• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于两项质量保证措施对医疗保险优势计划和独立处方药计划的绩效评估

An Assessment of Performance Between Medicare Advantage and Stand-Alone Prescription Drug Plans on Two Quality Assurance Measures.

作者信息

Blackwell Steven A, Shrank William H, Riley Gerald F

出版信息

J Med Pract Manage. 2016 Jan-Feb;31(4):200-8.

PMID:27039632
Abstract

The purpose of our study was to compare performance between Medicare Advantage and stand-alone prescription drug plans on the two quality assurance measures of drug-disease interaction and drug-drug interaction for elderly heart failure beneficiaries. Performance on the drug-disease interaction measure appeared more problematic for stand-alone plan enrollees compared with Medicare Advantage plan enrollees. No statistical difference existed between the plans regarding drug-drug interactions. It appears there may be considerable room for more sophisticated use of disease profiling in the processing of drug claims. The provision of richer clinical data is an essential step to improving performance on the drug-disease interaction measure.

摘要

我们研究的目的是比较医疗保险优势计划和独立处方药计划在老年心力衰竭受益人的药物-疾病相互作用和药物-药物相互作用这两项质量保证措施方面的表现。与医疗保险优势计划参保者相比,独立计划参保者在药物-疾病相互作用指标上的表现似乎问题更大。在药物-药物相互作用方面,两个计划之间不存在统计学差异。在处理药品理赔时,对疾病特征进行更精细的应用似乎还有很大空间。提供更丰富的临床数据是提高药物-疾病相互作用指标表现的关键一步。

相似文献

1
An Assessment of Performance Between Medicare Advantage and Stand-Alone Prescription Drug Plans on Two Quality Assurance Measures.基于两项质量保证措施对医疗保险优势计划和独立处方药计划的绩效评估
J Med Pract Manage. 2016 Jan-Feb;31(4):200-8.
2
How does drug treatment for diabetes compare between Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans (MAPDs) and stand-alone prescription drug plans (PDPs)?糖尿病药物治疗在医疗保险优势处方药计划(MAPDs)和独立处方药计划(PDPs)之间有何差异?
Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun;48(3):1057-75. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12016. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
3
Rural-Urban Enrollment in Part D Prescription Drug Plans: June 2017 Update.《2017年6月更新:城乡居民参加D部分处方药计划的情况》
Rural Policy Brief. 2017 Dec 1;2017(7):1-6.
4
Socioeconomic characteristics of enrollees appear to influence performance scores for medicare part D contractors.参保人的社会经济特征似乎会影响医疗保险D部分承包商的绩效得分。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jan;33(1):140-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0261.
5
An Assessment of Three Post-Discharge Drug-Based Quality Assurance Events for Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries Enrolled in a Stand-Alone Part D Plan.对参加独立D部分计划的老年医疗保险受益人的三项出院后药物质量保证事件的评估。
J Med Pract Manage. 2016 Sep;32(2):93-97.
6
Management of Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Plans and Medication Adherence: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Analysis.医疗保险D部分处方药计划的管理与药物依从性:概念框架与实证分析
Med Care. 2017 Jan;55(1):37-42. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000591.
7
Predictors of high-risk prescribing among elderly Medicare Advantage beneficiaries.老年医疗保险优势受益人群中高风险处方的预测因素。
Am J Manag Care. 2014 Oct 1;20(10):e469-78.
8
Underreporting high-risk prescribing among Medicare Advantage plans: a cross-sectional analysis.医疗保险优势计划中高风险处方漏报:一项横断面分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Oct 1;159(7):456-62. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-7-201310010-00005.
9
Medicare Advantage and Fee-for-Service Performance on Clinical Quality and Patient Experience Measures: Comparisons from Three Large States.医疗保险优势计划与按服务收费模式在临床质量和患者体验指标方面的表现:来自三个大州的比较
Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec;52(6):2038-2060. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12787.
10
Psychometric evaluation of the Medicare Advantage and prescription drug plan disenrollment reasons survey.医疗保险优势计划和处方药计划退保原因调查的心理计量学评估。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug;54(4):930-939. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13160. Epub 2019 Apr 26.