Webber C E
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chedoke-McMaster Hospitals, Hamilton, Ontario.
Can Assoc Radiol J. 1989 Apr;40(2):87-91.
The accuracy of a commercial dual photon densitometer was found to be within 3.0% of true values when measured using a cadaver spine. The precision, the ratio of standard deviation to mean derived from repeated measurements of a tissue-equivalent phantom spine, was 1.6%. Patient size and the age of the radioisotope source had no discernable effect upon bone mineral mass measurements. The intervention of the technologist during data analysis can influence the determination of bone mineral mass in approximately 40% of measurements. When a lumbar spine phantom was measured on six different densitometers manufactured by three different companies, within-manufacturer variations of between 4% and 7% were found. Bone mineral densities differed by up to 30% between manufacturers. Values of lumbar spine mineral mass were measured for 206 apparently normal women. The resultant normal range was similar to others documented by the manufacturer. The differences between these studies and a published study of 892 normal women can best be explained on the basis of intermanufacturer differences.
使用尸体脊柱进行测量时,发现商用双能光子骨密度仪的测量结果与真实值的偏差在3.0%以内。通过对组织等效体模脊柱进行重复测量得出的精度(标准偏差与平均值之比)为1.6%。患者体型和放射性同位素源的使用时长对骨矿物质含量测量没有明显影响。在大约40%的测量中,技术人员在数据分析过程中的干预会影响骨矿物质含量的测定。当使用三个不同公司生产的六种不同骨密度仪对腰椎体模进行测量时,发现同一厂家生产的仪器测量结果差异在4%至7%之间。不同厂家生产的骨密度仪测量的骨矿物质密度差异高达30%。对206名看似正常的女性测量了腰椎矿物质含量。所得出的正常范围与厂家记录的其他范围相似。这些研究与一项针对892名正常女性的已发表研究之间的差异,最好基于不同厂家之间的差异来解释。