• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

混合方法评估:药剂师对与患者互动的互动沟通方法的经验和信念。

Mixed methods evaluation: pharmacists' experiences and beliefs toward an interactive communication approach to patient interactions.

机构信息

University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Jun;83(3):432-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.038. Epub 2011 May 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.038
PMID:21632196
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To characterize pharmacists' experience and explore their beliefs toward an interactive communication technique, the three prime questions (3PQs),where pharmacists ask about patients' understanding of medication's purpose, directions, and monitoring.

METHODS

Mixed method design. Pharmacists were briefly trained and then integrated the 3PQs into their practice for two weeks. Pharmacists recorded their perceptions of patient interactions, completed a survey addressing self-efficacy and role beliefs toward the 3PQs, and participated in a focus group.

RESULTS

Eleven pharmacists participated and the 3PQs were used with 176 patients. Most interactions were under 5min. Pharmacists reported that questions about directions and monitoring were most effective in gathering new information with refills whereas medication purpose question was preferred for new fills. The majority of pharmacists were certain they could use the 3PQs and agreed it was their role. Five themes arose from the qualitative analysis: established communication routines, enhanced patient-pharmacist relationships, good medication history, tailoring of the 3PQs, and impact of pharmacy organization.

CONCLUSION

The 3PQs enabled pharmacists to briefly assess patient medication experiences and tailor education while fostering patient-centered relationships in pharmacy practice.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

While the 3PQs may enhance pharmacists' patient assessment; integration may challenge pharmacists' work routine.

摘要

目的

描述药剂师的经验,并探讨他们对一种互动沟通技巧——三问问题(3PQs)的信念,即药剂师询问患者对药物用途、用法和监测的理解。

方法

混合方法设计。药剂师接受简短培训,然后将 3PQs 融入他们的实践中两周。药剂师记录他们对患者互动的看法,完成一份关于自我效能和对 3PQs 的角色信念的调查,并参加焦点小组。

结果

11 名药剂师参与了研究,3PQs 用于 176 名患者。大多数互动时间不到 5 分钟。药剂师报告说,关于用法和监测的问题在收集新信息方面最有效,而药物用途问题则更适合新处方。大多数药剂师确信他们可以使用 3PQs,并认为这是他们的角色。从定性分析中出现了五个主题:既定的沟通惯例、增强的医患关系、良好的药物史、3PQs 的定制以及药房组织的影响。

结论

3PQs 使药剂师能够简短地评估患者的药物体验,并在培养以患者为中心的关系的同时为患者提供教育。

实践意义

虽然 3PQs 可能增强药剂师对患者的评估,但整合可能会挑战药剂师的工作常规。

相似文献

1
Mixed methods evaluation: pharmacists' experiences and beliefs toward an interactive communication approach to patient interactions.混合方法评估:药剂师对与患者互动的互动沟通方法的经验和信念。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Jun;83(3):432-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.038. Epub 2011 May 31.
2
Standardized patients' preferences for pharmacist interactive communication style: A mixed method approach.标准化患者对药剂师互动沟通风格的偏好:一种混合方法研究
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2016 Mar-Apr;56(2):123-8. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2015.12.007. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
3
Pharmacists' and patients' roles in the pharmacist-patient relationship: are pharmacists and patients reading from the same relationship script?药剂师与患者在医患关系中的角色:药剂师和患者是否遵循相同的关系脚本?
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2007 Mar;3(1):47-69. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2006.03.003.
4
Pharmacists' documentation in patients' hospital health records: issues and educational implications.药剂师在患者医院健康记录中的记录:问题与教育意义。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2010 Apr;18(2):108-15.
5
Do researchers use pharmacists' communication as an outcome measure? A scoping review of pharmacist involvement in diabetes care.研究人员是否将药剂师的沟通作为一项结果指标?对药剂师参与糖尿病护理的范围综述。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2010 Aug;18(4):183-93. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2010.00038.x.
6
Community pharmacists' prescription intervention practices--exploring variations in practice in Norwegian pharmacies.社区药剂师的处方干预实践——探索挪威药店实践中的差异。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010 Mar;6(1):6-17. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2009.03.003. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
7
Physician-patient and pharmacist-patient communication: geriatrics' perceptions and opinions.医患及药剂师与患者的沟通:老年医学的认知与观点。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 May;71(2):265-84. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.01.004. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
8
The medication experience: preliminary evidence of its value for patient education and counseling on chronic medications.用药体验:用于慢性病患者药物教育和咨询的初步证据。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Jun;83(3):443-50. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.02.007. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
9
Using interpersonal perception to characterize pharmacists' and patients' perceptions of the benefits of pharmaceutical care.运用人际感知来描述药剂师和患者对药学服务益处的认知。
Health Commun. 2005;17(1):41-56. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc1701_3.
10
Attitudes of Finnish community pharmacists toward concordance.芬兰社区药剂师对一致性的态度。
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Nov;38(11):1946-53. doi: 10.1345/aph.1E050. Epub 2004 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Community pharmacists' perceptions of their challenges in relation to older adults prescribed psychotropic medications: a focus-group study.社区药剂师对为老年人开具精神药物处方所面临挑战的看法:一项焦点小组研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Dec 31. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01856-1.
2
Management of allergic rhinitis in the community pharmacy: identifying the reasons behind medication self-selection.社区药房中过敏性鼻炎的管理:确定药物自我选择背后的原因。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2018 Jul-Sep;16(3):1332. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2018.03.1332. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
3
How can pharmacists develop patient-pharmacist communication skills? A realist review protocol.
药剂师如何培养医患沟通技巧?一项现实主义综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 23;6(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0396-0.
4
Pharmacists Connect and CARE: Transforming pharmacy customers into patients.药剂师的联系与关怀:将药房顾客转变为患者。
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2014 May;147(3):149-53. doi: 10.1177/1715163514530098.
5
Australian community pharmacists' awareness and practice in supporting secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.澳大利亚社区药剂师在支持心血管疾病二级预防方面的认知和实践。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Dec;35(6):1218-28. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9854-0. Epub 2013 Sep 21.