• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人学习风格偏好与记忆策略运用之间的关系

The Relationship between Learning Style Preferences and Memory Strategy use in Adults.

作者信息

Dirette Diane Powers, Anderson Michele A

机构信息

a Department of Occupational Therapy , Western Michigan University , Kalamazoo , MI , USA.

b Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology , Western Michigan University , Kalamazoo , MI , USA.

出版信息

Occup Ther Health Care. 2016 Jul;30(3):245-54. doi: 10.3109/07380577.2015.1138015. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

DOI:10.3109/07380577.2015.1138015
PMID:26984591
Abstract

Deficits in working memory are pervasive, resistant to remediation and significantly impact a persons ability to perform activities of daily living. Internal strategies are effective for improving working memory. Learning style preferences may influence the use of various internal working memory strategies. This study compares the use of internal working memory strategies among four different learning style preferences; converger, diverger, assimilator and accommodator. A non-experimental group design was used to compare the use of internal working memory strategies and learning style preferences among 110 adults. There were some significant differences in the types of strategies used according to learning style preferences. Knowing the learning style preference of clients may help occupational therapists better tailor cognitive rehabilitation treatments to meet the client's needs.

摘要

工作记忆缺陷普遍存在,难以矫正,且会显著影响一个人进行日常生活活动的能力。内部策略对改善工作记忆有效。学习风格偏好可能会影响各种内部工作记忆策略的使用。本研究比较了四种不同学习风格偏好(聚合型、发散型、同化型和顺应型)的人群对内部工作记忆策略的使用情况。采用非实验性组设计,比较了110名成年人对内部工作记忆策略的使用情况和学习风格偏好。根据学习风格偏好,所使用的策略类型存在一些显著差异。了解客户的学习风格偏好可能有助于职业治疗师更好地定制认知康复治疗方案,以满足客户的需求。

相似文献

1
The Relationship between Learning Style Preferences and Memory Strategy use in Adults.成人学习风格偏好与记忆策略运用之间的关系
Occup Ther Health Care. 2016 Jul;30(3):245-54. doi: 10.3109/07380577.2015.1138015. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
2
Learning style preferences of Australian health science students.澳大利亚健康科学专业学生的学习风格偏好。
J Allied Health. 2010 Summer;39(2):95-103.
3
Comparison of pediatric resident and faculty learning styles: implications for medical education.儿科住院医师与教员学习风格的比较:对医学教育的启示
Am J Med Sci. 1996 Nov;312(5):214-8. doi: 10.1097/00000441-199611000-00004.
4
Role of learning potential in cognitive remediation: Construct and predictive validity.学习潜能在认知康复中的作用:结构效度与预测效度。
Schizophr Res. 2016 Mar;171(1-3):117-24. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.01.044. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
5
Learning style analysis in surgical training.外科培训中的学习风格分析
Am Surg. 1985 Sep;51(9):494-6.
6
Distribution of learning styles and preferences for learning environment characteristics among Emergency Medical Care Assistants (EMCAs) in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省紧急医疗护理助理(EMCA)的学习风格分布以及对学习环境特征的偏好
Prehosp Disaster Med. 1998 Jan-Mar;13(1):55-62.
7
Relationship of learning styles to preferences for instructional activities.
J Dent Educ. 1982 Nov;46(11):652-6.
8
Learning style preferences of occupational therapy students.职业治疗专业学生的学习风格偏好
Am J Occup Ther. 1978 Mar;32(3):161-4.
9
Paramedic Learning Style Preferences and Continuing Medical Education Activities: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.护理人员的学习风格偏好与继续医学教育活动:一项横断面调查研究
J Allied Health. 2018 Spring;47(1):51-57.
10
Validity and feasibility of a learning style instrument for brain injury rehabilitation.用于脑损伤康复的学习风格量表的有效性和可行性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Oct;35(21):1783-9. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.753117. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Black Kin Caregivers: Acceptability and Cultural Adaptation of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting Program.黑人亲属照顾者:家庭体检/日常育儿项目的可接受性与文化适应性
Child Adolesc Social Work J. 2022;39(5):607-618. doi: 10.1007/s10560-022-00841-9. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
2
A systematized review of cognitive load theory in health sciences education and a perspective from cognitive neuroscience.健康科学教育中认知负荷理论的系统综述及认知神经科学视角
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Jul 28;9:176. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_643_19. eCollection 2020.
3
Exploring the role of task performance and learning style on prefrontal hemodynamics during a working memory task.
探讨工作记忆任务中任务表现和学习风格对前额叶血液动力学的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 5;13(6):e0198257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198257. eCollection 2018.