• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

勒费夫尔限制型衬垫的中期生存率:166例连续多外科医生系列病例

Midterm Survivorship of the Lefèvre Constrained Liner: A Consecutive Multisurgeon Series of 166 Cases.

作者信息

Clavé Arnaud, Maurer David, Tristan Ludovic, Dubrana Frederic, Lefèvre Christian, Pandit Hemant

机构信息

The Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom; LaTIM, Unité INSERM, Hôpital Morvan, Brest, France.

Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9):1970-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.031. Epub 2016 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.031
PMID:27006147
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Constrained liners are used as part of a salvage procedure to provide stability for patients at high risk for dislocation after a total hip arthroplasty. However, no recent studies exist highlighting their effectiveness and/or limitations.

METHOD

This prospective review included 166 consecutive hip arthroplasties, either primary (27%) or revision (73%), with a unique design of a constrained liner: Lefèvre retentive cup. There were 113 females (69%), and the average age at index surgery was 75.9 years (range, 35-94). The mean follow-up was 6.2 years (range, 0.3-11).

RESULTS

Twenty patients had a reoperation; 10 for infection (4 acute and 6 chronic joint infection) and 10 for cup failure (5 fixation failure, 3 aseptic loosening, and 2 dislocation). Ten-year survivals for cup revision were 89% (CI, 83-94) and 92% (CI, 89-97) for all revision and revision for noninfectious reasons, respectively. When solely evaluating for dislocation, the survival at 10 years was 99% (CI, 97-100). Considering primary and revision cases, 10-year survivals cup revision for aseptic reasons were 92.4% (CI, 84-100) and 92.5% (CI, 87-98), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Lefèvre retentive cup demonstrated excellent 10-year's survivorship. With the rate of aseptic loosening around 2% and a dislocation rate around 1%, the cup is as effective as other available devices and is therefore a cost-effective tool to reduce the risk of dislocation in at-risk patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.

摘要

背景

限制性衬垫作为挽救手术的一部分,用于为全髋关节置换术后脱位高危患者提供稳定性。然而,近期尚无研究突出其有效性和/或局限性。

方法

这项前瞻性研究纳入了166例连续的髋关节置换术,包括初次置换(27%)或翻修手术(73%),采用了一种独特设计的限制性衬垫:勒费弗尔固定杯。其中女性113例(69%),初次手术时的平均年龄为75.9岁(范围35 - 94岁)。平均随访时间为6.2年(范围0.3 - 11年)。

结果

20例患者进行了再次手术;10例因感染(4例急性和6例慢性关节感染),10例因髋臼杯失败(5例固定失败、3例无菌性松动和2例脱位)。髋臼杯翻修的10年生存率,所有翻修病例为89%(可信区间,83 - 94),非感染原因翻修病例为92%(可信区间,89 - 97)。仅评估脱位情况时,10年生存率为99%(可信区间,97 - 100)。考虑初次和翻修病例,无菌性原因髋臼杯翻修的10年生存率分别为92.4%(可信区间,84 - 100)和92.5%(可信区间,87 - 98)。

结论

勒费弗尔固定杯显示出优异的10年生存率。无菌性松动率约为2%,脱位率约为1%,该髋臼杯与其他现有装置效果相当,因此是降低髋关节置换术高危患者脱位风险的一种经济有效的工具。

相似文献

1
Midterm Survivorship of the Lefèvre Constrained Liner: A Consecutive Multisurgeon Series of 166 Cases.勒费夫尔限制型衬垫的中期生存率:166例连续多外科医生系列病例
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9):1970-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.031. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
2
Long-term survival of the Lefèvre retentive cup: 12-year follow-up analysis of 466 consecutive cases.Lefèvre 保持器的长期存留率:466 例连续病例的 12 年随访分析。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Apr;108(2):103173. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103173. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
3
Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients at High Risk for Dislocation.初次全髋关节置换术中用于脱位高危患者的双动髋臼杯
Surg Technol Int. 2017 Jul 25;30:251-258.
4
Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty with a dual-mobility cup. Matched case-control study (16 cases vs. 48 controls).翻修全髋关节置换术后双动杯脱位的危险因素:配对病例对照研究(16 例与 48 例对照)。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Nov;105(7):1303-1309. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 May 29.
5
Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.巨型髋臼组件在髋关节翻修术中的固定、存活和脱位。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Mar 20;95(6):543-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00758.
6
Dual mobility cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: dislocation rate and survival after 5 years.翻修全髋关节置换术中双动杯:5年脱位率及生存率
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Sep;101(5):577-81. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
7
Course of dislocated posterior hip arthroplasty: A continuous 232-patient series at a mean 10 years' follow up (range, 1-22 years).髋关节后脱位全髋关节置换术的病程:一项连续 232 例患者的 10 年平均随访(范围,1-22 年)研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 May;104(3):325-331. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.10.017. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
8
Dual-mobility cups for revision due to instability are associated with a low rate of re-revisions due to dislocation: 228 patients from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.双动杯翻修术治疗因不稳定导致的翻修,脱位导致再次翻修的比例较低:来自瑞典髋关节置换登记处的 228 例患者。
Acta Orthop. 2012 Dec;83(6):566-71. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.742395. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
9
The focally constrained liner is a reasonable option for revision of unstable total hip arthroplasty.对于不稳定全髋关节置换术的翻修,局部受限衬垫是一种合理的选择。
Int Orthop. 2016 Nov;40(11):2239-2245. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3082-2. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
10
The Lefèvre retentive cup compared with the dual mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty revision for dislocation.在全髋关节翻修术治疗脱位方面,Lefèvre 保持性杯与双动杯的比较。
Int Orthop. 2020 Sep;44(9):1661-1667. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04601-1. Epub 2020 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Survival Analysis and Failure Modes of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Cemented Semi-Retentive Acetabular Cup.使用骨水泥半固定髋臼杯的全髋关节置换术的生存分析和失败模式
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 5;12(24):7506. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247506.
2
Removing Cemented Dual Mobility Liners From Acetabular Components: A Technical Tip for a Challenging Surgical Problem.从髋臼组件中取出骨水泥型双动衬垫:解决具有挑战性手术问题的技术提示
Arthroplast Today. 2023 Sep 21;23:101211. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101211. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Implant survival of 662 dual-mobility cups and 727 constrained liners in primary THA: small femoral head size increases the cumulative incidence of revision.
662 枚双动杯和 727 枚限制性衬垫初次全髋关节置换的植入物存活率:小股骨头尺寸增加了翻修的累积发生率。
Acta Orthop. 2021 Dec;92(6):658-664. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1939597. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
4
Global diversity in bearings in primary THA.初次全髋关节置换术中假体的全球多样性。
EFORT Open Rev. 2020 Oct 26;5(10):763-775. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200002. eCollection 2020 Oct.
5
Study protocol: Effectiveness of dual-mobility cups compared with uni-polar cups for preventing dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients - design of a randomized controlled trial nested in the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry.研究方案:双动杯与单极杯在预防老年初次全髋关节置换术后脱位中的有效性比较——一项嵌套在荷兰关节置换登记处的随机对照试验设计。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Oct;91(5):514-519. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1798658. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
6
Comparison of Constrained Acetabular Components and Dual Mobility Cups in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Literature Review.翻修全髋关节置换术中受限髋臼组件与双动杯的比较:文献综述
Hip Pelvis. 2020 Jun;32(2):59-69. doi: 10.5371/hp.2020.32.2.59. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
7
Can Dislocation of a Constrained Liner Be Salvaged With Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA?在翻修全髋关节置换术中,受限衬垫脱位能否通过双动结构挽救?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):305-312. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000026.
8
Risk of revision and dislocation in single, dual mobility and large femoral head total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and network meta-analysis.单动、双动及大股骨头全髋关节置换术的翻修及脱位风险:系统评价与网状Meta分析
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Apr;28(3):445-455. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2073-y. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
9
Total hip arthroplasty instability treatment without dual mobility cups: brief overview and experience of other options.不使用双动髋臼杯的全髋关节置换术不稳定治疗:简要概述及其他选择的经验
Int Orthop. 2017 Mar;41(3):661-668. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3383-0. Epub 2017 Jan 14.