Smid Bouwien E, Ferraz Maria J, Verhoek Marri, Mirzaian Mina, Wisse Patrick, Overkleeft Herman S, Hollak Carla E, Aerts Johannes M
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Biochemistry, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 Mar 24;11:28. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0413-3.
We retrospectively compared biochemical responses in type 1 Gaucher disease patients to treatment with glycosphingolipid synthesis inhibitors miglustat and eliglustat and ERT.
Seventeen GD1 patients were included (n = 6 eliglustat, (two switched from ERT), n = 9 miglustat (seven switchers), n = 4 ERT (median dose 60U/kg/m). Plasma protein markers reflecting disease burden (chitotriosidase, CCL18) and lipids reflecting substrate accumulation (glucosylsphingosine, glucosylceramide) were determined. Also, liver and spleen volumes, hemoglobin, platelets, and fat fraction were measured.
In patients naïve to treatment, chitotriosidase, CCL18 and glucosylsphingosine decreased comparably upon eliglustat and ERT treatment, while the response to miglustat was less. After 2 years, median decrease of chitotriosidase was 89% (range 77-98), 88% (78-92) and 37% (29-46) for eliglustat, ERT and miglustat naïve patients respectively; decrease of CCL18 was 73% (63-78), 54% (43-86), and 10% (3-18); decrease of glucosylsphingosine was 86% (78-93), 78% (65-91), 48% (46-50). Plasma glucosylceramide in eliglustat treated patients (n = 4) reached values below the normal range (n = 20 healthy controls). Biochemical markers decreased or stabilized in switchers from ERT to eliglustat (n = 2), but less in miglustat switchers (n = 7). Clinical parameters responded comparably upon eliglustat and ERT treatment.
Our explorative study provides evidence that biochemical markers respond comparably in patients receiving eliglustat treatment and ERT, while the corresponding response to miglustat treatment is less.
我们回顾性比较了1型戈谢病患者接受糖鞘脂合成抑制剂米格列醇和依利格鲁司他以及酶替代疗法(ERT)治疗后的生化反应。
纳入了17例GD1患者(n = 6例接受依利格鲁司他治疗,其中2例从ERT转换而来;n = 9例接受米格列醇治疗,其中7例为转换者;n = 4例接受ERT治疗,中位剂量为60U/kg/m)。测定了反映疾病负担的血浆蛋白标志物(几丁质酶、CCL18)以及反映底物蓄积的脂质(葡萄糖神经鞘脂、葡萄糖神经酰胺)。此外,还测量了肝脏和脾脏体积、血红蛋白、血小板和脂肪分数。
在初治患者中,依利格鲁司他和ERT治疗后几丁质酶、CCL18和葡萄糖神经鞘脂的下降程度相当,而米格列醇治疗后的反应较小。2年后,初治依利格鲁司他、ERT和米格列醇患者的几丁质酶中位下降率分别为89%(范围77 - 98)、88%(78 - 92)和37%(29 - 46);CCL18的下降率分别为73%(63 - 78)、54%(43 - 86)和10%(3 - 18);葡萄糖神经鞘脂的下降率分别为86%(78 - 93)、78%(65 - 91)和48%(46 - 50)。接受依利格鲁司他治疗的患者(n = 4)血浆葡萄糖神经酰胺水平降至正常范围以下(n = 20名健康对照者)。从ERT转换为依利格鲁司他的患者(n = 2)生化标志物下降或稳定,但从ERT转换为米格列醇的患者(n = 7)下降程度较小。依利格鲁司他和ERT治疗后临床参数反应相当。
我们的探索性研究提供了证据,表明接受依利格鲁司他治疗和ERT治疗的患者生化标志物反应相当,而米格列醇治疗的相应反应较小。