Takahashi Toshiyuki, Hanakita Junya, Kawaoka Taigo, Ohtake Yasufumi, Adachi Hiromasa, Shimizu Kampei
Spinal Disorders Center, Fujieda Heisei Memorial Hospital.
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2016 Aug 15;56(8):485-92. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2015-0261. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
Instrumented spinal fixation is ordinarily required in patients who present with myelopathy or cauda equina syndrome secondary to vertebral collapse following osteoporotic thoracolumbar fracture. Posterior spinal fixation is a major surgical option, and partial vertebral osteotomy (PVO) through a posterior approach is occasionally reasonable for achievement of complete neural decompression and improvement of excessive local kyphosis. However, the indications and need for PVO remain unclear. The objectives of this retrospective study were to determine the efficacy and safety of posterior spinal fixation with or without PVO for osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral collapse and identify patients who require neural decompression and alignment correction by PVO. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 20 patients (13 females, 7 males; mean age, 67.1 years) who underwent instrumented posterior fixation for osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fracture. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the Japanese Orthopedic Association score and visual analog scale scores in the lumbar and leg areas. PVO was added with posterior spinal fixation in eight patients because neural decompression was incomplete after laminectomy as indicated by intraoperative echo imaging. Neurological and functional recovery significantly improved during follow-up. Clinical outcomes in patients who underwent PVO were similar to those in patients who did not undergo PVO. However, correction of the local kyphotic angle and improvement of spinal canal compromise after surgery was significant in patients who underwent PVO. The patients who required PVO had a less local kyphotic angle in the supine position and higher occupation rate of the fractured fragment in the spinal canal in the preoperative examination.
对于因骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折导致椎体塌陷继发脊髓病或马尾综合征的患者,通常需要进行器械辅助脊柱固定。后路脊柱固定是一种主要的手术选择,通过后路进行部分椎体截骨术(PVO)偶尔对于实现完全神经减压和改善局部过度后凸是合理的。然而,PVO的适应症和必要性仍不明确。这项回顾性研究的目的是确定后路脊柱固定联合或不联合PVO治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎椎体塌陷的疗效和安全性,并确定需要通过PVO进行神经减压和矫正畸形的患者。我们回顾性分析了20例(13例女性,7例男性;平均年龄67.1岁)因骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折接受器械辅助后路固定手术患者的临床记录。通过日本骨科协会评分以及腰部和腿部区域的视觉模拟量表评分评估临床结果。8例患者在进行后路脊柱固定时加做了PVO,因为术中超声成像显示椎板切除术后神经减压不完全。随访期间神经功能和功能恢复明显改善。接受PVO的患者与未接受PVO的患者临床结果相似。然而,接受PVO的患者术后局部后凸角的矫正和椎管狭窄的改善更为显著。术前检查显示,需要进行PVO的患者仰卧位时局部后凸角较小,椎管内骨折块占位率较高。