Schreibeis-Baum Hannah C, Xenakis Lea E, Chen Emily K, Hanson Mark, Ahluwalia Sangeeta, Ryan Gery, Lorenz Karl A
1 Health Services Research and Development, Center for Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles , Los Angeles, California.
2 RAND Health, RAND Corporation , Santa Monica, California.
J Palliat Med. 2016 Apr;19(4):400-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0296.
There is increasing recognition of the role of palliative care (PC) in health care delivery, but priorities for state and federal policy to support PC are unclear and have sometimes engendered controversy. We canvassed experts to shed light on general recommendations for improving PC.
The study objective was to identify challenges to and potential solutions for promoting, adopting, and implementing policies that would support or expand high-quality PC.
Semistructured telephone interviews were used to solicit challenges to and potential solutions for promoting, adopting, and implementing policies that would support or expand high-quality PC. Interviews were analyzed using qualitative methods. The subjects were a purposive sample of 22 professional state and federal-level advocates who work in the field of aging and/or PC.
Respondents identified four central challenges to advancing PC policies: (1) knowledge about PC in the health care setting, (2) cultural beliefs about PC, (3) payment/reimbursement for PC services, and (4) public understanding of PC. Of the wide range of solutions proposed by respondents, we present the eight most frequently discussed solutions to these challenges targeted towards policymakers, health care professionals, research, and the general public. Respondents' understanding of the relationships between problems and solutions revealed many dependencies and interconnectedness.
A qualitative approach of querying experts identified multiple significant challenges to improving and expanding PC, most of which are acknowledged in existing consensus statements. Proposed solutions were more numerous and diffuse than descriptions of the problems, signaling the need for further consensus building around actionable policy, and better understanding of how to advance a PC policy agenda.
姑息治疗(PC)在医疗服务中的作用日益受到认可,但州和联邦层面支持姑息治疗的政策重点尚不明确,有时还引发了争议。我们咨询了专家,以阐明改善姑息治疗的一般性建议。
本研究的目的是确定在促进、采用和实施支持或扩大高质量姑息治疗的政策方面所面临的挑战及潜在解决方案。
采用半结构化电话访谈,征求在促进、采用和实施支持或扩大高质量姑息治疗的政策方面所面临的挑战及潜在解决方案。访谈采用定性方法进行分析。访谈对象是从22名在老龄化和/或姑息治疗领域工作的州和联邦层面专业倡导者中选取的有目的的样本。
受访者确定了推进姑息治疗政策的四个核心挑战:(1)医疗环境中对姑息治疗的了解;(2)对姑息治疗的文化观念;(3)姑息治疗服务的支付/报销;(4)公众对姑息治疗的理解。在受访者提出的众多解决方案中,我们列出了针对政策制定者、医疗保健专业人员、研究人员和普通公众,就这些挑战讨论最频繁的八个解决方案。受访者对问题与解决方案之间关系的理解揭示了许多相互依存和相互关联之处。
通过询问专家的定性方法确定了改善和扩大姑息治疗的多个重大挑战,其中大多数在现有的共识声明中已得到认可。提出的解决方案比问题描述更多且更分散,这表明需要围绕可操作的政策进一步达成共识,并更好地理解如何推进姑息治疗政策议程。