Suppr超能文献

震慑与敬畏:禁忌词汇对词汇判断和自由回忆的不同影响。

Shock and awe: Distinct effects of taboo words on lexical decision and free recall.

作者信息

Madan Christopher R, Shafer Andrea T, Chan Michelle, Singhal Anthony

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , University of Alberta , Edmonton , AB , Canada.

c Department of Psychology , Boston College , Chestnut Hill , MA , USA.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Apr;70(4):793-810. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1167925. Epub 2016 May 3.

Abstract

Taboo stimuli are highly arousing, but it has been suggested that they also have inherent taboo-specific properties such as tabooness, offensiveness, or shock value. Prior studies have shown that taboo words have slower response times in lexical decision and higher recall probabilities in free recall; however, taboo words often differ from other words on more than just arousal and taboo properties. Here, we replicated both of these findings and conducted detailed item analyses to determine which word properties drive these behavioural effects. We found that lexical-decision performance was best explained by measures of lexical accessibility (e.g., word frequency) and tabooness, rather than arousal, valence, or offensiveness. However, free-recall performance was primarily driven by emotional word properties, and tabooness was the most important emotional word property for model fit. Our results suggest that the processing of taboo words is influenced by distinct sets of factors and by an intrinsic taboo-specific property.

摘要

禁忌刺激具有高度的唤起性,但有人认为它们也具有固有的特定禁忌属性,如禁忌性、冒犯性或震惊价值。先前的研究表明,禁忌词在词汇判断中的反应时间较慢,在自由回忆中的回忆概率较高;然而,禁忌词往往不仅仅在唤起性和禁忌属性方面与其他词不同。在这里,我们重复了这两个发现,并进行了详细的项目分析,以确定哪些词的属性驱动了这些行为效应。我们发现,词汇判断表现最好用词汇可及性(如词频)和禁忌性来解释,而不是唤起性、效价或冒犯性。然而,自由回忆表现主要由情感词属性驱动,禁忌性是模型拟合中最重要的情感词属性。我们的结果表明,禁忌词的处理受到不同因素集和内在特定禁忌属性的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验