de Barros e Silva Pedro Gabriel Melo, Ribeiro Henrique Barbosa, Baruzzi Antônio Claudio do Amaral, da Silva Expedito Eustáquio Ribeiro
Hospital TotalCor, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2016 Mar;106(3):236-46. doi: 10.5935/abc.20160042.
Dual antiplatelet therapy is a well-established treatment in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), with class I of recommendation (level of evidence A) in current national and international guidelines. Nonetheless, these guidelines are not precise or consensual regarding the best time to start the second antiplatelet agent. The evidences are conflicting, and after more than a decade using clopidogrel in this scenario, benefits from the routine pretreatment, i.e. without knowing the coronary anatomy, with dual antiplatelet therapy remain uncertain. The recommendation for the upfront treatment with clopidogrel in NSTE-ACS is based on the reduction of non-fatal events in studies that used the conservative strategy with eventual invasive stratification, after many days of the acute event. This approach is different from the current management of these patients, considering the established benefits from the early invasive strategy, especially in moderate to high-risk patients. The only randomized study to date that specifically tested the pretreatment in NSTE-ACS in the context of early invasive strategy, used prasugrel, and it did not show any benefit in reducing ischemic events with pretreatment. On the contrary, its administration increased the risk of bleeding events. This study has brought the pretreatment again into discussion, and led to changes in recent guidelines of the American and European cardiology societies. In this paper, the authors review the main evidence of the pretreatment with dual antiplatelet therapy in NSTE-ACS.
双联抗血小板治疗是非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者中一种成熟的治疗方法,在当前国内外指南中为I类推荐(证据级别A)。尽管如此,这些指南对于开始使用第二种抗血小板药物的最佳时间并不精确,也未达成共识。证据相互矛盾,在这种情况下使用氯吡格雷十多年后,在不了解冠状动脉解剖结构的情况下进行双联抗血小板治疗的常规预处理的益处仍不明确。NSTE-ACS中氯吡格雷预治疗的推荐基于在急性事件发生多日后采用保守策略并最终进行有创分层的研究中,非致命事件的减少。考虑到早期有创策略已确立的益处,尤其是在中高危患者中,这种方法与目前对这些患者的管理不同。迄今为止,唯一一项在早期有创策略背景下专门测试NSTE-ACS预治疗的随机研究使用了普拉格雷,该研究未显示预治疗在减少缺血事件方面有任何益处。相反,其应用增加了出血事件的风险。这项研究再次引发了对预治疗的讨论,并导致美国和欧洲心脏病学会近期指南的改变。在本文中,作者回顾了NSTE-ACS双联抗血小板预治疗的主要证据。