Guirguis Lisa M, Nusair Mohammad B
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2016 Mar-Apr;56(2):123-8. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2015.12.007. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
Interactive communication approaches may help to shift pharmacy practice toward more patient-centered care. One example of such an approach is the 3 prime questions (3PQs). Patients' preferences for pharmacists' interactive communication styles were not identified in the literature.
The purpose of this paper was to explore standardized patient (SP) preferences, satisfaction, and perceptions of pharmacists' communication style and changes in pharmacist to standardized patient talk-time ratio.
Mixed methods, before and after evaluation.
SPs were hired from the University of Alberta's Standardized Patient Program, Canada.
Twelve SPs and 10 pharmacists.
SPs were video recorded interacting with the same pharmacists before and after pharmacist training on the 3PQs. SPs participated in an open-ended interview using stimulated recall on videos of their pharmacist encounters.
Explore SP preferences, satisfaction, and perceptions of pharmacists' communication style, in addition to changes in pharmacist to standardized patient talk-time ratio before and after the intervention
Generally SPs were satisfied with pharmacists' interactive communication style post training. Qualitative themes varied with SPs' preference for an interactive approach (58%, i.e., Conversation with Equals, Double Check, and Manageable Information) or traditional approach (33%, i.e., Expected Information, Shouldn't the Pharmacist Know, and Feels Uncomfortable) and improvements in item scores varied by type of prescription. Pharmacists' use of the 3PQs increased patient talk time for scenarios with new chronic and acute medication, though pharmacists still dominated the conversation.
Just over half of SPs preferred an interactive communication style, although a third of SPs preferred a communication style that focused on information provision. Patients had more time to talk in some interactive encounters. Pharmacists may need to be aware of patient expectations when using the 3PQs.
互动交流方式可能有助于推动药学实践向更以患者为中心的护理转变。这种方式的一个例子是3个主要问题(3PQs)。文献中未明确患者对药剂师互动交流风格的偏好。
本文旨在探讨标准化患者(SP)对药剂师交流风格的偏好、满意度和看法,以及药剂师与标准化患者交谈时间比例的变化。
混合方法,前后评估。
从加拿大阿尔伯塔大学标准化患者项目中聘请标准化患者。
12名标准化患者和10名药剂师。
在药剂师接受3PQs培训前后,对标准化患者与同一名药剂师的互动进行录像。标准化患者通过对药剂师问诊视频进行情景回忆参与开放式访谈。
除干预前后药剂师与标准化患者交谈时间比例的变化外,探讨标准化患者对药剂师交流风格的偏好、满意度和看法。
总体而言,标准化患者对培训后药剂师的互动交流风格感到满意。定性主题因标准化患者对互动方式(58%,即平等对话、双重检查和可管理信息)或传统方式(33%,即预期信息、药剂师难道不知道吗、感觉不舒服)的偏好而异,项目得分的提高因处方类型而异。在新的慢性和急性用药场景中,药剂师使用3PQs增加了患者的交谈时间,不过药剂师仍主导着对话。
略超过一半的标准化患者更喜欢互动交流风格,尽管三分之一的标准化患者更喜欢侧重于信息提供的交流风格。在一些互动问诊中患者有更多时间交谈。药剂师在使用3PQs时可能需要了解患者的期望。