Kauschke Christina, Bahn Daniela, Vesker Michael, Schwarzer Gudrun
Department of German Linguistics, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Department of Developmental Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, Gießen, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 26;10:1654. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01654. eCollection 2019.
Emotional valence is predominately conveyed in social interactions by words and facial expressions. The existence of broad biases which favor more efficient processing of positive or negative emotions is still a controversial matter. While so far this question has been investigated separately for each modality, in this narrative review of the literature we focus on valence effects in processing both words and facial expressions. In order to identify the factors underlying positivity and negativity effects, and to uncover whether these effects depend on modality and age, we present and analyze three representative overviews of the literature concerning valence effects in word processing, face processing, and combinations of word and face processing. Our analysis of word processing studies points to a positivity bias or a balanced processing of positive and negative words, whereas the analysis of face processing studies showed the existence of separate positivity and negativity biases depending on the experimental paradigm. The mixed results seem to be a product of the different methods and types of stimuli being used. Interestingly, we found that children exhibit a clear positivity advantage for both word and face processing, indicating similar processing biases in both modalities. Over the course of development, the initial positivity advantage gradually disappears, and in some face processing studies even reverses into a negativity bias. We therefore conclude that there is a need for future research that systematically analyses the impact of age and modality on the emergence of these valence effects. Finally, we discuss possible explanations for the presence of the early positivity advantage and its subsequent decrease.
情绪效价在社交互动中主要通过言语和面部表情来传达。存在倾向于更高效处理积极或消极情绪的广泛偏差这一情况仍然是一个有争议的问题。虽然到目前为止这个问题是针对每种模态分别进行研究的,但在这篇文献综述中,我们关注在处理言语和面部表情时的效价效应。为了确定积极和消极效应背后的因素,并揭示这些效应是否取决于模态和年龄,我们呈现并分析了三篇关于言语处理、面部处理以及言语和面部处理组合中的效价效应的代表性文献综述。我们对言语处理研究的分析指出存在积极偏差或对积极和消极词汇的平衡处理,而对面部处理研究的分析表明,根据实验范式的不同,分别存在积极和消极偏差。这些混合结果似乎是所使用的不同方法和刺激类型的产物。有趣的是,我们发现儿童在言语和面部处理方面都表现出明显的积极优势,这表明在这两种模态中存在相似的处理偏差。在发展过程中,最初的积极优势逐渐消失,并且在一些面部处理研究中甚至转变为消极偏差。因此,我们得出结论,未来需要进行系统分析年龄和模态对这些效价效应出现的影响的研究。最后,我们讨论了早期积极优势存在及其随后下降的可能解释。