Katolikova Marina, Khaitov Vadim, Väinölä Risto, Gantsevich Michael, Strelkov Petr
Department of Ichthyology and Hydrobiology, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 4;11(4):e0152963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152963. eCollection 2016.
Two blue mussel lineages of Pliocene origin, Mytilus edulis (ME) and M. trossulus (MT), co-occur and hybridize in several regions on the shores of the North Atlantic. The two species were distinguished from each other by molecular methods in the 1980s, and a large amount of comparative data on them has been accumulated since that time. However, while ME and MT are now routinely distinguished by various genetic markers, they tend to be overlooked in ecological studies since morphological characters for taxonomic identification have been lacking, and no consistent habitat differences between lineages have been reported. Surveying a recently discovered area of ME and MT co-occurrence in the White Sea and employing a set of allozyme markers for identification, we address the issue whether ME and MT are true biological species with distinct ecological characteristics or just virtual genetic entities with no matching morphological and ecological identities. We find that: (1) in the White Sea, the occurrence of MT is largely concentrated in harbors, in line with observations from other subarctic regions of Europe; (2) mixed populations of ME and MT are always dominated by purebred individuals, animals classified as hybrids constituting only ca. 18%; (3) in terms of shell morphology, 80% of MT bear a distinct uninterrupted dark prismatic strip under the ligament while 97% of ME lack this character; (4) at sites of sympatry MT is more common on algal substrates while ME mostly lives directly on the bottom. This segregation by the substrate may contribute to maintaining reproductive isolation and decreasing competition between taxa. We conclude that while ME and MT are not fully reproductively isolated, they do represent clearly distinguishable biological, ecological and morphological entities in the White Sea. It remains to be documented whether the observed morphological and ecological differences are of a local character, or whether they have simply been overlooked in other contact zones.
两个上新世起源的蓝贻贝谱系,即紫贻贝(ME)和翡翠贻贝(MT),在北大西洋沿岸的几个地区共同出现并杂交。这两个物种在20世纪80年代通过分子方法得以区分,自那时起积累了大量关于它们的比较数据。然而,尽管现在ME和MT通常通过各种遗传标记来区分,但在生态研究中它们往往被忽视,因为缺乏用于分类鉴定的形态特征,且尚未报道谱系之间存在一致的栖息地差异。通过调查白海地区最近发现的ME和MT共存区域,并使用一组等位酶标记进行鉴定,我们探讨了ME和MT是具有独特生态特征的真正生物物种,还是仅仅是没有匹配形态和生态特征的虚拟遗传实体这一问题。我们发现:(1)在白海,MT的出现主要集中在港口,这与欧洲其他亚北极地区的观察结果一致;(2)ME和MT的混合种群总是以纯种个体为主,被归类为杂交种的动物仅占约18%;(3)就壳形态而言,80%的MT在韧带下方有一条明显的不间断深色棱柱形条纹,而97%的ME没有这一特征;(4)在同域分布的地点,MT在藻类基质上更常见,而ME大多直接生活在底部。这种基于基质的隔离可能有助于维持生殖隔离并减少分类群之间的竞争。我们得出结论,虽然ME和MT没有完全生殖隔离,但它们在白海确实代表了明显可区分的生物、生态和形态实体。观察到的形态和生态差异是局部特征,还是仅仅在其他接触区域被忽视,仍有待记录。