Read R, Moberly N J, Salter D, Broome M R
Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Mood Disorders Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 Mar;24(2):441-450. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2013. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
The models of mental disorders held by all mental health professionals are implicit in their attitudes and inform all aspects of theory and practice. The present study aims to explore the attitudes of trainee clinical psychologists towards mental disorders by building on a study conducted by Harland et al. () with psychiatrists. In so doing, the present study contributes to an evidence base that can inform the development of clinical training programs and multidisciplinary working.
The Maudsley Attitude Questionnaire was administered in an online survey of trainee clinical psychologists (n = 289).
Analyses of variance revealed main effects of model, and of diagnostic category, and a significant interaction effect between model and diagnostic category. Principal component analysis revealed a biological-psychosocial continuum and cognitive/behavioural and psychodynamic/spiritual dimensions. Comparisons with Harland et al.'s () psychiatrists revealed large differences, particularly in biological and social constructionist model endorsement.
Results suggest that the attitudes of psychologists and psychiatrists continue to sit at opposite ends of a biological-psychosocial continuum. However, an area of consensus regarding psychotherapeutic models was indicated. Training courses can be reassured that strong opinions tended to reflect the evidence base. Future research with similarly large representative samples from different disciplines would allow findings of the current study to be better contextualized. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
The models of mental disorders held by clinical psychologists are implicit in their attitudes and inform all aspects of theory and practice. We found that trainee clinical psychologists continue to favour psychosocial over biological understandings of mental disorders, giving the cognitive, behavioural and psychodynamic models equal value overall, and stronger attitudes were supported by the evidence base. We found that trainee clinical psychologists organized their attitudes around a biological-psychosocial continuum and cognitive/behavioural and psychodynamic/spiritual dimensions. These findings may be useful for those involved in developing clinical training programs and multidisciplinary working because they provide an insight into the attitudes of emerging clinical psychologists.
所有心理健康专业人员持有的精神障碍模型隐含在他们的态度中,并贯穿于理论和实践的各个方面。本研究旨在借鉴哈兰德等人()对精神科医生进行的一项研究,探索实习临床心理学家对精神障碍的态度。通过这样做,本研究为一个证据库做出了贡献,该证据库可为临床培训计划的制定和多学科合作提供参考。
对实习临床心理学家(n = 289)进行在线调查,使用莫兹利态度问卷。
方差分析显示了模型和诊断类别的主效应,以及模型与诊断类别之间的显著交互效应。主成分分析揭示了生物 - 心理 - 社会连续体以及认知/行为和心理动力/精神维度。与哈兰德等人()的精神科医生的比较显示出很大差异,特别是在生物和社会建构主义模型的认可方面。
结果表明,心理学家和精神科医生的态度继续处于生物 - 心理 - 社会连续体的两端。然而,在心理治疗模型方面指出了一个共识领域。培训课程可以放心,强烈的观点往往反映了证据基础。未来对来自不同学科的类似大型代表性样本的研究将使本研究的结果能够更好地融入背景。版权所有© 2016约翰威立父子有限公司。
临床心理学家持有的精神障碍模型隐含在他们的态度中,并贯穿于理论和实践的各个方面。我们发现,实习临床心理学家在对精神障碍的理解上继续倾向于心理社会而非生物方面,总体上给予认知、行为和心理动力模型同等价值,并且更强的态度得到了证据基础的支持。我们发现,实习临床心理学家围绕生物 - 心理 - 社会连续体以及认知/行为和心理动力/精神维度组织他们的态度。这些发现可能对参与制定临床培训计划和多学科合作的人员有用,因为它们提供了对新兴临床心理学家态度的洞察。