Suppr超能文献

电阻抗肌电图检测野生型和mdx小鼠中电肌肉刺激的效果

Electrical Impedance Myography to Detect the Effects of Electrical Muscle Stimulation in Wild Type and Mdx Mice.

作者信息

Li Jia, Yim Sung, Pacheck Adam, Sanchez Benjamin, Rutkove Seward B

机构信息

From the Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Mar 17;11(3):e0151415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151415. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Tools to better evaluate the impact of therapy on nerve and muscle disease are needed. Electrical impedance myography (EIM) is sensitive to neuromuscular disease progression as well as to therapeutic interventions including myostatin inhibition and antisense oligonucleotide-based treatments. Whether the technique identifies the impact of electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) is unknown.

METHODS

Ten wild-type (wt) C57B6 mice and 10 dystrophin-deficient (mdx) mice underwent 2 weeks of 20 min/day EMS on left gastrocnemius and sham stimulation on the right gastrocnemius. Multifrequency EIM data and limb girth were obtained before and at the conclusion of the protocol. Muscle weight, in situ force measurements, and muscle fiber histology were also assessed at the conclusion of the study.

RESULTS

At the time of sacrifice, muscle weight was greater on the EMS-treated side than on the sham-stimulated side (p = 0.018 for wt and p = 0.007 for mdx). Similarly, in wt animals, EIM parameters changed significantly compared to baseline (resistance (p = 0.009), reactance (p = 0.0003) and phase (p = 0.002); these changes were due in part to reductions in the EIM values on the EMS-treated side and elevations on the sham-simulated side. Mdx animals showed analogous but non-significant changes (p = 0.083, p = 0.064, and p = 0.57 for resistance, reactance and phase, respectively). Maximal isometric force trended higher on the stimulated side in wt animals only (p = 0.06). Myofiber sizes in wt animals were also larger on the stimulated side than on the sham-stimulated side (p = 0.034); no significant difference was found in the mdx mice (p = 0.79).

CONCLUSION

EIM is sensitive to stimulation-induced muscle alterations in wt animals; similar trends are also present in mdx mice. The mechanisms by which these EIM changes develop, however, remains uncertain. Possible explanations include longer-term trophic effects and shorter-term osmotic effects.

摘要

目的

需要有能更好评估治疗对神经和肌肉疾病影响的工具。电阻抗肌电图(EIM)对神经肌肉疾病进展以及包括肌生成抑制素抑制和基于反义寡核苷酸的治疗等治疗干预敏感。该技术是否能识别电肌肉刺激(EMS)的影响尚不清楚。

方法

10只野生型(wt)C57B6小鼠和10只肌营养不良蛋白缺陷型(mdx)小鼠,左腓肠肌接受为期2周、每天20分钟的EMS,右腓肠肌接受假刺激。在实验方案开始前和结束时获取多频EIM数据和肢体周长。在研究结束时还评估了肌肉重量、原位力量测量和肌纤维组织学。

结果

处死时,接受EMS治疗一侧的肌肉重量大于接受假刺激一侧(野生型p = 0.018,mdx型p = 0.007)。同样,在野生型动物中,与基线相比,EIM参数有显著变化(电阻(p = 0.009)、电抗(p = 0.0003)和相位(p = 0.002);这些变化部分是由于接受EMS治疗一侧的EIM值降低,而接受假刺激一侧升高。mdx型动物表现出类似但不显著的变化(电阻、电抗和相位分别为p = 0.083、p = 0.064和p = 0.57)。仅在野生型动物中,受刺激一侧的最大等长力有升高趋势(p = 0.06)。野生型动物中受刺激一侧的肌纤维尺寸也大于接受假刺激一侧(p = 0.034);mdx小鼠中未发现显著差异(p = 0.79)。

结论

EIM对野生型动物中刺激诱导的肌肉改变敏感;mdx小鼠中也存在类似趋势。然而,这些EIM变化产生的机制仍不确定。可能的解释包括长期的营养作用和短期的渗透作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb1a/4795734/060df3a439f3/pone.0151415.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验