Suppr超能文献

注意偏向在问题赌徒和非问题赌徒中的差异。

Attentional biases in problem and non-problem gamblers.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy.

Department of Psychology, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2016 Jul 1;198:135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.03.009. Epub 2016 Mar 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

From a cognitive perspective, attentional biases are deemed as factors responsible in the onset and development of gambling disorder. However, knowledge relating to attentional processes in gambling is scarce and studies to date have reported contrasting results. Moreover, no study has ever examined which component and what type of bias are involved in attentional bias in gambling.

METHODS

In the present study, 108 Italian participants, equally divided into problem and non-problem gamblers, were administered a modified Posner Task, an attentional paradigm in which - through the manipulation of stimuli presentation time - it is possible to measure both initial orienting and maintenance of attention. In addition to the experimental task, participants completed self-report measures involving (i) craving (Gambling Craving Scale), (ii) depression, anxiety and stress (Depression Anxiety Stress Scale) and (iii) emotional dysregulation (Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale).

RESULTS

Analyses revealed facilitation in detecting gambling-related stimuli at the encoding level in problem gamblers but not in non-problem gamblers. Compared to non-problem gamblers, problem gamblers also reported higher levels of craving, emotional dysregulation, and negative mood states. Furthermore, all measures correlated with the gambling severity.

LIMITATIONS

The use of indirect measure of attentional bias could be less accurate compared to direct measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The facilitation in detecting gambling-related stimuli in problem gamblers and the correlation between subjective craving and facilitation bias suggests that attentional bias could not be due to a conditioning process but that motivational factors such as craving could induce addicted-related seeking-behaviors.

摘要

背景

从认知的角度来看,注意偏差被认为是导致赌博障碍发生和发展的因素。然而,关于赌博注意过程的知识很少,迄今为止的研究报告结果相互矛盾。此外,尚无研究探讨注意偏差中涉及哪些成分和哪种偏差。

方法

在本研究中,108 名意大利参与者被分为问题赌徒和非问题赌徒两组,他们接受了改良版的 Posner 任务,这是一种注意范式,通过操纵刺激呈现时间,可以测量初始定向和注意力的维持。除了实验任务外,参与者还完成了自我报告的测量,包括(i)渴望(赌博渴望量表)、(ii)抑郁、焦虑和压力(抑郁焦虑压力量表)和(iii)情绪调节困难(情绪调节困难量表)。

结果

分析显示,问题赌徒在编码阶段对赌博相关刺激的检测更为容易,但非问题赌徒则不然。与非问题赌徒相比,问题赌徒报告的渴望、情绪调节困难和负面情绪状态水平更高。此外,所有测量结果都与赌博严重程度相关。

局限性

与直接测量相比,间接测量注意偏差可能不太准确。

结论

问题赌徒对赌博相关刺激的检测更容易,以及主观渴望与易化偏差之间的相关性表明,注意偏差可能不是由于条件作用过程引起的,而是由于渴望等动机因素引起的成瘾相关寻求行为。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验