Orset Cyrille, Haelewyn Benoit, Allan Stuart M, Ansar Saema, Campos Francesco, Cho Tae Hee, Durand Anne, El Amki Mohamad, Fatar Marc, Garcia-Yébenes Isaac, Gauberti Maxime, Grudzenski Saskia, Lizasoain Ignacio, Lo Eng, Macrez Richard, Margaill Isabelle, Maysami Samaneh, Meairs Stephen, Nighoghossian Norbert, Orbe Josune, Paramo Jose Antonio, Parienti Jean-Jacques, Rothwell Nancy J, Rubio Marina, Waeber Christian, Young Alan R, Touzé Emmanuel, Vivien Denis
Inserm UMR-S U919, University Caen Normandie, GIP Cyceron, Caen, France.
Experimental Stroke Research Platform, CURB, University Caen Normandie, Caen, France.
Stroke. 2016 May;47(5):1312-1318. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.012238. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
The debate over the fact that experimental drugs proposed for the treatment of stroke fail in the translation to the clinical situation has attracted considerable attention in the literature. In this context, we present a retrospective pooled analysis of a large data set from preclinical studies, to examine the effects of early versus late administration of intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator.
We collected data from 26 individual studies from 9 international centers (13 researchers; 716 animals) that compared recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator with controls, in a unique mouse model of thromboembolic stroke induced by an in situ injection of thrombin into the middle cerebral artery. Studies were classified into early (<3 hours) versus late (≥3 hours) drug administration. Final infarct volumes, assessed by histology or magnetic resonance imaging, were compared in each study, and the absolute differences were pooled in a random-effect meta-analysis. The influence of time of administration was tested.
When compared with saline controls, early recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator administration was associated with a significant benefit (absolute difference, -6.63 mm(3); 95% confidence interval, -9.08 to -4.17; I(2)=76%), whereas late recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator treatment showed a deleterious effect (+5.06 mm(3); 95% confidence interval, +2.78 to +7.34; I(2)=42%; Pint<0.00001). Results remained unchanged after subgroup analyses.
Our results provide the basis needed for the design of future preclinical studies on recanalization therapies using this model of thromboembolic stroke in mice. The power analysis reveals that a multicenter trial would require 123 animals per group instead of 40 for a single-center trial.
关于用于治疗中风的实验性药物在转化至临床应用时失败这一事实的争论,在文献中引起了相当大的关注。在此背景下,我们对来自临床前研究的大型数据集进行回顾性汇总分析,以研究静脉注射重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂早期给药与晚期给药的效果。
我们从9个国际中心的26项独立研究(13名研究人员;716只动物)中收集数据,这些研究在一种独特的小鼠血栓栓塞性中风模型中,将重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂与对照组进行比较,该模型通过向大脑中动脉原位注射凝血酶诱导而成。研究分为早期(<3小时)给药组和晚期(≥3小时)给药组。在每项研究中,比较通过组织学或磁共振成像评估的最终梗死体积,并将绝对差异汇总进行随机效应荟萃分析。检验给药时间的影响。
与生理盐水对照组相比,早期给予重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂有显著益处(绝对差异,-6.63立方毫米;95%置信区间,-9.08至-4.17;I² = 76%),而晚期给予重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗显示出有害作用(+5.06立方毫米;95%置信区间,+2.78至+7.34;I² = 42%;Pint<0.00001)。亚组分析后结果保持不变。
我们的结果为使用这种小鼠血栓栓塞性中风模型进行未来再通治疗临床前研究的设计提供了所需依据。功效分析表明,多中心试验每组需要123只动物,而单中心试验每组需要40只。