费萨尔大学医学院学生参与本科研究活动的感知障碍。

方法

进行了一项在线、匿名、横断面、自评调查。采用双尾曼-惠特尼U检验比较男女生在五点李克特量表上的平均反应。

结果

221名学生(n = 221/350)参与了调查,回复率为63.1%。参与本科研究的比例在性别上有显著差异(男生与女生:68.6%对45.4%;p < 0.0005,卡方检验)。参与本科研究的前三大障碍是“时间不足”(77.4%)、“课程中缺乏正式的本科研究课程”(76%)和“缺乏本科研究导师”(70.1%)。在以下陈述方面,男女生之间存在统计学上的显著均值差异:“缺乏指导研究的导师”(p < 0.01)、“对研究缺乏兴趣”(p < 0.04)、“难以找到同性别的研究导师”(p < 0.00)和“缺乏本科研究机会”(p < 0.00)。

结论

我们的结果与西方研究相当可比。医学教育工作者应仔细研究所有本科研究障碍,并考虑实施适用的解决方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验