Suppr超能文献

儿童枕颞叶腹侧皮质中汉字与英文单词的加工:书写不变性的功能磁共振成像证据

Chinese Character and English Word processing in children's ventral occipitotemporal cortex: fMRI evidence for script invariance.

作者信息

Krafnick Anthony J, Tan Li-Hai, Flowers D Lynn, Luetje Megan M, Napoliello Eileen M, Siok Wai-Ting, Perfetti Charles, Eden Guinevere F

机构信息

Center for the Study of Learning, Georgetown University Medical Center, 4000 Reservoir Road, Building D Suite 150, Washington, DC 20057, USA.

State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Room 409, The Hong Kong Jockey Club Building for Interdisciplinary Research, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2016 Jun;133:302-312. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.021. Epub 2016 Mar 21.

Abstract

Learning to read is thought to involve the recruitment of left hemisphere ventral occipitotemporal cortex (OTC) by a process of "neuronal recycling", whereby object processing mechanisms are co-opted for reading. Under the same theoretical framework, it has been proposed that the visual word form area (VWFA) within OTC processes orthographic stimuli independent of culture and writing systems, suggesting that it is universally involved in written language. However, this "script invariance" has yet to be demonstrated in monolingual readers of two different writing systems studied under the same experimental conditions. Here, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we examined activity in response to English Words and Chinese Characters in 1st graders in the United States and China, respectively. We examined each group separately and found the readers of English as well as the readers of Chinese to activate the left ventral OTC for their respective native writing systems (using both a whole-brain and a bilateral OTC-restricted analysis). Critically, a conjunction analysis of the two groups revealed significant overlap between them for native writing system processing, located in the VWFA and therefore supporting the hypothesis of script invariance. In the second part of the study, we further examined the left OTC region responsive to each group's native writing system and found that it responded equally to Object stimuli (line drawings) in the Chinese-reading children. In English-reading children, the OTC responded much more to Objects than to English Words. Together, these results support the script invariant role of the VWFA and also support the idea that the areas recruited for character or word processing are rooted in object processing mechanisms of the left OTC.

摘要

学习阅读被认为涉及通过“神经元再利用”过程来募集左半球腹侧枕颞叶皮质(OTC),即在此过程中,物体处理机制被用于阅读。在相同的理论框架下,有人提出OTC内的视觉词形区(VWFA)处理正字法刺激时不受文化和书写系统的影响,这表明它普遍参与书面语言处理。然而,在相同实验条件下对两种不同书写系统的单语读者进行研究时,这种“文字不变性”尚未得到证实。在此,我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)分别检测了美国和中国一年级学生对英语单词和汉字的反应活动。我们分别对每组进行检测,发现英语读者和汉语读者在处理各自母语书写系统时均激活了左腹侧OTC(使用全脑分析和双侧OTC受限分析)。关键的是,对两组的联合分析显示,在VWFA中,他们在处理母语书写系统时存在显著重叠,因此支持了文字不变性的假设。在研究的第二部分,我们进一步检测了对每组母语书写系统有反应的左OTC区域,发现中国儿童阅读组中该区域对物体刺激(线条图)的反应相同。在英语阅读儿童中,OTC对物体的反应比对英语单词的反应要强烈得多。总之,这些结果支持了VWFA的文字不变性功能,也支持了用于处理字符或单词的区域根植于左OTC的物体处理机制这一观点。

相似文献

8
Cerebral mechanisms for different second language writing systems.不同第二语言书写系统的大脑机制。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Sep;51(11):2261-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Abnormal visual motion processing is not a cause of dyslexia.异常的视觉运动处理不是阅读障碍的原因。
Neuron. 2013 Jul 10;79(1):180-90. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jun 6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验