Palomo Concepción, Mas Vicente, Thom Michelle, Vázquez Mónica, Cano Olga, Terrón María C, Luque Daniel, Taylor Geraldine, Melero José A
Unidad de Biología Viral, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, and CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
The Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey, United Kingdom.
J Virol. 2016 May 12;90(11):5485-5498. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00338-16. Print 2016 Jun 1.
Human respiratory syncytial virus (hRSV) vaccine development has received new impetus from structure-based studies of its main protective antigen, the fusion (F) glycoprotein. Three soluble forms of F have been described: monomeric, trimeric prefusion, and trimeric postfusion. Most human neutralizing antibodies recognize epitopes found exclusively in prefusion F. Although prefusion F induces higher levels of neutralizing antibodies than does postfusion F, postfusion F can also induce protection against virus challenge in animals. However, the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of the three forms of F have not hitherto been directly compared. Hence, BALB/c mice were immunized with a single dose of the three proteins adjuvanted with CpG and challenged 4 weeks later with virus. Serum antibodies, lung virus titers, weight loss, and pulmonary pathology were evaluated after challenge. Whereas small amounts of postfusion F were sufficient to protect mice, larger amounts of monomeric and prefusion F proteins were required for protection. However, postfusion and monomeric F proteins were associated with more pathology after challenge than was prefusion F. Antibodies induced by all doses of prefusion F, in contrast to other F protein forms, reacted predominantly with the prefusion F conformation. At high doses, prefusion F also induced the highest titers of neutralizing antibodies, and all mice were protected, yet at low doses of the immunogen, these antibodies neutralized virus poorly, and mice were not protected. These findings should be considered when developing new hRSV vaccine candidates.
Protection against hRSV infection is afforded mainly by neutralizing antibodies, which recognize mostly epitopes found exclusively in the viral fusion (F) glycoprotein trimer, folded in its prefusion conformation, i.e., before activation for membrane fusion. Although prefusion F is able to induce high levels of neutralizing antibodies, highly stable postfusion F (found after membrane fusion) is also able to induce neutralizing antibodies and protect against infection. In addition, a monomeric form of hRSV F that shares epitopes with prefusion F was recently reported. Since each of the indicated forms of hRSV F may have advantages and disadvantages for the development of safe and efficacious subunit vaccines, a direct comparison of the immunogenic properties and protective efficacies of the different forms of hRSV F was made in a mouse model. The results obtained show important differences between the noted immunogens that should be borne in mind when considering the development of hRSV vaccines.
人类呼吸道合胞病毒(hRSV)疫苗的研发因对其主要保护性抗原融合(F)糖蛋白的基于结构的研究而获得了新的动力。已描述了F的三种可溶性形式:单体、三聚体前体融合和三聚体后体融合。大多数人类中和抗体识别仅存在于前体融合F中的表位。尽管前体融合F比后体融合F诱导更高水平的中和抗体,但后体融合F也能在动物中诱导针对病毒攻击的保护作用。然而,三种形式的F的免疫原性和保护效力迄今尚未直接比较。因此,用单剂量的三种与CpG佐剂化的蛋白质免疫BALB/c小鼠,并在4周后用病毒攻击。攻击后评估血清抗体、肺病毒滴度、体重减轻和肺部病理学。虽然少量的后体融合F足以保护小鼠,但需要大量的单体和前体融合F蛋白才能起到保护作用。然而,与前体融合F相比,后体融合和单体F蛋白在攻击后与更多的病理学相关。与其他F蛋白形式相比,所有剂量的前体融合F诱导的抗体主要与前体融合F构象反应。在高剂量时,前体融合F也诱导最高滴度的中和抗体,并且所有小鼠都受到保护,但在低剂量的免疫原时,这些抗体对病毒的中和作用很差,小鼠未受到保护。在开发新的hRSV候选疫苗时应考虑这些发现。
对hRSV感染的保护主要由中和抗体提供,这些抗体大多识别仅存在于病毒融合(F)糖蛋白三聚体中的表位,该三聚体以其前体融合构象折叠,即在激活膜融合之前。尽管前体融合F能够诱导高水平的中和抗体,但高度稳定的后体融合F(在膜融合后发现)也能够诱导中和抗体并预防感染。此外,最近报道了一种与前体融合F共享表位的hRSV F单体形式。由于hRSV F的每种所示形式在开发安全有效的亚单位疫苗方面可能都有优缺点,因此在小鼠模型中对不同形式的hRSV F的免疫原性特性和保护效力进行了直接比较。获得的结果显示了这些免疫原之间的重要差异,在考虑开发hRSV疫苗时应牢记这些差异。