• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情感冲动性调节了电子游戏赌博机(EGM)玩家赌博严重程度与注意力偏向之间的关系。

Affective impulsivity moderates the relationship between disordered gambling severity and attentional bias in electronic gaming machine (EGM) players.

机构信息

1 Department of Psychology, Toronto Metropolitan University (Formerly Ryerson University), Toronto, Canada.

2 Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

J Behav Addict. 2022 Jun 29;11(2):386-395. doi: 10.1556/2006.2022.00043. Print 2022 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1556/2006.2022.00043
PMID:35895477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9295233/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Attentional bias to gambling-related stimuli is associated with increased severity of gambling disorder. However, the addiction-related moderators of attentional bias among those who gamble are largely unknown. Impulsivity is associated with attentional bias among those who abuse substances, and we hypothesized that impulsivity would moderate the relationship between disordered electronic gaming machine (EGM) gambling and attentional bias.

METHODS

We tested whether facets of impulsivity, as measured by the UPPS-P (positive urgency, negative urgency, sensation seeking, lack of perseverance, lack of premeditation) and the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (cognitive, motor, non-planning) moderated the relationship between increased severity of gambling disorder, as measured by the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI), and attentional bias. Seventy-five EGM players participated in a free-viewing eye-tracking paradigm to measure attentional bias to EGM images.

RESULTS

Attentional bias was significantly correlated with Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11) motor, positive urgency, and negative urgency. Only positive and negative urgency moderated the relationship between PGSI scores and attentional bias. For participants with high PGSI scores, higher positive and negative urgency were associated with larger attentional biases to EGM stimuli.

DISCUSSION

The results indicate that affective impulsivity is an important contributor to the association between gambling disorder and attentional bias.

摘要

背景与目的

对赌博相关刺激的注意力偏差与赌博障碍严重程度的增加有关。然而,在赌博者中,与成瘾相关的注意力偏差的调节因素在很大程度上尚不清楚。冲动性与滥用物质者的注意力偏差有关,我们假设冲动性会调节不规律电子游戏赌博与注意力偏差之间的关系。

方法

我们测试了 UPPS-P(积极冲动、消极冲动、寻求刺激、缺乏毅力、缺乏预谋)和 Barratt 冲动量表-11(认知、运动、无计划)的冲动特质是否调节了赌博障碍严重程度的增加,由赌博问题严重程度指数(PGSI)衡量,以及注意力偏差。75 名电子游戏玩家参与了自由观看眼动追踪范式,以测量对电子游戏图像的注意力偏差。

结果

注意力偏差与 Barratt 冲动量表-11(BIS-11)运动、积极冲动和消极冲动显著相关。只有积极和消极冲动调节了 PGSI 分数与注意力偏差之间的关系。对于 PGSI 得分较高的参与者,较高的积极和消极冲动与对电子游戏刺激的更大注意力偏差相关。

讨论

结果表明,情感冲动性是赌博障碍和注意力偏差之间关联的一个重要贡献因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/886d/9295233/5fe1642fb578/jba-11-386-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/886d/9295233/5e81e67ab948/jba-11-386-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/886d/9295233/5fe1642fb578/jba-11-386-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/886d/9295233/5e81e67ab948/jba-11-386-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/886d/9295233/5fe1642fb578/jba-11-386-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Affective impulsivity moderates the relationship between disordered gambling severity and attentional bias in electronic gaming machine (EGM) players.情感冲动性调节了电子游戏赌博机(EGM)玩家赌博严重程度与注意力偏向之间的关系。
J Behav Addict. 2022 Jun 29;11(2):386-395. doi: 10.1556/2006.2022.00043. Print 2022 Jul 13.
2
Gambling-related psychological predictors and moderators of attentional bias among electronic gaming machine players.电子游戏玩家注意偏向的赌博相关心理预测因子和调节因子。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2021 Dec;35(8):961-973. doi: 10.1037/adb0000716. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
3
Assessing the role of impulsivity in smoking & non-smoking disordered gamblers.评估冲动性在吸烟及非吸烟的问题赌徒中的作用。
Addict Behav. 2017 Jul;70:35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
4
Impulsivity and Gambling Type Among Treatment-Seeking Disordered Gamblers: An Explorative Study.求治性赌博障碍者的冲动性与赌博类型:一项探索性研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Dec;34(4):1341-1354. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9764-0.
5
Is gambling disorder associated with impulsivity traits measured by the UPPS-P and is this association moderated by sex and age?赌博障碍是否与 UPPS-P 测量的冲动特质有关,这种关联是否受到性别和年龄的调节?
Compr Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;72:106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
6
A Systematic Review of Eye-Tracking Studies of Gambling-Related Attentional Biases.眼动追踪研究中与赌博相关的注意偏差的系统评价。
J Gambl Stud. 2023 Jun;39(2):813-828. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10161-3. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
7
Comparison of impulsivity in non-problem, at-risk and problem gamblers.非问题、有风险和问题赌徒的冲动性比较。
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 15;6:39233. doi: 10.1038/srep39233.
8
Proximal and Distal Risk Factors for Gambling Problems Specifically Associated with Electronic Gaming Machines.与电子游戏机相关的赌博问题的近端和远端风险因素。
J Gambl Stud. 2020 Mar;36(1):277-295. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09867-8.
9
Impulsivity and cognitive distortions in different clinical phenotypes of gambling disorder: Profiles and longitudinal prediction of treatment outcomes.冲动性和认知扭曲在不同临床表型的赌博障碍中的表现:治疗结果的特征和纵向预测。
Eur Psychiatry. 2019 Sep;61:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
10
A Comparison of Self-Reported Impulsivity in Gambling Disorder and Bipolar Disorder.赌博障碍与双相障碍患者自我报告冲动的比较。
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Mar;35(1):339-350. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9808-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Focal attention peaks and laterality bias in problem gamblers: an eye-tracking investigation.问题赌徒的焦点注意力峰值和偏侧性偏差:一项眼动追踪研究。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2025 Dec;19(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s11571-025-10238-w. Epub 2025 Mar 22.
2
Neurophysiological Correlates of Near-Wins in Gambling: A Systematic Literature Review.赌博中险些获胜的神经生理学关联:一项系统文献综述
J Gambl Stud. 2025 Mar;41(1):5-35. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10327-1. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
3
Decomposition of Reinforcement Learning Deficits in Disordered Gambling via Drift Diffusion Modeling and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

本文引用的文献

1
Gambling-related psychological predictors and moderators of attentional bias among electronic gaming machine players.电子游戏玩家注意偏向的赌博相关心理预测因子和调节因子。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2021 Dec;35(8):961-973. doi: 10.1037/adb0000716. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
2
Disordered gambling and attentional bias: The mediating role of risk-taking.赌博障碍与注意偏向:冒险行为的中介作用。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Jul 1;272:496-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.144. Epub 2020 May 1.
3
From sign-tracking to attentional bias: Implications for gambling and substance use disorders.
通过漂移扩散模型和功能磁共振成像分解无序赌博中强化学习缺陷
Comput Psychiatr. 2024 Mar 20;8(1):23-45. doi: 10.5334/cpsy.104. eCollection 2024.
4
How We Lost 90% of Participants on a Bad Bet: Results from a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial on Cognitive Bias Modification in Problem Gamblers.我们如何在一场糟糕的赌注中失去了90%的参与者:一项针对问题赌徒认知偏差修正的试点随机对照试验的结果。
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Jun;40(2):521-554. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10263-6. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
5
A Systematic Review of Attentional Bias in Problem Gambling.问题性赌博注意偏向的系统评价
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Jun;40(2):493-519. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10260-9. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
6
A Systematic Review of Eye-Tracking Studies of Gambling-Related Attentional Biases.眼动追踪研究中与赌博相关的注意偏差的系统评价。
J Gambl Stud. 2023 Jun;39(2):813-828. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10161-3. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
从标志追踪到注意力偏向:对赌博和物质使用障碍的影响。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 20;99:109861. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.109861. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
4
Common neurobiological and psychological underpinnings of gambling and substance-use disorders.赌博和物质使用障碍的常见神经生物学和心理学基础。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 20;99:109847. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.109847. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
5
Compulsivity and impulsivity traits linked to attenuated developmental frontostriatal myelination trajectories.与发育性额-纹状体髓鞘形成轨迹减弱相关的强迫性和冲动性特征。
Nat Neurosci. 2019 Jun;22(6):992-999. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0394-3. Epub 2019 May 13.
6
Impulsivity in Gambling Disorder and problem gambling: a meta-analysis.赌博障碍和问题赌博中的冲动性:一项荟萃分析。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Jul;44(8):1354-1361. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0393-9. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
7
Facilitated attention for gambling cues in adolescent problem gamblers: An experimental study.青少年问题赌徒对赌博线索的易化注意:一项实验研究。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Jun 1;252:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
8
Component Model of Addiction Treatment: A Pragmatic Transdiagnostic Treatment Model of Behavioral and Substance Addictions.成瘾治疗的成分模型:行为成瘾和物质成瘾的实用跨诊断治疗模型。
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 31;9:406. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00406. eCollection 2018.
9
Impulsivity and Gambling Type Among Treatment-Seeking Disordered Gamblers: An Explorative Study.求治性赌博障碍者的冲动性与赌博类型:一项探索性研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Dec;34(4):1341-1354. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9764-0.
10
The specificity of attentional biases by type of gambling: An eye-tracking study.不同类型赌博的注意偏向特异性:一项眼动追踪研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 31;13(1):e0190614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190614. eCollection 2018.