Albers Norbert, Cadarette Sarah, Feakins Ben, Arregui María, Ebohon Stephen, Lai Pamela, Raveendran Subhara, Kjelgaard-Hansen Mads, Andersen Christine, Zhao Carol, Smith Alden, Geffner Mitchell
Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Christliches Kinderhospital, Osnabrueck 49074, Germany.
Cencora, Conshohocken, PA 19428, USA.
J Endocr Soc. 2025 Mar 4;9(5):bvaf040. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvaf040. eCollection 2025 May.
Long-acting growth hormone (LAGH) has the potential to improve adherence and outcomes over daily somatropin in growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Whereas daily somatropin products are molecularly identical, LAGHs are molecularly distinct; additional moieties or mechanisms that prolong LAGH action confer unique pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties that could affect efficacy and safety. Only one LAGH available in the United States and Europe (lonapegsomatropin) delivers unmodified somatropin. With no head-to-head clinical trials of LAGHs available, this systematic literature review and network meta-analysis were conducted to compare the relative efficacy and safety of LAGHs in pediatric GHD. Five trials were eligible for inclusion in a Bayesian network meta-analysis; 3 contributed to the base case network, including 3 LAGHs (lonapegsomatropin, somapacitan, and somatrogon) and daily somatropin. Treatment with lonapegsomatropin was associated with statistically significantly higher annualized height velocity and change from baseline in height SD score (SDS) at week 52 compared to daily somatropin and somapacitan; no other significant differences in these outcomes were found. The change from baseline in average insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) SDS at week 52 was significantly higher for somatrogon vs all comparators and for lonapegsomatropin vs daily somatropin and somapacitan; average IGF-1 SDS was within normal range in all trials. No significant differences were seen in progression in bone age-to-chronological age ratio or serious adverse events (SAEs). Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the base case. In this network meta-analysis, lonapegsomatropin was the only LAGH associated with better growth outcomes. No significant differences were detected regarding SAEs; other safety outcomes could not be analyzed.
长效生长激素(LAGH)相较于每日注射的生长激素,在改善生长激素缺乏症(GHD)患者的依从性和治疗效果方面具有潜力。虽然每日注射的生长激素产品在分子结构上相同,但LAGH在分子结构上有所不同;延长LAGH作用的附加部分或机制赋予了其独特的药效学/药代动力学特性,这可能会影响疗效和安全性。在美国和欧洲可用的LAGH中,只有一种(lonapegsomatropin)提供未修饰的生长激素。由于缺乏LAGH的头对头临床试验,因此进行了这项系统的文献综述和网络荟萃分析,以比较LAGH在儿童GHD中的相对疗效和安全性。五项试验符合纳入贝叶斯网络荟萃分析的条件;三项试验构成了基础病例网络,包括三种LAGH(lonapegsomatropin、somapacitan和somatrogon)以及每日注射的生长激素。与每日注射的生长激素和somapacitan相比,lonapegsomatropin治疗在第52周时年化身高增长速度和身高标准差评分(SDS)较基线的变化在统计学上显著更高;在这些结果中未发现其他显著差异。与所有对照相比,somatrogon在第52周时平均胰岛素样生长因子-1(IGF-1)SDS较基线的变化显著更高,lonapegsomatropin与每日注射的生长激素和somapacitan相比也是如此;所有试验中平均IGF-1 SDS均在正常范围内。在骨龄与实际年龄比值进展或严重不良事件(SAE)方面未观察到显著差异。敏感性分析与基础病例一致。在这项网络荟萃分析中,lonapegsomatropin是唯一一种与更好生长结果相关的LAGH。在SAE方面未检测到显著差异;其他安全结果无法进行分析。