Anamalayil Shibu J, Teo Boon-Keng K, Lin Alexander, Lustig Robert A, Ahn Peter H
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Br J Radiol. 2016 Jun;89(1062):20160009. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160009. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
While split-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SF-IMRT) decreases dose to low neck (LAN) structures such as the glottic larynx compared with full-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), it is unknown whether SF-IMRT affords superior dose avoidance to organs than whole neck-field volumetric-modulated arc therapy (WF-VMAT).
10 patients treated definitively with radiation for oropharyngeal, oral cavity or nasopharyngeal carcinoma were compared. Only patients ideally suited for SF-IMRT plans were included. The glottic larynx, supraglottic larynx, arytenoids, pharyngeal constrictors, oesophagus, brachial plexus and target volume coverage in the LAN were compared between WF-VMAT and SF-IMRT.
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) yielded statistically significant decreases in maximum dose to the arytenoids and mean dose to the oesophagus. There was no difference in dose to the glottic larynx, supraglottic larynx, pharyngeal constrictors and brachial plexus. WF-VMAT led to improved coverage to 50/2 Gy fraction equivalent in LAN compared with SF-IMRT using an anteroposterior (AP) LAN field but no difference to the 60/2 Gy fraction equivalent between SF-IMRT and WF-VMAT using AP/posterior-anterior LAN boost.
WF-VMAT affords equivalent glottic and supraglottic larynx dose and lower dose to the arytenoids and oesophagus. WF-VMAT better covers most LAN target structures. Given these findings as well as concerns with matchline cold spots or hotspots with SF-IMRT, patients requiring comprehensive elective nodal irradiation should typically be treated with WF-VMAT.
SF-IMRT for larynx sparing has better dosimetric results to normal structures than whole-neck IMRT, but with increased matchline recurrence risk. We show dosimetric equivalence or superiority of WF-VMAT compared with SF-IMRT.
与全颈调强放射治疗(IMRT)相比,分割野调强放射治疗(SF-IMRT)可降低声门喉等下颈部(LAN)结构的剂量,但尚不清楚SF-IMRT在避免器官受量方面是否优于全颈野容积调强弧形放疗(WF-VMAT)。
比较10例接受口咽、口腔或鼻咽癌根治性放疗的患者。仅纳入最适合SF-IMRT计划的患者。比较WF-VMAT和SF-IMRT在声门喉、声门上喉、杓状软骨、咽缩肌、食管、臂丛神经以及LAN中靶区覆盖情况。
容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)使杓状软骨的最大剂量和食管的平均剂量有统计学意义的降低。声门喉、声门上喉、咽缩肌和臂丛神经的剂量无差异。与使用前后位(AP)LAN野的SF-IMRT相比, WF-VMAT使LAN中50/2 Gy等效分次剂量的靶区覆盖得到改善,但与使用AP/后前位LAN加量的SF-IMRT相比,60/2 Gy等效分次剂量时无差异。
WF-VMAT给予声门和声门上喉同等剂量,而杓状软骨和食管的剂量更低。WF-VMAT能更好地覆盖大多数LAN靶区结构。鉴于这些发现以及对SF-IMRT匹配线冷点或热点的担忧,需要进行全面选择性淋巴结照射的患者通常应采用WF-VMAT治疗。
用于保留喉功能的SF-IMRT对正常结构的剂量学结果优于全颈IMRT,但匹配线复发风险增加。我们显示WF-VMAT与SF-IMRT相比在剂量学上等效或更优。