Eisenberg David M, Kaptchuk Ted J, Post Diana E, Hrbek Andrea L, O'Connor Bonnie B, Osypiuk Kamila, Wayne Peter M, Buring Julie E, Levy Donald B
D.M. Eisenberg is adjunct associate professor, Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. T.J. Kaptchuk is professor of medicine, Harvard Medical School, and director, Program in Placebo Studies & Therapeutic Encounter, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. D.E. Post is assistant professor of medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. A.L. Hrbek is administrator, Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. B.B. O'Connor is professor emerita of clinical pediatrics, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. K. Osypiuk is research assistant, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. P.M. Wayne is assistant professor of medicine, Harvard Medical School, and director of research, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. J.E. Buring is professor of medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Preventive Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. D.B. Levy is medical director, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Acad Med. 2016 Sep;91(9):1223-30. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001173.
Integrative medicine (IM) refers to the combination of conventional and "complementary" medical services (e.g., chiropractic, acupuncture, massage, mindfulness training). More than half of all medical schools in the United States and Canada have programs in IM, and more than 30 academic health centers currently deliver multidisciplinary IM care. What remains unclear, however, is the ideal delivery model (or models) whereby individuals can responsibly access IM care safely, effectively, and reproducibly in a coordinated and cost-effective way.Current models of IM across existing clinical centers vary tremendously in their organizational settings, principal clinical focus, and services provided; practitioner team composition and training; incorporation of research activities and educational programs; and administrative organization (e.g., reporting structure, use of medical records, scope of clinical practice) and financial strategies (i.e., specific business plans and models for sustainability).In this article, the authors address these important strategic issues by sharing lessons learned from the design and implementation of an IM facility within an academic teaching hospital, the Brigham and Women's Hospital at Harvard Medical School; and review alternative options based on information about IM centers across the United States.The authors conclude that there is currently no consensus as to how integrative care models should be optimally organized, implemented, replicated, assessed, and funded. The time may be right for prospective research in "best practices" across emerging models of IM care nationally in an effort to standardize, refine, and replicate them in preparation for rigorous cost-effectiveness evaluations.
整合医学(IM)是指传统医疗服务与“补充性”医疗服务(如整脊疗法、针灸、按摩、正念训练)的结合。美国和加拿大半数以上的医学院校都设有整合医学课程,目前有30多家学术健康中心提供多学科整合医学护理。然而,尚不清楚的是理想的服务模式,即个人能够以协调且具成本效益的方式,安全、有效且可重复地获得整合医学护理。
现有临床中心的整合医学当前模式在组织设置、主要临床重点和提供的服务、从业者团队构成和培训、研究活动和教育项目的纳入情况、行政组织(如报告结构、病历使用、临床实践范围)以及财务策略(即具体的商业计划和可持续发展模式)等方面差异巨大。
在本文中,作者通过分享在哈佛医学院布莱根妇女医院这一学术教学医院内设计和实施一个整合医学机构所获得的经验教训,来探讨这些重要的战略问题;并根据美国各地整合医学中心的信息,审视其他选择方案。作者得出结论,目前对于整合医学护理模式应如何进行最佳组织、实施、推广、评估和筹资尚无共识。开展全国范围内新兴整合医学护理模式“最佳实践”的前瞻性研究,以便对这些模式进行标准化、完善和推广,为严格的成本效益评估做准备,或许时机已到。