• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结构磁共振图像的强度不均匀性校正:一种基于数据驱动的方法来定义输入算法参数。

Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction of Structural MR Images: A Data-Driven Approach to Define Input Algorithm Parameters.

作者信息

Ganzetti Marco, Wenderoth Nicole, Mantini Dante

机构信息

Neural Control of Movement Laboratory, ETH ZurichZurich, Switzerland; Department of Experimental Psychology, University of OxfordOxford, UK.

Neural Control of Movement Laboratory, ETH Zurich Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Neuroinform. 2016 Mar 15;10:10. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2016.00010. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fninf.2016.00010
PMID:27014050
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4791378/
Abstract

Intensity non-uniformity (INU) in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a major issue when conducting analyses of brain structural properties. An inaccurate INU correction may result in qualitative and quantitative misinterpretations. Several INU correction methods exist, whose performance largely depend on the specific parameter settings that need to be chosen by the user. Here we addressed the question of how to select the best input parameters for a specific INU correction algorithm. Our investigation was based on the INU correction algorithm implemented in SPM, but this can be in principle extended to any other algorithm requiring the selection of input parameters. We conducted a comprehensive comparison of indirect metrics for the assessment of INU correction performance, namely the coefficient of variation of white matter (CVWM), the coefficient of variation of gray matter (CVGM), and the coefficient of joint variation between white matter and gray matter (CJV). Using simulated MR data, we observed the CJV to be more accurate than CVWM and CVGM, provided that the noise level in the INU-corrected image was controlled by means of spatial smoothing. Based on the CJV, we developed a data-driven approach for selecting INU correction parameters, which could effectively work on actual MR images. To this end, we implemented an enhanced procedure for the definition of white and gray matter masks, based on which the CJV was calculated. Our approach was validated using actual T1-weighted images collected with 1.5 T, 3 T, and 7 T MR scanners. We found that our procedure can reliably assist the selection of valid INU correction algorithm parameters, thereby contributing to an enhanced inhomogeneity correction in MR images.

摘要

在进行脑结构特性分析时,磁共振(MR)成像中的强度不均匀性(INU)是一个主要问题。不准确的INU校正可能导致定性和定量的错误解读。存在几种INU校正方法,其性能在很大程度上取决于用户需要选择的特定参数设置。在这里,我们解决了如何为特定的INU校正算法选择最佳输入参数的问题。我们的研究基于SPM中实现的INU校正算法,但原则上这可以扩展到任何其他需要选择输入参数的算法。我们对评估INU校正性能的间接指标进行了全面比较,即白质变异系数(CVWM)、灰质变异系数(CVGM)以及白质和灰质之间的联合变异系数(CJV)。使用模拟MR数据,我们观察到,如果通过空间平滑控制INU校正图像中的噪声水平,CJV比CVWM和CVGM更准确。基于CJV,我们开发了一种数据驱动的方法来选择INU校正参数,该方法可以有效地应用于实际MR图像。为此,我们实施了一种增强的程序来定义白质和灰质掩码,并在此基础上计算CJV。我们的方法使用1.5T、3T和7T MR扫描仪采集的实际T1加权图像进行了验证。我们发现我们的程序可以可靠地辅助选择有效的INU校正算法参数,从而有助于增强MR图像中的不均匀性校正。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24ad/4791378/fd878c977ce1/fninf-10-00010-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24ad/4791378/24893d3b94ed/fninf-10-00010-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24ad/4791378/d062c3d9452b/fninf-10-00010-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24ad/4791378/6782335a2ff1/fninf-10-00010-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24ad/4791378/cd137b1a96a1/fninf-10-00010-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24ad/4791378/968c2c1045d9/fninf-10-00010-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24ad/4791378/71f56eeb5437/fninf-10-00010-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24ad/4791378/2f3b1c5905fa/fninf-10-00010-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24ad/4791378/be52c1db45ae/fninf-10-00010-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24ad/4791378/fd878c977ce1/fninf-10-00010-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24ad/4791378/24893d3b94ed/fninf-10-00010-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24ad/4791378/d062c3d9452b/fninf-10-00010-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24ad/4791378/6782335a2ff1/fninf-10-00010-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24ad/4791378/cd137b1a96a1/fninf-10-00010-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24ad/4791378/968c2c1045d9/fninf-10-00010-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24ad/4791378/71f56eeb5437/fninf-10-00010-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24ad/4791378/2f3b1c5905fa/fninf-10-00010-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24ad/4791378/be52c1db45ae/fninf-10-00010-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24ad/4791378/fd878c977ce1/fninf-10-00010-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction of Structural MR Images: A Data-Driven Approach to Define Input Algorithm Parameters.结构磁共振图像的强度不均匀性校正:一种基于数据驱动的方法来定义输入算法参数。
Front Neuroinform. 2016 Mar 15;10:10. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2016.00010. eCollection 2016.
2
Quantitative Evaluation of Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction Methods for Structural MR Brain Images.用于脑部结构磁共振图像的强度不均匀性校正方法的定量评估
Neuroinformatics. 2016 Jan;14(1):5-21. doi: 10.1007/s12021-015-9277-2.
3
Intensity non-uniformity correction in MR imaging using residual cycle generative adversarial network.基于残差循环生成对抗网络的磁共振成像强度不均匀性校正。
Phys Med Biol. 2020 Nov 27;65(21):215025. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/abb31f.
4
Post-acquisition correction of MR inhomogeneities.磁共振不均匀性的采集后校正
Magn Reson Med. 1996 Aug;36(2):275-86. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910360215.
5
Method for bias field correction of brain T1-weighted magnetic resonance images minimizing segmentation error.一种使脑T1加权磁共振图像分割误差最小化的偏置场校正方法。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2004 Jun;22(2):133-44. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20013.
6
Spatial Fuzzy C Means and Expectation Maximization Algorithms with Bias Correction for Segmentation of MR Brain Images.用于磁共振脑图像分割的带偏差校正的空间模糊C均值和期望最大化算法
J Med Syst. 2017 Jan;41(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s10916-016-0662-7. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
7
Robust generative asymmetric GMM for brain MR image segmentation.用于脑部磁共振图像分割的稳健生成式非对称高斯混合模型
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2017 Nov;151:123-138. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.08.017. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
8
Efficient inhomogeneity compensation using fuzzy c-means clustering models.利用模糊 C 均值聚类模型进行高效的非均匀性补偿。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2012 Oct;108(1):80-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
9
Evaluation of performance metrics for bias field correction in MR brain images.磁共振脑图像中偏置场校正性能指标的评估。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Jun;29(6):1271-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21768.
10
Intensity inhomogeneity correction of multispectral MR images.多光谱磁共振图像的强度不均匀性校正
Neuroimage. 2006 Aug 1;32(1):54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.020. Epub 2006 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Automated quality control of T1-weighted brain MRI scans for clinical research datasets: methods comparison and design of a quality prediction classifier.用于临床研究数据集的T1加权脑磁共振成像扫描的自动质量控制:方法比较与质量预测分类器设计
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 May 28;3. doi: 10.1162/IMAG.a.4. eCollection 2025.
2
Superpixel-ComBat modeling: A joint approach for harmonization and characterization of inter-scanner variability in T1-weighted images.超像素ComBat建模:一种用于协调和表征T1加权图像中扫描仪间变异性的联合方法。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Oct 3;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00306. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Quantitative Evaluation of Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction Methods for Structural MR Brain Images.用于脑部结构磁共振图像的强度不均匀性校正方法的定量评估
Neuroinformatics. 2016 Jan;14(1):5-21. doi: 10.1007/s12021-015-9277-2.
2
Intensity inhomogeneity correction for magnetic resonance imaging of human brain at 7T.7T 人脑磁共振成像的强度不均匀性校正。
Med Phys. 2014 Feb;41(2):022302. doi: 10.1118/1.4860954.
3
Patients with disease of brain, cerebral vasculature, and spine.患有脑部、脑血管和脊柱疾病的患者。
Emo-FilM: A multimodal dataset for affective neuroscience using naturalistic stimuli.
Emo-FilM:一个使用自然主义刺激的情感神经科学多模态数据集。
Sci Data. 2025 Apr 23;12(1):684. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-04803-5.
4
China's social fake news database release with brain structural, functional, and behavioural measures.中国发布具有脑结构、功能和行为测量数据的社会假新闻数据库。
Sci Data. 2025 Mar 31;12(1):538. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-04901-4.
5
Longitudinal neuroanatomical increases from early to one-year postpartum.从产后早期到产后一年的纵向神经解剖学变化。
Brain Struct Funct. 2024 Dec;229(9):2479-2492. doi: 10.1007/s00429-024-02852-x. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
6
Deep learning for efficient reconstruction of highly accelerated 3D FLAIR MRI in neurological deficits.深度学习用于高效重建神经功能缺损中高度加速的三维液体衰减反转恢复磁共振成像
MAGMA. 2025 Feb;38(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s10334-024-01200-8. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
7
A three-step, "brute-force" approach toward optimized affine spatial normalization.一种用于优化仿射空间归一化的三步“强力”方法。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2024 Jul 8;18:1367148. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2024.1367148. eCollection 2024.
8
Longitudinal Neuroanatomical Increases from Early to One-Year Postpartum.从产后早期到产后一年的纵向神经解剖学变化
Res Sq. 2024 Jun 3:rs.3.rs-4432804. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4432804/v1.
9
Cortical grey matter volume differences in children with developmental coordination disorder compared to typically developing children.与发育正常的儿童相比,发育性协调障碍儿童的皮质灰质体积差异。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 May 17;18:1276057. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1276057. eCollection 2024.
10
Simulating rigid head motion artifacts on brain magnitude MRI data-Outcome on image quality and segmentation of the cerebral cortex.模拟大脑幅度 MRI 数据中的刚性头部运动伪影-对大脑皮层图像质量和分割的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0301132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301132. eCollection 2024.
Med Clin North Am. 2013 Nov;97(6):993-1013. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
4
Neuroimaging of structural pathology and connectomics in traumatic brain injury: Toward personalized outcome prediction.创伤性脑损伤的结构病理学和连接组学神经影像学:迈向个体化预后预测。
Neuroimage Clin. 2012 Aug 24;1(1):1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2012.08.002. eCollection 2012.
5
7 Tesla MR imaging: opportunities and challenges.7特斯拉磁共振成像:机遇与挑战。
Rofo. 2014 Feb;186(2):121-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1350406. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
6
Neuroradiological evaluation of demyelinating disease.脱髓鞘疾病的神经影像学评估。
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2013 Jul;6(4):249-68. doi: 10.1177/1756285613478870.
7
7-T MR--from research to clinical applications?7-T MRI:从研究到临床应用?
NMR Biomed. 2012 May;25(5):695-716. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1794. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
8
Mapping the structural brain changes in Alzheimer's disease: the independent contribution of two imaging modalities.阿尔茨海默病结构脑变化的映射:两种成像方式的独立贡献。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;26 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):263-74. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-0040.
9
Multi-parametric neuroimaging reproducibility: a 3-T resource study.多参数神经影像学可重复性:3-T 资源研究。
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 14;54(4):2854-66. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.047. Epub 2010 Nov 20.
10
Unified segmentation based correction of R1 brain maps for RF transmit field inhomogeneities (UNICORT).基于统一分割的 R1 脑图谱校正射频发射场不均匀性(UNICORT)。
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2116-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.023. Epub 2010 Oct 18.