Mudaliar Kumaran, Tetzlaff Michael T, Duvic Madeleine, Ciurea Ana, Hymes Sharon, Milton Denái R, Tsai Kenneth Y, Prieto Victor G, Torres-Cabala Carlos A, Curry Jonathan L
Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030.
Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030.
Hum Pathol. 2016 Apr;50:79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.12.003. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
Newly appearing or changing melanocytic lesions (MLs) are a recently reported toxicity of BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) therapy. Morphologically, MLs associated with BRAFi therapy (BRAFi-MLs) may demonstrate alarming features of melanoma with an epithelioid cell phenotype with notable cytologic atypia. We sought to characterize the clinicopathological and molecular features of BRAFi-MLs. A retrospective review over a 4-year period revealed 20 patients in which 44 MLs (including 11 control nevi) were characterized by histopathology, review of clinical medical records, and immunohistochemical (IHC) studies (with anti-BRAF V600E, anti-BAP1, anti-cyclin D1, and anti-p16); the percentage of IHC+ cells was scored. Of the 20 patients, 3 (15%) whose BRAFi-MLs were biopsied had a second primary cutaneous melanoma. Of the 44 BRAFi-MLs tested, 37 (100%) of 37 MLs available for BRAF V600E testing lacked expression in contrast to 1 (9%) of 11 control nevi (lesions not associated with targeted therapy). A significantly higher level of cyclin D1 expression (>50% IHC+ cells) was more commonly seen in BRAFi-MLs (44%) than in control nevi (9%). No difference in p16 expression in melanocytes was seen between the 2 groups. BRAF mutation status distinctly differs between BRAFi-MLs from melanomas and nevi biopsied in patients who do not receive BRAFi therapy. Morphologically, BRAFi-MLs demonstrate a greater degree of atypia than do control nevi. Furthermore, BRAFi-MLs with coexisting cutaneous keratinocyte toxicity developed during fewer days of targeted therapy. Paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway in BRAF(WT) melanocytes may account for ~15% to 21% of patients developing a second new primary melanoma within a year of starting BRAFi therapy; thus, close clinical surveillance is warranted.
新出现或变化的黑素细胞病变(MLs)是最近报道的BRAF抑制剂(BRAFi)治疗的一种毒性反应。从形态学上看,与BRAFi治疗相关的MLs(BRAFi-MLs)可能表现出具有上皮样细胞表型且伴有明显细胞学异型性的黑色素瘤的警示特征。我们试图对BRAFi-MLs的临床病理和分子特征进行描述。一项为期4年的回顾性研究发现了20例患者,其中44个MLs(包括11个对照痣)通过组织病理学、临床病历回顾以及免疫组化(IHC)研究(使用抗BRAF V600E、抗BAP1、抗细胞周期蛋白D1和抗p16)进行了特征描述;对IHC阳性细胞的百分比进行了评分。在这20例患者中,3例(15%)接受BRAFi-MLs活检的患者患有第二原发性皮肤黑色素瘤。在检测的44个BRAFi-MLs中,37个可进行BRAF V600E检测的MLs中有37个(100%)缺乏表达,相比之下,11个对照痣(与靶向治疗无关的病变)中有1个(9%)缺乏表达。BRAFi-MLs(44%)中细胞周期蛋白D1表达水平显著更高(>50% IHC阳性细胞)的情况比对照痣(9%)更常见。两组之间黑素细胞中p16表达没有差异。接受BRAFi治疗患者的黑色素瘤和痣的BRAFi-MLs的BRAF突变状态明显不同。从形态学上看,BRAFi-MLs比对照痣表现出更大程度的异型性。此外,同时存在皮肤角质形成细胞毒性的BRAFi-MLs在靶向治疗的天数较少时出现。BRAF野生型(BRAF(WT))黑素细胞中MAPK通路的反常激活可能导致约15%至21%的患者在开始BRAFi治疗后一年内发生第二原发性新黑色素瘤;因此,有必要进行密切的临床监测。