Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokkaido University Hospital, North-15, West-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8638, Japan.
Spine J. 2013 Dec;13(12):1726-32. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.05.041. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
With the increase of the elderly population, osteoporotic vertebral fractures have been frequently reported. Surgical intervention is usually recommended in osteoporotic vertebral collapse with neurologic deficits. However, very few reports on surgical interventions exist.
To compare surgical results of anterior and posterior procedures for treating osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral collapse with sustained neurologic deficits.
Retrospective comparative study.
Fifty patients who sustained osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral collapse with neurologic deficits were treated either by anterior decompression and strut graft (n=32) or by posterior decompression and pedicle screw fixation with vertebroplasty (n=18).
Incidence of complications, sagittal Cobb angle, spinal canal encroachment, and Japanese Orthopedic Association score.
The authors retrospectively reviewed the results of a consecutive series of patients undergoing anterior decompression and strut graft or posterior decompression and pedicle screw fixation with vertebroplasty for osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral collapse with neurologic deficits. Operative notes, clinical charts, and radiographs were analyzed.
Operative time was similar between the groups, but intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the posterior group. All patients showed neurologic recovery. No significant difference was observed in the neurologic improvement, kyphosis correction angle, and loss of correction. Perioperative respiratory complications were found in 11 patients (34%) in the anterior group. In the anterior group, early posterior reinforcement was required in patients with very low bone density below 0.60 g/cm(2) and/or in those with three segments of instrumentation for two vertebral collapses. Posterior group patients did not undergo additional surgery.
Anterior reconstruction for osteoporotic vertebral collapse is significant because anterior elements, particularly those at the thoracolumbar junction, play a major role in load bearing. However, difficulties arise when anterior reconstruction is performed in cases with very low bone density and in those with multiple vertebral collapse.
随着老年人口的增加,骨质疏松性椎体骨折的报道越来越多。对于伴有神经功能缺损的骨质疏松性椎体塌陷,通常建议手术干预。然而,关于手术干预的报道很少。
比较前后入路治疗伴有持续神经功能缺损的骨质疏松性胸腰椎椎体塌陷的手术效果。
回顾性比较研究。
50 例伴有神经功能缺损的骨质疏松性胸腰椎椎体塌陷患者,分别采用前路减压支撑植骨(n=32)或后路减压椎弓根螺钉固定加骨水泥成形术(n=18)治疗。
并发症发生率、矢状面 Cobb 角、椎管侵占率和日本矫形协会评分。
作者回顾性分析了连续接受前路减压支撑植骨或后路减压椎弓根螺钉固定加骨水泥成形术治疗伴有神经功能缺损的骨质疏松性胸腰椎椎体塌陷的患者的结果。分析手术记录、临床病历和影像学资料。
两组手术时间相似,但后路组术中出血量明显减少。所有患者均出现神经恢复。神经改善、后凸矫正角度和矫正丢失无显著差异。前路组 11 例(34%)患者发生围手术期呼吸系统并发症。在前路组,对于骨密度低于 0.60 g/cm²的患者或需要进行 3 个节段内固定治疗 2 个椎体塌陷的患者,需要早期进行后路强化。后路组患者未进行额外手术。
骨质疏松性椎体塌陷的前路重建意义重大,因为前柱,特别是胸腰椎交界处的前柱,在负重中起主要作用。然而,当在骨密度非常低和多个椎体塌陷的情况下进行前路重建时,会出现困难。