Dardengo Camila de S, Fernandes Luciana Q P, Capelli Júnior Jonas
Department of Orthodontics, Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Jan-Feb;21(1):54-9. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.1.054-059.oar.
The option of dental extraction for orthodontic purposes has been debated for more than 100 years, including periods when it was widely used in treatment, including the present, during which other methods are used to avoid dental extractions. The objective was to analyze the frequency of tooth extraction treatment performed between 1980 and 2011 at the Orthodontic Clinic of Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ).
The clinical records of 1484 patients undergoing orthodontic treatment were evaluated. The frequency of extractions was evaluated with regard to sex, Angle's classification, the different combinations of extractions and the period when orthodontic treatment began. Chi-square test was used to determine correlations between variables, while the chi-square test for trends was used to assess the frequency of extractions over the years.
There was a reduction of approximately 20% in the frequency of cases treated with tooth extraction over the last 32 years. The most frequently extracted teeth were first premolars. Patients with Class I malocclusion showed fewer extractions, while Class II patients underwent a higher number of extraction treatment. There were no statistically significant differences with regard to sex.
New features introduced into the orthodontic clinic and new esthetic concepts contributed to reducing the number of cases treated with dental extractions. However, dental extractions for orthodontic purposes are still well indicated in certain cases.
出于正畸目的而进行拔牙的选择已经争论了100多年,包括其在治疗中被广泛使用的时期,以及目前使用其他方法来避免拔牙的时期。目的是分析1980年至2011年期间里约热内卢州立大学(UERJ)正畸诊所进行拔牙治疗的频率。
评估了1484例接受正畸治疗患者的临床记录。从性别、安氏分类、不同拔牙组合以及正畸治疗开始的时期等方面评估拔牙频率。采用卡方检验确定变量之间的相关性,同时使用趋势卡方检验评估多年来的拔牙频率。
在过去32年中,拔牙治疗病例的频率下降了约20%。最常拔除的牙齿是第一前磨牙。安氏I类错颌患者的拔牙较少,而安氏II类患者接受拔牙治疗的数量较多。在性别方面没有统计学上的显著差异。
正畸诊所引入的新特征和新的美学观念有助于减少拔牙治疗的病例数量。然而,在某些情况下,出于正畸目的的拔牙仍然是很有必要的。