Christiansen Jens Sandahl, Backeljauw Philippe F, Bidlingmaier Martin, Biller Beverly M K, Boguszewski Margaret C S, Casanueva Felipe F, Chanson Philippe, Chatelain Pierre, Choong Catherine S, Clemmons David R, Cohen Laurie E, Cohen Pinchas, Frystyk Jan, Grimberg Adda, Hasegawa Yukihiro, Haymond Morey W, Ho Ken, Hoffman Andrew R, Holly Jeff M P, Horikawa Reiko, Höybye Charlotte, Jorgensen Jens Otto L, Johannsson Gudmundur, Juul Anders, Katznelson Laurence, Kopchick John J, Lee K O, Lee Kuk-Wha, Luo Xiaoping, Melmed Shlomo, Miller Bradley S, Misra Madhusmita, Popovic Vera, Rosenfeld Ron G, Ross Judith, Ross Richard J, Saenger Paul, Strasburger Christian J, Thorner Michael O, Werner Haim, Yuen Kevin
Aarhus University Aarhus, Denmark.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Eur J Endocrinol. 2016 Jun;174(6):C1-8. doi: 10.1530/EJE-16-0111. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
The Growth Hormone (GH) Research Society (GRS) convened a workshop to address important issues regarding trial design, efficacy, and safety of long-acting growth hormone preparations (LAGH).
A closed meeting of 55 international scientists with expertise in GH, including pediatric and adult endocrinologists, basic scientists, regulatory scientists, and participants from the pharmaceutical industry.
Current literature was reviewed for gaps in knowledge. Expert opinion was used to suggest studies required to address potential safety and efficacy issues.
Following plenary presentations summarizing the literature, breakout groups discussed questions framed by the planning committee. Attendees reconvened after each breakout session to share group reports. A writing team compiled the breakout session reports into a draft document that was discussed and revised in an open forum on the concluding day. This was edited further and then circulated to attendees from academic institutions for review after the meeting. Participants from pharmaceutical companies did not participate in the planning, writing, or in the discussions and text revision on the final day of the workshop. Scientists from industry and regulatory agencies reviewed the manuscript to identify any factual errors.
LAGH compounds may represent an advance over daily GH injections because of increased convenience and differing phamacodynamic properties, providing the potential for improved adherence and outcomes. Better methods to assess adherence must be developed and validated. Long-term surveillance registries that include assessment of efficacy, cost-benefit, disease burden, quality of life, and safety are essential for understanding the impact of sustained exposure to LAGH preparations.
生长激素研究学会(GRS)召开了一次研讨会,以探讨长效生长激素制剂(LAGH)在试验设计、疗效和安全性方面的重要问题。
55名国际科学家参加了此次闭门会议,他们在生长激素领域具有专业知识,包括儿科和成人内分泌学家、基础科学家、监管科学家以及制药行业的代表。
对当前文献进行了综述,以找出知识空白。利用专家意见提出解决潜在安全性和疗效问题所需的研究。
在全会报告总结文献之后,分组讨论由计划委员会提出的问题。每次分组讨论会后,与会者重新集合分享小组报告。一个写作团队将分组讨论报告汇编成一份文件草案,在最后一天的公开论坛上进行讨论和修订。进一步编辑后,在会议结束后分发给学术机构的与会者进行审阅。制药公司的参与者未参与研讨会最后一天的计划、写作、讨论和文本修订。来自行业和监管机构的科学家对稿件进行了审阅,以确定是否存在事实错误。
由于便利性提高和药代动力学特性不同,长效生长激素化合物可能比每日注射生长激素有所进步,具有提高依从性和改善治疗效果的潜力。必须开发并验证更好的评估依从性的方法。长期监测登记系统,包括对疗效、成本效益、疾病负担、生活质量和安全性的评估,对于了解持续使用长效生长激素制剂的影响至关重要。