• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An investigation of general predictors for cognitive-behavioural therapy outcome for anxiety disorders in a routine clinical setting.在常规临床环境中对焦虑症认知行为疗法疗效的一般预测因素的调查。
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 25;6(3):e010898. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010898.
2
Do emotion regulation, attentional control, and attachment style predict response to cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders? - an investigation in clinical settings.情绪调节、注意控制和依恋风格是否能预测焦虑障碍认知行为治疗的反应?——临床环境中的一项研究。
Psychother Res. 2019 Nov;29(8):999-1009. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2018.1425933. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
3
A comparison of emotion-focused therapy and cognitive-behavioural therapy in the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.情绪聚焦疗法与认知行为疗法治疗广泛性焦虑症的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Sep 19;19(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2892-0.
4
Group cognitive behavioural therapy with virtual reality exposure versus group cognitive behavioural therapy with in vivo exposure for social anxiety disorder and agoraphobia: a protocol for a randomised clinical trial.虚拟现实暴露的团体认知行为疗法与现场暴露的团体认知行为疗法治疗社交焦虑症和广场恐惧症的随机临床试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 2;12(2):e051147. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051147.
5
A cognitive-behavioral intervention for emotion regulation in adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项针对高功能自闭症谱系障碍成人情绪调节的认知行为干预:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2013 Jul 23;14:231. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-231.
6
Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults.成人焦虑症的治疗师辅助互联网认知行为疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 5(3):CD011565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011565.
7
Randomised controlled trial of cultural-adapted and programme-adopted cognitive behavioural therapy for children and adolescents' anxiety in Japan: protocol for a Multi-, Inter-, and Cross-cultural Clinical Child Study (MIXCS).日本儿童和青少年焦虑的文化适应和方案适应认知行为疗法的随机对照试验:多、跨、文化临床儿童研究(MIXCS)方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 18;13(7):e068855. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068855.
8
Randomised controlled trial on the effect of internet-delivered computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy on patients with insomnia who remain symptomatic following hypnotics: a study protocol.一项关于互联网提供的计算机化认知行为疗法对使用催眠药物后仍有症状的失眠患者影响的随机对照试验:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 30;8(1):e018220. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018220.
9
Improving distress in dialysis (iDiD): a feasibility two-arm parallel randomised controlled trial of an online cognitive behavioural therapy intervention with and without therapist-led telephone support for psychological distress in patients undergoing haemodialysis.改善透析患者的心理困扰(iDiD):一项可行性双臂平行随机对照试验,针对接受血液透析的患者,比较有和没有治疗师引导的电话支持的在线认知行为疗法干预对心理困扰的影响。
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 12;6(4):e011286. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011286.
10
Optimizing Outcomes in Psychotherapy for Anxiety Disorders Using Smartphone-Based and Passive Sensing Features: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.使用基于智能手机的和被动感知特征优化焦虑障碍心理治疗的结果:一项随机对照试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 May 14;13:e42547. doi: 10.2196/42547.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of predictors and moderators of improvement in cognitive-behavioral therapy for panic disorder and agoraphobia.惊恐障碍和场所恐惧症认知行为治疗中改善的预测因子和调节因子的系统评价。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Dec;42:179-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
2
Response rates for CBT for anxiety disorders: Need for standardized criteria.焦虑障碍认知行为治疗的反应率:需要标准化标准。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Dec;42:72-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
3
The state of personalized treatment for anxiety disorders: A systematic review of treatment moderators.焦虑障碍的个性化治疗现状:治疗调节因素的系统评价。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Jun;38:39-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
4
Developing practice-based evidence: benefits, challenges, and tensions.发展基于实践的证据:益处、挑战与矛盾
Psychother Res. 2015;25(1):20-31. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2013.861093. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
5
Attentional bias and emotional reactivity as predictors and moderators of behavioral treatment for social phobia.注意偏向和情绪反应性作为社交恐惧症行为治疗的预测因素和调节因素
Behav Res Ther. 2013 Oct;51(10):669-79. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
6
Cost-effectiveness of CBT, SSRI, and CBT+SSRI in the treatment for panic disorder.认知行为疗法(CBT)、选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)以及CBT联合SSRI治疗惊恐障碍的成本效益分析
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2014 Apr;129(4):286-95. doi: 10.1111/acps.12169. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
7
Twelve-month and lifetime prevalence and lifetime morbid risk of anxiety and mood disorders in the United States.美国焦虑和心境障碍的 12 个月和终生患病率以及终生患病风险。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2012 Sep;21(3):169-84. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1359. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
8
Moderators and non-specific predictors of treatment outcome for anxiety disorders: a comparison of cognitive behavioral therapy to acceptance and commitment therapy.焦虑障碍治疗结果的调节因素和非特异性预测因素:认知行为疗法与接纳与承诺疗法的比较。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Oct;80(5):786-99. doi: 10.1037/a0029418. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
9
Non-adherence and non-response in the treatment of anxiety disorders.焦虑障碍治疗中的不依从和无反应。
J Anxiety Disord. 2012 Jun;26(5):583-9. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.02.010. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
10
Attentional capture by emotional faces is contingent on attentional control settings.情绪面孔的注意捕获取决于注意控制设置。
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(7):1223-37. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.645279. Epub 2012 Mar 15.

在常规临床环境中对焦虑症认知行为疗法疗效的一般预测因素的调查。

An investigation of general predictors for cognitive-behavioural therapy outcome for anxiety disorders in a routine clinical setting.

作者信息

Nielsen Sara Kerstine Kaya, Vangkilde Signe, Wolitzky-Taylor Kate B, Daniel Sarah Ingrid Franksdatter, Hageman Ida

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences Semel Institute, University of California, California, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 25;6(3):e010898. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010898.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010898
PMID:27016248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4809100/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) is effective for treating anxiety disorders and is offered in most mental health services around the world. However, a relatively large number of patients with anxiety disorders do not benefit from CBT, experience relapses or drop out. Reliable predictors of treatment effects are lacking. The aim of this study is to investigate the predictive value of emotion regulation and attentional control for CBT outcome in a routine setting.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In this prospective and practice-based study, 112 patients with anxiety disorders referred for manual-based group CBT at two psychiatric outpatient clinics will be recruited. Emotion regulation, severity of anxiety and attentional control will be assessed with self-report measures and with an experimental computer-based attentional control task at baseline, post-treatment and at a 6-month follow-up. Emotion regulation will be measured with Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, severity of anxiety will be assessed with Beck Anxiety Inventory and attentional control will be measured with the self-report questionnaire, Attention Control Scale, and with an experimental computer-based attentional control task based on theory of visual attention. Data will be analysed using multilevel mixed-effects modelling.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study is approved by the Danish National Ethical Board, the Department of Psychology Ethical Board, University of Copenhagen and by the Danish Data Protection Agency. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications and conference presentations. The Danish Committee System on Health Research Ethics has been notified about the project.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02638363.

摘要

引言

认知行为疗法(CBT)在治疗焦虑症方面很有效,且在全球大多数心理健康服务机构中都有提供。然而,有相当数量的焦虑症患者无法从CBT中获益,会经历复发或退出治疗。目前缺乏可靠的治疗效果预测指标。本研究的目的是在常规环境中调查情绪调节和注意力控制对CBT治疗结果的预测价值。

方法与分析

在这项基于实践的前瞻性研究中,将招募112名在两家精神科门诊接受基于手册的团体CBT治疗的焦虑症患者。在基线、治疗后和6个月随访时,将通过自我报告测量以及基于计算机的注意力控制实验任务来评估情绪调节、焦虑严重程度和注意力控制。情绪调节将通过《情绪调节困难问卷》进行测量,焦虑严重程度将通过《贝克焦虑量表》进行评估,注意力控制将通过自我报告问卷《注意力控制量表》以及基于视觉注意理论的计算机注意力控制实验任务进行测量。数据将使用多层次混合效应模型进行分析。

伦理与传播

该研究已获得丹麦国家伦理委员会、哥本哈根大学心理学系伦理委员会以及丹麦数据保护局的批准。研究结果将通过同行评审的期刊出版物和会议报告进行传播。已将该项目通知丹麦健康研究伦理委员会系统。

试验注册号

NCT02638363。