Suppr超能文献

通过吸烟评估人类对尼古丁的辨别能力。

Assessing Discrimination of Nicotine in Humans Via Cigarette Smoking.

作者信息

Perkins Kenneth A, Kunkle Nicole, Michael Valerie C, Karelitz Joshua L, Donny Eric C

机构信息

Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA;

Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Sep;18(9):1830-6. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw082. Epub 2016 Mar 24.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Nicotine's interoceptive stimulus effects likely help explain smoking's reinforcing efficacy, but human studies have been limited by difficulties controlling dosing via tobacco inhalation. Our objective was to describe a procedure to study nicotine discrimination via smoking.

METHODS

Dependent smokers abstinent overnight (>12 hours) were first "trained" to discriminate between two cigarettes differing in nicotine content, based on four puffs of exposure, and then tested on whether they successfully acquired that discrimination. After piloting with Quest brand commercial cigarettes, 29 subjects engaged in the main study with cigarettes available through NIDA (Spectrum; 16mg vs. 0.4mg nicotine content). Discrimination training first involved two trials, one with each cigarette, prior to six testing trials. Due to results with the first 20 subjects, the remaining nine received two training trials with each cigarette (four total). Subjective perceptions were also assessed during each testing trial, and puff choice between the two cigarettes available concurrently was assessed after testing, on the last two trials.

RESULTS

All five pilot subjects successfully discriminated Quest 1 versus Quest 3 (defined by at least five out of six trials correct, ie, >80%). Yet, only 10 of 20 subjects (50%) were able to discriminate the two Spectrum cigarettes based on two training trials. After changing to four training trials, eight of nine subjects were able to discriminate (89%). Subjective perceptions and puff choice differed between cigarettes more in those able versus unable to discriminate them.

CONCLUSIONS

With sufficient training exposures, smokers can discriminate nicotine between cigarettes differing in nicotine contents.

IMPLICATIONS

The interoceptive stimulus effects of nicotine are critical to understanding reinforcement from cigarette smoking behavior. Because of the very recent availability of Spectrum research cigarettes from NIDA, with specific known amounts of nicotine content, the study of nicotine discrimination in humans via cigarette smoking may now be feasible. Our results demonstrate that, with sufficient training, smokers can behaviorally discriminate nicotine from four puffs' exposure between cigarettes differing in nicotine contents. Future research should evaluate human discrimination of nicotine from greater amounts of cigarette smoke exposure, as well as in response to other procedural variations.

摘要

引言

尼古丁的内感受性刺激效应可能有助于解释吸烟的强化效力,但人体研究一直受到通过烟草吸入控制剂量困难的限制。我们的目标是描述一种通过吸烟来研究尼古丁辨别能力的方法。

方法

过夜戒烟(超过12小时)的依赖吸烟者首先基于四次抽吸暴露,接受“训练”以辨别两种尼古丁含量不同的香烟,然后测试他们是否成功获得了这种辨别能力。在用探索者(Quest)品牌商业香烟进行预试验后,29名受试者参与了主要研究,使用的香烟由美国国立药物滥用研究所(NIDA)提供(光谱(Spectrum)牌;尼古丁含量分别为16毫克和0.4毫克)。辨别训练首先包括两次试验,每种香烟各进行一次,然后是六次测试试验。由于前20名受试者的试验结果,其余9名受试者每种香烟接受了两次训练试验(共四次)。在每次测试试验期间还评估了主观感受,并且在测试后的最后两次试验中评估了同时提供的两种香烟之间的抽吸选择。

结果

所有5名预试验受试者都成功辨别了探索者1号与探索者3号香烟(定义为六次试验中至少五次正确,即>80%)。然而,20名受试者中只有10名(50%)能够基于两次训练试验辨别两种光谱牌香烟。在改为四次训练试验后,9名受试者中有8名能够辨别(89%)。能够辨别和不能辨别香烟的受试者之间,香烟的主观感受和抽吸选择差异更大。

结论

经过足够的训练暴露后,吸烟者能够辨别尼古丁含量不同的香烟中的尼古丁。

启示

尼古丁的内感受性刺激效应对于理解吸烟行为的强化作用至关重要。由于美国国立药物滥用研究所最近才提供了光谱研究香烟,其尼古丁含量已知且具体,通过吸烟对人类尼古丁辨别能力的研究现在可能可行。我们的结果表明,经过足够的训练,吸烟者能够从四次抽吸暴露中行为性地辨别尼古丁含量不同的香烟中的尼古丁。未来的研究应该评估人类对更多香烟烟雾暴露中尼古丁的辨别能力,以及对其他程序变化的反应。

相似文献

1
Assessing Discrimination of Nicotine in Humans Via Cigarette Smoking.通过吸烟评估人类对尼古丁的辨别能力。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Sep;18(9):1830-6. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw082. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
2
Threshold dose for discrimination of nicotine via cigarette smoking.通过吸烟辨别尼古丁的阈剂量。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Jun;233(12):2309-17. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4281-2. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
6
Differences in acute reinforcement across reduced nicotine content cigarettes.不同低尼古丁含量香烟的急性强化作用差异。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Jun;237(6):1885-1891. doi: 10.1007/s00213-020-05509-9. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
7
Reinforcing effects of nicotine and non-nicotine components of cigarette smoke.香烟烟雾中尼古丁和非尼古丁成分的强化作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010 May;210(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-1810-2. Epub 2010 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

4
Exploring the interoceptive stimulus effects of nicotine and varenicline.探讨尼古丁和伐尼克兰的内感受性刺激效应。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2019 Jun;181:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
8
Threshold dose for discrimination of nicotine via cigarette smoking.通过吸烟辨别尼古丁的阈剂量。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Jun;233(12):2309-17. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4281-2. Epub 2016 Apr 2.

本文引用的文献

2
Nicotine reinforcement in never-smokers.从未吸烟者的尼古丁强化作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015 Dec;232(23):4243-52. doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-4053-4. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
4
The effect of menthol on cigarette smoking behaviors, biomarkers and subjective responses.薄荷醇对吸烟行为、生物标志物和主观反应的影响。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013 Mar;22(3):382-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-1097. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
5
Dose-response effects of spectrum research cigarettes.光谱研究香烟的剂量反应效应。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Jun;15(6):1113-21. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts247. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
6
Nicotine reduction: strategic research plan.尼古丁减量:战略研究计划。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Jun;15(6):1003-13. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts214. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
9
Role of cigarette sensory cues in modifying puffing topography.香烟感觉线索在改变吸烟地形学中的作用。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Jul 1;124(1-2):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.01.012. Epub 2012 Feb 25.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验