Proffit W R
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7450.
Angle Orthod. 1994;64(6):407-14. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0407:FROEFA>2.0.CO;2.
In a review of consecutive charts at 5-year intervals from the orthodontic clinic at the University of North Carolina, the number of patients with extraction of all four first premolars increased from 10% in 1953 to 50% in 1963, remained at 35% to 45% until the early 1980s, then declined sharply to the 1950s level by 1993. Extraction for camouflage of Class II malocclusion (maxillary first premolars alone or maxillary first-mandibular second premolars) reached 16% in 1968, then declined, but not as dramatically, and presently is as frequent as the extraction of four first premolars. The rate of extraction of other teeth, done for a variety of individual reasons, has remained almost constant at about 15% for the past 40 years. Thus the total extraction percentage was 30% in 1953, peaked at 76% in 1968, and declined again to 28% in 1993, with almost all the change in the percentage of four first premolar extractions. The increase in first premolar extractions occurred primarily in a search for greater long-term stability; the recent decline seems due to a number of factors. Greater concern about the impact of extraction on facial esthetics, data to suggest that extraction does not guarantee stability, concern about temporomandibular dysfunction, and changes in technique all seem to have played a role. With appropriate orthodontic mechanics, many patients with Class I crowding can be treated satisfactorily with or without premolar extraction.
在对北卡罗来纳大学正畸诊所每隔5年的连续病历进行回顾时发现,拔除全部四颗第一前磨牙的患者数量从1953年的10%增加到1963年的50%,直到20世纪80年代初一直保持在35%至45%,然后到1993年急剧下降至20世纪50年代的水平。用于掩饰II类错(仅拔除上颌第一前磨牙或上颌第一与下颌第二前磨牙)的拔牙比例在1968年达到16%,随后下降,但降幅没有那么大,目前与拔除四颗第一前磨牙的频率相当。因各种个体原因拔除其他牙齿的比例在过去40年里几乎一直稳定在15%左右。因此,1953年的总拔牙比例为30%,1968年达到峰值76%,到1993年又降至28%,几乎所有变化都体现在四颗第一前磨牙拔除比例上。第一前磨牙拔除量的增加主要是为了寻求更大的长期稳定性;近期的下降似乎是多种因素导致的。对面部美观受拔牙影响的关注度提高、有数据表明拔牙并不能保证稳定性、对颞下颌关节功能紊乱的担忧以及技术的变化似乎都起到了作用。通过适当的正畸力学方法,许多I类牙列拥挤患者无论是否拔除前磨牙都能得到满意的治疗效果。