• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征中第二种抗血小板药物的最佳用药时间是什么时候?

When is the Best Time for the Second Antiplatelet Agent in Non-St Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome?

作者信息

de Barros e Silva Pedro Gabriel Melo, Ribeiro Henrique Barbosa, Baruzzi Antônio Claudio do Amaral, da Silva Expedito Eustáquio Ribeiro

机构信息

Hospital TotalCor, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Arq Bras Cardiol. 2016 Mar;106(3):236-46. doi: 10.5935/abc.20160042.

DOI:10.5935/abc.20160042
PMID:27027367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4811279/
Abstract

Dual antiplatelet therapy is a well-established treatment in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), with class I of recommendation (level of evidence A) in current national and international guidelines. Nonetheless, these guidelines are not precise or consensual regarding the best time to start the second antiplatelet agent. The evidences are conflicting, and after more than a decade using clopidogrel in this scenario, benefits from the routine pretreatment, i.e. without knowing the coronary anatomy, with dual antiplatelet therapy remain uncertain. The recommendation for the upfront treatment with clopidogrel in NSTE-ACS is based on the reduction of non-fatal events in studies that used the conservative strategy with eventual invasive stratification, after many days of the acute event. This approach is different from the current management of these patients, considering the established benefits from the early invasive strategy, especially in moderate to high-risk patients. The only randomized study to date that specifically tested the pretreatment in NSTE-ACS in the context of early invasive strategy, used prasugrel, and it did not show any benefit in reducing ischemic events with pretreatment. On the contrary, its administration increased the risk of bleeding events. This study has brought the pretreatment again into discussion, and led to changes in recent guidelines of the American and European cardiology societies. In this paper, the authors review the main evidence of the pretreatment with dual antiplatelet therapy in NSTE-ACS.

摘要

双联抗血小板治疗是非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者中一种成熟的治疗方法,在当前国内外指南中为I类推荐(证据级别A)。尽管如此,这些指南对于开始使用第二种抗血小板药物的最佳时间并不精确,也未达成共识。证据相互矛盾,在这种情况下使用氯吡格雷十多年后,在不了解冠状动脉解剖结构的情况下进行双联抗血小板治疗的常规预处理的益处仍不明确。NSTE-ACS中氯吡格雷预治疗的推荐基于在急性事件发生多日后采用保守策略并最终进行有创分层的研究中,非致命事件的减少。考虑到早期有创策略已确立的益处,尤其是在中高危患者中,这种方法与目前对这些患者的管理不同。迄今为止,唯一一项在早期有创策略背景下专门测试NSTE-ACS预治疗的随机研究使用了普拉格雷,该研究未显示预治疗在减少缺血事件方面有任何益处。相反,其应用增加了出血事件的风险。这项研究再次引发了对预治疗的讨论,并导致美国和欧洲心脏病学会近期指南的改变。在本文中,作者回顾了NSTE-ACS双联抗血小板预治疗的主要证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef8/4811279/8dc719a8d105/abc-106-03-0236-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef8/4811279/266d30086000/abc-106-03-0236-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef8/4811279/aeafeb2fa86d/abc-106-03-0236-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef8/4811279/8dc719a8d105/abc-106-03-0236-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef8/4811279/266d30086000/abc-106-03-0236-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef8/4811279/aeafeb2fa86d/abc-106-03-0236-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef8/4811279/8dc719a8d105/abc-106-03-0236-g03.jpg

相似文献

1
When is the Best Time for the Second Antiplatelet Agent in Non-St Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome?非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征中第二种抗血小板药物的最佳用药时间是什么时候?
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2016 Mar;106(3):236-46. doi: 10.5935/abc.20160042.
2
Benefits and risks of clopidogrel use in patients with coronary artery disease: evidence from randomized studies and registries.氯吡格雷用于冠心病患者的获益与风险:来自随机研究和注册登记研究的证据
Clin Ther. 2008;30 Pt 2:2191-202. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.12.001.
3
Antithrombotic therapy for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition).非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的抗栓治疗:美国胸科医师学会循证临床实践指南(第8版)
Chest. 2008 Jun;133(6 Suppl):670S-707S. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0691.
4
Platelet inhibitors in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention: glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, clopidogrel, or both?非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的血小板抑制剂:糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂、氯吡格雷,还是两者联用?
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2006;2(1):39-48. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.2006.2.1.39.
5
Study design and rationale of a comparison of prasugrel and clopidogrel in medically managed patients with unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the TaRgeted platelet Inhibition to cLarify the Optimal strateGy to medicallY manage Acute Coronary Syndromes (TRILOGY ACS) trial.研究设计和原理:比较普拉格雷和氯吡格雷在接受药物治疗的不稳定型心绞痛/非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的疗效:以血小板靶向抑制明确最佳策略优化急性冠状动脉综合征药物治疗(TRILOGY ACS)试验。
Am Heart J. 2010 Jul;160(1):16-22.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.04.022.
6
Prasugrel versus clopidogrel: new management strategies for acute coronary syndrome.普拉格雷与氯吡格雷:急性冠脉综合征的新治疗策略。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013 Sep-Oct;28(5):483-94. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e31826173ba.
7
Ticagrelor or prasugrel versus clopidogrel in elderly patients with an acute coronary syndrome: Optimization of antiplatelet treatment in patients 70 years and older--rationale and design of the POPular AGE study.替格瑞洛或普拉格雷与氯吡格雷用于老年急性冠脉综合征患者:70岁及以上患者抗血小板治疗的优化——POPular AGE研究的原理与设计
Am Heart J. 2015 Nov;170(5):981-985.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.030. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
8
Triple antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes.急性冠脉综合征的三联抗血小板治疗。
Drugs. 2011 Sep 10;71(13):1703-19. doi: 10.2165/11594100-000000000-00000.
9
The effect of different treatment durations of clopidogrel in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and value of information analysis.氯吡格雷不同治疗时长对非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的影响:一项系统评价与信息分析价值
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Jun;13(31):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-77. doi: 10.3310/hta13310.
10
Dual antiplatelet therapy in patients requiring urgent coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a position statement of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society.需要紧急冠状动脉旁路移植手术的患者的双联抗血小板治疗:加拿大心血管学会的立场声明。
Can J Cardiol. 2009 Dec;25(12):683-9. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(09)70527-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of cangrelor as compared to ticagrelor in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI): a systematic review and meta-analysis.与替格瑞洛相比,坎格雷洛在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Egypt Heart J. 2024 Apr 16;76(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s43044-024-00480-8.
2
2020 Top 10 Original Articles in the Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia and the Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia.2020年巴西心脏病学档案和葡萄牙心脏病学杂志十大原创文章。
Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021 Aug 14;40(12):903-10. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2021.06.002.
3
2020 Top 10 Original Articles in the Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia and the Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia.

本文引用的文献

1
Reappraisal of thienopyridine pretreatment in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者噻吩并吡啶预处理的重新评估:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2014 Oct 24;349:g6269. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6269.
2
Effect of prasugrel pre-treatment strategy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for NSTEMI: the ACCOAST-PCI study.在非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中普拉格雷预处理策略的效果:ACCOAST-PCI 研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):2563-2571. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.08.053.
3
Pretreatment with P2Y12 inhibitors in non-ST-Segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome: an outdated and harmful strategy.
《巴西心脏病学档案》和《葡萄牙心脏病学杂志》2020年十大原创文章。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021 Jun;116(6):1153-1160. doi: 10.36660/abc.20210372.
非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征中P2Y12抑制剂的预处理:一种过时且有害的策略。
Circulation. 2014 Nov 18;130(21):1904-14; discussion 1914. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011320.
4
Pretreatment with P2Y12 inhibitors in non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome is clinically justified.在非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征中,使用P2Y12抑制剂进行预处理在临床上是合理的。
Circulation. 2014 Nov 18;130(21):1891-903; discussion 1903. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011319.
5
2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2014 Dec 23;130(25):e344-426. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000134. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
6
Prehospital ticagrelor in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.院前替格瑞洛在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371(11):1016-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1407024. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
7
2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).2014 欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)心肌血运重建特别工作组。由欧洲经皮心血管介入协会(EAPCI)提供特别贡献制定。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Oct;46(4):517-92. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu366. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
8
Adenosine-mediated effects of ticagrelor: evidence and potential clinical relevance.替格瑞洛介导的腺苷作用:证据与潜在临床意义。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jun 17;63(23):2503-2509. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.031. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
9
Early post-discharge bleeding and antiplatelet therapy discontinuation among acute myocardial infarction patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者出院后早期出血及抗血小板治疗中断情况
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 29;63(16):1700-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.12.012. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
10
[Brazilian guidelines on platelet antiaggregants and anticoagulants in cardiology].[巴西心脏病学领域血小板抗聚集剂和抗凝剂指南]
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013 Sep;101(3 Suppl 3):1-95. doi: 10.5935/abc.2013S009.