McAllister Margaret, Flynn Trudi
School of Nursing and Midwifery, CQ University, Queensland, Australia.
School of Nursing and Midwifery, CQ University, Queensland, Australia.
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Apr;39:122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.01.022. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
To inspire excellent clinicians to become educators, the role of the nurse educator needs to be more fully defined. Capabilities rather than competencies may better describe advanced professional practice.
To develop an effective measure of the multifaceted complexity of the nurse educator role, which will enable nurse educators to (1) self-assess their capability set, (2) identify areas for professional development, and (3) evaluate professional development interventions.
A questionnaire (with 6 subsets) interrogating nurse educator capabilities was developed through wide professional consultation and an expert working group, and evaluated. Statistical analyses investigated internal consistency, internal correlation of items, relationship to professional practice data (also collected via questionnaire), and test-retest reliability of the questionnaire and subsets.
Nurse educators (266) working within universities and health services in Australia and New Zealand.
Analyses resulted in a 93-item Capabilities of Nurse Educators (CONE) questionnaire, with six subsets measuring Teaching Knowledge and Practice, Drawing from Nursing Knowledge, Teaching Relationships, Leadership, Research Orientation and Research Action. The questionnaire and subsets demonstrated internal validity (Cronbach's α ≥ .9). Reliability in this population was supported via significant differences between ranked questionnaire scores in ordinal categories of data collected about professional practice. The 8-week test-retest analysis supported the reliability of the CONE over time and suggested the questionnaire could be useful to evaluate the success of professional development activities.
The CONE questionnaire proved useful for measuring the complex capabilities of nurse educators in the academic and health service contexts studied and may assist educators to self-assess their capability sets and identify areas for professional development. It also shows promise as an evaluation tool for professional development. The utility of CONE as a self-diagnostic tool in career advancement, particularly in novice educators and educators outside Australia, requires further confirmation.
为激励优秀临床医生成为教育工作者,护士教育工作者的角色需要得到更全面的界定。用能力而非胜任力可能能更好地描述高级专业实践。
开发一种有效的方法来衡量护士教育工作者角色多方面的复杂性,这将使护士教育工作者能够:(1)自我评估其能力组合;(2)确定专业发展领域;(3)评估专业发展干预措施。
通过广泛的专业咨询和一个专家工作组,开发了一份询问护士教育工作者能力的问卷(有6个部分),并进行了评估。统计分析调查了内部一致性、项目间的内部相关性、与专业实践数据(也通过问卷收集)的关系以及问卷及其各部分的重测信度。
在澳大利亚和新西兰的大学及卫生服务机构工作的护士教育工作者(266名)。
分析得出了一份包含93个条目的护士教育工作者能力(CONE)问卷,有六个部分,分别衡量教学知识与实践、借鉴护理知识、教学关系、领导力、研究导向和研究行动。该问卷及其各部分显示出内部效度(克朗巴哈α系数≥0.9)。通过在关于专业实践收集的数据的有序类别中,问卷排名分数之间的显著差异,支持了该问卷在这一人群中的信度。为期8周的重测分析支持了CONE随时间的信度,并表明该问卷可用于评估专业发展活动的成效。
CONE问卷被证明对于衡量在所研究的学术和卫生服务环境中护士教育工作者的复杂能力很有用,可能有助于教育工作者自我评估其能力组合并确定专业发展领域。它也有望成为专业发展的评估工具。CONE作为职业发展中自我诊断工具的效用,特别是在新手教育工作者和澳大利亚以外的教育工作者中的效用,需要进一步确认。