University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville2FAIR Foundation, Palm Desert, California.
Scripps Center for Organ Transplantation, La Jolla, California.
JAMA Surg. 2016 Aug 1;151(8):710-6. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0065.
Patients in the United States waiting for kidney transplantation die in increasing numbers owing to the severe kidney shortage, which might be alleviated by compensating living kidney donors.
To determine the willingness of voting US citizens to become living kidney donors and to ascertain the potential influence of compensation for donation.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A professionally designed quantitative survey was administered by an international polling firm in June 2014. Information was collected on willingness to donate a kidney and the potential influence of compensation ($50 000); survey data included respondent age, income, education level, sex, US region, race/ethnicity, marital status, political affiliation, likelihood to vote, and employment status. The survey was performed via a random-digit dialing process that selected respondents via both landlines and mobile telephones to improve population representation. The survey included 1011 registered US voters likely to vote.
The degree to which the US voting public is willing to donate a kidney and the perceptions of current voters toward paying living kidney donors.
Of the 1011 respondents, 427 were male and 584 were female, with 43% of participants between ages 45 and 64 years. With respondents grouped by willingness to donate, we found that 689 (68%) would donate a kidney to anyone and 235 (23%) only to certain persons; 87 (9%) would not donate. Most (59%) indicated that payment of $50 000 would make them even more likely to donate a kidney, 32% were unmoved by compensation, and 9% were negatively influenced by payment.
Most US voters view living kidney donation positively, and most would be motivated toward donor nephrectomy if offered a payment of $50 000. Because most registered voters favor such payments, and because thousands of lives might be saved should compensation increase the number of transplantable kidneys, laws and regulations prohibiting donor compensation should be modified to allow pilot studies of financial incentives for living kidney donors. Outcomes of such trials could then result in evidence-based policies, which would incorporate fair and just compensation to those persons willing to undergo donor nephrectomy.
由于严重的肾脏短缺,美国的患者等待肾移植的人数不断增加,这可能会通过补偿活体肾脏捐献者来缓解。
确定有投票权的美国公民成为活体肾脏捐献者的意愿,并确定补偿对捐赠的潜在影响。
设计、环境和参与者:一家国际民意调查公司于 2014 年 6 月进行了一项专业设计的定量调查。调查收集了捐赠肾脏的意愿和补偿(50000 美元)的潜在影响的信息;调查数据包括受访者年龄、收入、教育水平、性别、美国地区、种族/族裔、婚姻状况、政治派别、投票意愿和就业状况。该调查通过随机数字拨号过程进行,通过固定电话和移动电话选择受访者,以提高人口代表性。调查包括 1011 名有投票权的美国注册选民。
美国投票公众愿意捐献肾脏的程度,以及当前选民对支付活体肾脏捐献者的看法。
在 1011 名受访者中,427 名是男性,584 名是女性,43%的参与者年龄在 45 岁至 64 岁之间。根据捐赠意愿将受访者分组,我们发现 689 人(68%)愿意将肾脏捐献给任何人,235 人(23%)只愿意捐献给特定的人;87 人(9%)不愿意捐献。大多数人(59%)表示,如果支付 50000 美元,他们会更有可能捐献肾脏,32%的人对补偿无动于衷,9%的人则因支付而受到负面影响。
大多数美国选民对活体肾脏捐献持积极态度,如果支付 50000 美元,大多数人会更倾向于进行供肾切除术。由于大多数登记选民都赞成这种支付方式,而且如果补偿增加可移植肾脏的数量,可能会挽救数千人的生命,因此,应修改禁止捐赠者补偿的法律和法规,允许对活体肾脏捐献者进行经济激励的试点研究。此类试验的结果可以制定基于证据的政策,为愿意接受供肾切除术的人提供公平和公正的补偿。