Zhang Xui-Si, Huang Jing, Zhan Cong-Qing, Chen Jing, Li Tao, Kaye Alan D, Wu Sheng-Xi, Xiao Lan
1Department of Histology and Embryology, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Neurobiology, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China; Department of Neurobiology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, PR China.
Department of Neurobiology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, PR China.
Pain Physician. 2016 Mar;19(3):189-96.
Many pain states are linked to central nervous system (CNS) diseases involving the dysfunction of dendritic arborization, making restoration a promising therapeutic strategy. Transfection of primary cortex neurons offers the possibility to study mechanisms which are important for the restoration of proper arborization. Its progress is, however, limited at present due to the lack of suitable gene transfer techniques.
To obtain better insight into the transfection potential of currently used techniques, 2 non-viral transfection methods, lipofection and gene electrotransfer (GET), were compared.
This is a comparison study performed on cultured cells.
The transfection efficiency and neuronal viability, as well as the neuronal dendritic arborization after lipofection or GET, were compared. Primary cultured cortex neurons were transfected with the pEGFP-N1 plasmid, either using Lipofectamine 2000 (2, 3, or 4µL) or with electroporation, with our previously optimized protocol (200V/25 ms).
Transfection efficiency and cell viability were inversely proportional for lipofection. The appropriate ratio of Lipofectamine and plasmid DNA provides optimal conditions for lipofection. Although GET offered higher transfection efficiency, it could not induce complex dendritic arborization, which made it unsuitable for in vitro gene transfer into cortex neurons.
Limitations include species variability and translational applicability for CNS diseases and pain states related to potential toxicity.
Based on these findings, lipofection might be advantageous for in vitro application to primary cultured cortex neurons. Pain states, stress mediated pathogenesis, and certain CNS diseases might potentially utilize this important technique in the future as a therapeutic modality.
许多疼痛状态与涉及树突分支功能障碍的中枢神经系统(CNS)疾病相关,这使得恢复成为一种有前景的治疗策略。原代皮质神经元的转染为研究对恢复正常树突分支很重要的机制提供了可能性。然而,由于缺乏合适的基因转移技术,目前其进展有限。
为了更好地了解当前使用技术的转染潜力,比较了两种非病毒转染方法,即脂质体转染和基因电穿孔转染(GET)。
这是一项在培养细胞上进行的比较研究。
比较了脂质体转染或GET后的转染效率、神经元活力以及神经元树突分支情况。使用Lipofectamine 2000(2、3或4μL)或采用我们先前优化的方案(200V/25ms)进行电穿孔,用pEGFP-N1质粒转染原代培养的皮质神经元。
脂质体转染的转染效率和细胞活力成反比。脂质体与质粒DNA的合适比例为脂质体转染提供了最佳条件。尽管GET提供了更高的转染效率,但它不能诱导复杂的树突分支,这使得它不适用于体外将基因转入皮质神经元。
局限性包括物种变异性以及与潜在毒性相关的对中枢神经系统疾病和疼痛状态的转化适用性。
基于这些发现,脂质体转染可能有利于体外应用于原代培养的皮质神经元。疼痛状态、应激介导的发病机制以及某些中枢神经系统疾病未来可能会潜在地利用这一重要技术作为一种治疗方式。