Edwards W Brent, Miller Ross H, Derrick Timothy R
Human Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 1N4.
Department of Kinesiology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20745, USA.
J Biomech. 2016 May 3;49(7):1206-1213. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
Mechanical strain plays an important role in skeletal health, and the ability to accurately and noninvasively quantify bone strain in vivo may be used to develop preventive measures that improve bone quality and decrease fracture risk. A non-invasive estimation of bone strain requires combined musculoskeletal - finite element modeling, for which the applied muscle forces are usually obtained from static optimization (SO) methods. In this study, we compared finite element predicted femoral strains in walking using muscle forces obtained from SO to those obtained from forward dynamics (FD) simulation. The general trends in strain distributions were similar between FD and SO derived conditions and both agreed well with previously reported in vivo strain gage measurements. On the other hand, differences in peak maximum (εmax) and minimum (εmin) principal strain magnitudes were as high as 32% between FD (εmax/εmin=945/-1271με) and SO (εmax/εmin=752/-859με). These large differences in strain magnitudes were observed during the first half of stance, where SO predicted lower gluteal muscle forces and virtually no co-contraction of the hip adductors compared to FD. The importance of these results will likely depend on the purpose/application of the modeling procedure. If the goal is to obtain a generalized strain distribution for adaptive bone remodeling algorithms, then traditional SO is likely sufficient. In cases were strain magnitudes are critical, as is the case with fracture risk assessment, bone strain estimation may benefit by including muscle activation and contractile dynamics in SO, or by using FD when practical.
机械应变在骨骼健康中起着重要作用,能够在体内准确且无创地量化骨应变,这可能有助于制定改善骨质量和降低骨折风险的预防措施。对骨应变进行无创估计需要结合肌肉骨骼有限元建模,通常通过静态优化(SO)方法来获取所施加的肌肉力。在本研究中,我们比较了在步行过程中,使用从SO获得的肌肉力与从正向动力学(FD)模拟获得的肌肉力时,有限元预测的股骨应变情况。FD和SO得出的条件下,应变分布的总体趋势相似,并且都与先前报道的体内应变计测量结果高度吻合。另一方面,FD(εmax/εmin=945/-1271με)和SO(εmax/εmin=752/-859με)之间的最大(εmax)和最小(εmin)主应变峰值大小差异高达32%。在站立的前半段观察到这些应变大小的巨大差异,与FD相比,SO预测的臀肌力量较低,且几乎没有髋内收肌的共同收缩。这些结果的重要性可能取决于建模过程的目的/应用。如果目标是为适应性骨重塑算法获得广义应变分布,那么传统的SO可能就足够了。在应变大小至关重要的情况下,如骨折风险评估,通过在SO中纳入肌肉激活和收缩动力学,或者在实际可行时使用FD,骨应变估计可能会受益。