• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小关节射频治疗结果与对比性内侧支阻滞反应之间的相关性是什么?

What is the Correlation Between Facet Joint Radiofrequency Outcome and Response to Comparative Medial Branch Blocks?

作者信息

Holz Sara Christensen, Sehgal Nalini

机构信息

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2016 Mar;19(3):163-72.

PMID:27008290
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Facet joint pain is a common cause of low back pain. There are no physical exam findings that provide a reliable diagnosis. Diagnosis is made by medial branch block injections (MBB). Once the source of pain has been determined, radiofrequency neurotomy (RFN) can be performed. Previous studies have shown that RFN reduces level of pain and improves function. No study has tried to correlate MBB results with outcomes after RFN.

OBJECTIVES

(1) Estimate percentage decrease in pain, decrease in analgesic use, and increase in activity tolerance after facet joint radiofrequency neurotomy (2) Determine correlation between percentage pain relief or duration of pain relief after MBB and RFN outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of patients undergoing RFN, who had = 70% pain relief on 2 sets of MBB with 0.5 - 1 mL of 2% lidocaine (MBB 1) and 0.75% bupivacaine (MBB 2). IRB approval was obtained before data collection began.

SETTING

All patients undergoing RFN between 12/06-1/10 at University Spine and Pain clinics.

METHODS

Subgroup analysis was performed based on response to MBB, a)100% pain relief and <100% pain relief after MBB 1 and 2 and a) those with > 8 hours and = 8 hours pain relief after MBB 1 and 2. Correlational analysis was conducted to determine the correlation between a) percent pain relief after MBB1 and 2 and percent change in pain after RFN and b) duration of pain relief after MBB 1 and 2 and percent change in pain relief after RFN.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Pain intensity, disability index, analgesic use, and patient perception of benefit.

RESULTS

Mean improvement of Disability scores at 3 months was 12.63 (P = 0.001), percent pain relief was 47.68% (P = 0.001). Patients with 100% pain relief after MBB 1 had greater improvement of disability scores (P = 0.008). Those with > 8 hours pain relief after MBB 1 had greater reduction in pain (P = 0.014). Pearson correlation analysis showed no correlation between percent pain relief or duration of pain relief after MBB and percent pain relief after RFN.

LIMITATIONS

This was a small observational study with short-term follow up.

CONCLUSION

Patients had improved disability scores and decreased pain after RFN. No correlation was seen between results on MBB and pain relief after RFN. It is still unclear how many medial branch blocks are needed and the criteria for MBB results before proceeding to RFN.

摘要

背景

小关节疼痛是腰痛的常见原因。没有体格检查结果能够提供可靠的诊断。诊断通过内侧支阻滞注射(MBB)来进行。一旦确定了疼痛来源,就可以进行射频神经切断术(RFN)。既往研究表明,RFN可减轻疼痛程度并改善功能。尚无研究试图将MBB结果与RFN后的疗效相关联。

目的

(1)评估小关节射频神经切断术后疼痛减轻的百分比、镇痛药使用的减少以及活动耐量的增加;(2)确定MBB后疼痛缓解百分比或疼痛缓解持续时间与RFN疗效之间的相关性。

研究设计

对接受RFN的患者进行回顾性研究,这些患者在两组分别注射0.5 - 1 mL 2%利多卡因(MBB 1)和0.75%布比卡因(MBB 2)的MBB中疼痛缓解率≥70%。在开始数据收集前获得了机构审查委员会(IRB)的批准。

地点

大学脊柱与疼痛诊所2006年12月至2010年1月期间所有接受RFN的患者。

方法

根据对MBB的反应进行亚组分析,a)MBB 1和2后100%疼痛缓解和<100%疼痛缓解,以及a)MBB 1和2后疼痛缓解>8小时和≤8小时的患者。进行相关性分析以确定a)MBB 1和2后疼痛缓解百分比与RFN后疼痛变化百分比之间以及b)MBB 1和2后疼痛缓解持续时间与RFN后疼痛缓解变化百分比之间的相关性。

观察指标

疼痛强度、残疾指数、镇痛药使用以及患者对疗效的感知。

结果

3个月时残疾评分的平均改善为12.63(P = 0.001),疼痛缓解百分比为47.68%(P = 0.001)。MBB 1后疼痛完全缓解的患者残疾评分改善更大(P = 0.008)。MBB 1后疼痛缓解>8小时的患者疼痛减轻更明显(P = 0.014)。Pearson相关性分析显示,MBB后疼痛缓解百分比或疼痛缓解持续时间与RFN后疼痛缓解百分比之间无相关性。

局限性

这是一项短期随访的小型观察性研究。

结论

RFN后患者的残疾评分得到改善,疼痛减轻。MBB结果与RFN后疼痛缓解之间未发现相关性。在进行RFN之前,仍不清楚需要多少次内侧支阻滞以及MBB结果的标准。

相似文献

1
What is the Correlation Between Facet Joint Radiofrequency Outcome and Response to Comparative Medial Branch Blocks?小关节射频治疗结果与对比性内侧支阻滞反应之间的相关性是什么?
Pain Physician. 2016 Mar;19(3):163-72.
2
Establishing an optimal "cutoff" threshold for diagnostic lumbar facet blocks: a prospective correlational study.建立诊断性腰椎关节突阻滞的最佳“截断”阈值:一项前瞻性相关性研究。
Clin J Pain. 2013 May;29(5):382-91. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31825f53bf.
3
Correlation of lumbar medial branch neurotomy results with diagnostic medial branch block cutoff values to optimize therapeutic outcome.腰椎内侧支神经切断术结果与诊断性内侧支阻滞截断值的相关性,以优化治疗效果。
Pain Med. 2012 Dec;13(12):1533-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01500.x. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
4
Medial Branch Blocks or Intra-Articular Injections as a Prognostic Tool Before Lumbar Facet Radiofrequency Denervation: A Multicenter, Case-Control Study.腰椎小关节射频去神经术之前,使用内侧支阻滞或关节内注射作为预后工具:一项多中心病例对照研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):376-83. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000229.
5
Comparative outcomes of a 2-year follow-up of cervical medial branch blocks in management of chronic neck pain: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial.比较 2 年随访期内颈椎内侧支阻滞治疗慢性颈痛的疗效:一项随机、双盲对照试验。
Pain Physician. 2010 Sep-Oct;13(5):437-50.
6
Effectiveness of repeated radiofrequency neurotomy for cervical facet joint pain.重复射频神经切断术治疗颈椎小关节疼痛的疗效
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Aug;21(6):406-8. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318158971f.
7
Morphologic changes in the lumbar spine after lumbar medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy: a quantitative radiological study.腰椎内侧支射频神经切断术后腰椎的形态学变化:一项定量放射学研究。
Spine J. 2015 Jun 1;15(6):1415-21. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.096. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
8
Outcomes of Cervical Therapeutic Medial Branch Blocks and Radiofrequency Neurotomy: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Utility are Equivalent.颈椎治疗性内侧支阻滞和射频神经切断术的结果:临床结果和成本效用相当。
Pain Physician. 2022 Jan;25(1):35-47.
9
Lumbar medial branch block progression to radiofrequency neurotomy: A retrospective audit of clinical practice.腰椎内侧支阻滞进展为射频神经切断术:临床实践的回顾性审计
Interv Pain Med. 2022 Jan 6;1(1):100009. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2021.100009. eCollection 2022 Mar.
10
Radiofrequency facet joint neurotomy in treatment of facet syndrome.射频小关节神经切断术治疗小关节综合征
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Oct;23(7):480-5. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181bf1c76.

引用本文的文献

1
7. Cervical facet pain: Degenerative alterations and whiplash-associated disorder.7. 颈椎小关节疼痛:退行性改变与挥鞭样损伤相关疾病。
Pain Pract. 2025 Feb;25(2):e70005. doi: 10.1111/papr.70005.
2
Current trends in the technical performance of lumbar zygapophyseal joint interventions.腰椎关节突关节干预技术操作的当前趋势。
Interv Pain Med. 2022 Dec 14;2(1):100168. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100168. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
A comparison of the effectiveness of cervical medial branch radiofrequency ablation for chronic facet joint syndrome in patients selected by two common medial branch block paradigms.
两种常见内侧支阻滞模式选择的患者中,颈椎内侧支射频消融治疗慢性小关节综合征有效性的比较。
Interv Pain Med. 2022 Apr 8;1(2):100091. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100091. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Radiofrequency Denervation of the Spine and the Sacroiliac Joint: A Systematic Review based on the Grades of Recommendations, Assesment, Development, and Evaluation Approach Resulting in a German National Guideline.脊柱和骶髂关节的射频去神经支配:基于推荐分级、评估、制定与评价方法的系统评价,形成德国国家指南
Global Spine J. 2024 Sep;14(7):2124-2154. doi: 10.1177/21925682241230922. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
5
Radiofrequency Ablation for the Management of Pain of Spinal Origin in Orthopedics.射频消融术在骨科治疗脊柱源性疼痛中的应用
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2023;11(11):666-671. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2023.71327.3333.
6
The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline of Interventional Treatments for Low Back Pain.美国疼痛与神经科学学会(ASPN)关于腰痛介入治疗的循证临床指南。
J Pain Res. 2022 Dec 6;15:3729-3832. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S386879. eCollection 2022.
7
Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group.多学科国际工作组关于颈椎(小关节)关节疼痛干预措施的共识实践指南。
Pain Med. 2021 Nov 26;22(11):2443-2524. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab281.
8
Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group.多学科国际工作组关于颈椎(关节突)关节疼痛干预措施的共识实践指南。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Jan;47(1):3-59. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-103031. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
9
Sensory Stimulation Threshold: A Viable Tool to Improve the Outcome of Lumbar Facet Radiofrequency Denervation?感觉刺激阈值:一种改善腰椎小关节射频去神经术效果的可行工具?
J Pain Res. 2021 Jul 13;14:2113-2119. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S319622. eCollection 2021.
10
Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for lumbar facet joint pain from a multispecialty, international working group.多学科、国际化工作组关于腰椎小关节疼痛干预措施的共识实践指南。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Jun;45(6):424-467. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101243. Epub 2020 Apr 3.