Peterson Teresa E, Kirkpatrick Nathaniel D, Huang Yuhui, Farrar Christian T, Marijt Koen A, Kloepper Jonas, Datta Meenal, Amoozgar Zohreh, Seano Giorgio, Jung Keehoon, Kamoun Walid S, Vardam Trupti, Snuderl Matija, Goveia Jermaine, Chatterjee Sampurna, Batista Ana, Muzikansky Alona, Leow Ching Ching, Xu Lei, Batchelor Tracy T, Duda Dan G, Fukumura Dai, Jain Rakesh K
Edwin L. Steele Laboratories, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114; Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115;
Edwin L. Steele Laboratories, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114;
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 19;113(16):4470-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1525349113. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
Glioblastomas (GBMs) rapidly become refractory to anti-VEGF therapies. We previously demonstrated that ectopic overexpression of angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) compromises the benefits of anti-VEGF receptor (VEGFR) treatment in murine GBM models and that circulating Ang-2 levels in GBM patients rebound after an initial decrease following cediranib (a pan-VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor) administration. Here we tested whether dual inhibition of VEGFR/Ang-2 could improve survival in two orthotopic models of GBM, Gl261 and U87. Dual therapy using cediranib and MEDI3617 (an anti-Ang-2-neutralizing antibody) improved survival over each therapy alone by delaying Gl261 growth and increasing U87 necrosis, effectively reducing viable tumor burden. Consistent with their vascular-modulating function, the dual therapies enhanced morphological normalization of vessels. Dual therapy also led to changes in tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). Inhibition of TAM recruitment using an anti-colony-stimulating factor-1 antibody compromised the survival benefit of dual therapy. Thus, dual inhibition of VEGFR/Ang-2 prolongs survival in preclinical GBM models by reducing tumor burden, improving normalization, and altering TAMs. This approach may represent a potential therapeutic strategy to overcome the limitations of anti-VEGFR monotherapy in GBM patients by integrating the complementary effects of anti-Ang2 treatment on vessels and immune cells.
胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)会迅速对抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)疗法产生耐药性。我们之前证明,在小鼠胶质母细胞瘤模型中,血管生成素-2(Ang-2)的异位过表达会削弱抗血管内皮生长因子受体(VEGFR)治疗的效果,并且胶质母细胞瘤患者的循环Ang-2水平在给予西地尼布(一种泛VEGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂)后最初下降,但之后会反弹。在此,我们测试了VEGFR/Ang-2双重抑制是否能提高两种原位胶质母细胞瘤模型(Gl261和U87)的生存率。使用西地尼布和MEDI3617(一种抗Ang-2中和抗体)的双重疗法通过延缓Gl261生长和增加U87坏死,有效降低了存活肿瘤负荷,从而比单独使用每种疗法都提高了生存率。与它们的血管调节功能一致,双重疗法增强了血管的形态正常化。双重疗法还导致肿瘤相关巨噬细胞(TAM)发生变化。使用抗集落刺激因子-1抗体抑制TAM募集会损害双重疗法的生存益处。因此,VEGFR/Ang-2双重抑制通过降低肿瘤负荷、改善正常化和改变TAM,延长了临床前胶质母细胞瘤模型的生存期。这种方法可能代表了一种潜在的治疗策略,通过整合抗Ang-2治疗对血管和免疫细胞的互补作用,克服GBM患者抗VEGFR单药治疗的局限性。