Popplow Marcus
Isis. 2015 Dec;106(4):848-56. doi: 10.1086/684653.
Recent critical approaches to what has conventionally been described as "scientific" and "technical" knowledge in early modern Europe have provided a wealth of new insights. So far, the various analytical concepts suggested by these studies have not yet been comprehensively discussed. The present essay argues that such comprehensive approaches might prove of special value for long-term and cross-cultural reflections on technology-related knowledge. As heuristic tools, the notions of "formalization" and "interaction" are proposed as part of alternative narratives to those highlighting the emergence of "science" as the most relevant development for technology-related knowledge in early modern Europe.
最近,针对近代早期欧洲传统上被描述为“科学”和“技术”知识的批判性研究方法带来了丰富的新见解。到目前为止,这些研究提出的各种分析概念尚未得到全面讨论。本文认为,这种全面的方法可能对与技术相关知识的长期和跨文化反思具有特殊价值。作为启发式工具,“形式化”和“互动”的概念被提出来,作为与那些强调“科学”的出现是近代早期欧洲与技术相关知识最相关发展的叙事不同的替代叙事的一部分。