Suppr超能文献

“莫私有化巨人的肩膀”:重新思考植物育种中的专利。

'Do Not Privatize the Giant's Shoulders': Rethinking Patents in Plant Breeding.

机构信息

Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.

出版信息

Trends Biotechnol. 2016 Aug;34(8):609-617. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Mar 23.

Abstract

Intellectual property rights (IPRs) have increasing impacts on plant breeding. Not only varieties but also germplasm and technologies are protected. Intellectual property has also affected corporate concentration in the seed supply chain. While not very controversial in the USA, it is increasingly controversial in Europe after rulings on plant patents concerning nontransgenic crops in 2015. Both political and industry voices call for new interpretations or legislations. Industry initiatives have opened facilitated patent access systems designated 'free access, but not access for free'. Although praiseworthy, they are voluntary and so far limited to vegetable crops. This Opinion article suggests a mandatory system of declaring IPR use linked to variety registration. This compulsory licensing system with 'toll roads, not road blocks', is likely to reward IPRs without delaying breeding progress.

摘要

知识产权(IPR)对植物育种的影响越来越大。不仅品种,而且种质资源和技术都受到保护。知识产权还影响了种子供应链中的企业集中。在美国,这并不是一个非常有争议的问题,但在 2015 年有关非转基因作物的植物专利裁决后,在欧洲越来越有争议。政治和行业的声音都呼吁进行新的解释或立法。行业倡议已经开放了便利的专利获取系统,指定为“免费获取,但不是免费获取”。虽然值得称赞,但它们是自愿的,迄今为止仅限于蔬菜作物。本文认为,有必要建立一种强制性的知识产权使用声明制度,与品种登记挂钩。这种强制性许可制度是“收费公路,而不是路障”,可能会在不延误育种进展的情况下奖励知识产权。

相似文献

1
'Do Not Privatize the Giant's Shoulders': Rethinking Patents in Plant Breeding.
Trends Biotechnol. 2016 Aug;34(8):609-617. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
2
[Placing on the market, breeders rights and growing genetically modified (GM) varieties].
J Soc Biol. 2009;203(4):333-6. doi: 10.1051/jbio/2009038. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
3
The Open Source Seed Licence: A novel approach to safeguarding access to plant germplasm.
PLoS Biol. 2018 Oct 23;16(10):e3000023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000023. eCollection 2018 Oct.
4
Intellectual property protection for plant innovation: unresolved issues after J.E.M. v. Pioneer.
Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Nov;20(11):1161-4. doi: 10.1038/nbt1102-1161.
5
An intellectual property sharing initiative in agricultural biotechnology: development of broadly accessible technologies for plant transformation.
Plant Biotechnol J. 2012 Jun;10(5):501-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00674.x. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
6
Transgenic crops, biotechnology and ownership rights: what scientists need to know.
Plant J. 2002 Aug;31(4):407-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01367.x.
7
EPO neem patent revocation revives biopiracy debate.
Nat Biotechnol. 2005 May;23(5):511-2. doi: 10.1038/nbt0505-511.
8
Intellectual property protection for plant-related inventions in Europe.
Nat Rev Genet. 2003 Oct;4(10):834-8. doi: 10.1038/nrg1184.
9
Intellectual property rights. Public sector collaboration for agricultural IP management.
Science. 2003 Jul 11;301(5630):174-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1085553.
10
The public-private structure of intellectual property ownership in agricultural biotechnology.
Nat Biotechnol. 2003 Sep;21(9):989-95. doi: 10.1038/nbt0903-989.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验