Suppr超能文献

如何进行内镜辅助下的腹壁大切口疝修补术的成分分离技术(ECST)。

How to perform the endoscopically assisted components separation technique (ECST) for large ventral hernia repair.

作者信息

Mommers E H H, Wegdam J A, Nienhuijs S W, de Vries Reilingh T S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Hernia. 2016 Jun;20(3):441-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1485-7. Epub 2016 Apr 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The components separation technique (CST) is frequently used for reconstructing large ventral hernias. Unfortunately, it is associated with a high wound complication rate up to 50 %, caused by large wound surface and inherent trauma to abdominal skin vascularization. An endoscopically assisted modification of the original technique (ECST) spares skin vascularization and reduces wound surface, supposedly reducing wound complications. This study accurately describes ECST step by step with detailed illustrations and report the results of a 27 patient cohort.

METHODS

Since September 2012 patients with midline hernias without previous subcutaneous dissection and a maximum diameter of approximately 10-15 cm underwent ECST in an expert centre for abdominal wall reconstructions. Prospective data was gathered during inpatient care and 3-6 monthly follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (17 male/10 female) with median age of 60 years (range 35-77), average BMI 27 (SD ±2) kg/m(2) and median ASA classification 2 (range 1-3) underwent ECST. Two patients were excluded due to bilateral conversion to conventional CST and finding of peritoneal metastases. Median defect size was 116 ± 48 cm(2). Median length of stay was 5 days (range 3-15). Wound complication rate was 11 %. Recurrence rate was 29 % after a median follow-up of 13 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopically assisted modification of the original technique can be used for reconstructing large and complex ventral hernias up to 15 cm in diameter. The results of this small sized cohort study showed that ECST is feasible in patients with a uro-, or enterostomy and suggest that ECST reduces wound complication rate when compared to CST.

摘要

背景

组织分离技术(CST)常用于修复大型腹侧疝。不幸的是,由于手术创面大以及对腹部皮肤血管化的内在创伤,其伤口并发症发生率高达50%。原始技术的内镜辅助改良术(ECST)可保留皮肤血管化并减小手术创面,据推测可减少伤口并发症。本研究通过详细图示逐步精确描述了ECST,并报告了27例患者队列的结果。

方法

自2012年9月起,在腹壁重建专家中心,对未进行过皮下剥离、最大直径约10 - 15厘米的中线疝患者实施ECST。在住院治疗期间及3 - 6个月的随访中收集前瞻性数据。

结果

27例患者(17例男性/10例女性)接受了ECST,中位年龄60岁(范围35 - 77岁),平均体重指数27(标准差±2)kg/m²,中位美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为2级(范围1 - 3级)。2例患者因双侧转为传统CST及发现腹膜转移而被排除。中位缺损大小为116 ± 48平方厘米。中位住院时间为5天(范围3 - 15天)。伤口并发症发生率为11%。中位随访13个月后复发率为29%。

结论

原始技术的内镜辅助改良术可用于修复直径达15厘米的大型复杂腹侧疝。这项小型队列研究的结果表明,ECST在有尿造口或肠造口的患者中是可行的,并且提示与CST相比,ECST可降低伤口并发症发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验