White W L, Glover A T, Buckner A B, Hartshorne M F
Ophthalmology Service, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234-6200.
Ophthalmology. 1989 Feb;96(2):167-9. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32918-6.
Studies evaluating the relative importance of the upper and lower canaliculi in tear drainage have been many and varied, and at times the application of the data to clinical situations is difficult. In order to evaluate the relative tear flow in the upper and lower canaliculi and to quantitatively evaluate the different tear flow rates by a physiologic method, we have studied 11 patients using partial canalicular obstructions and dacryoscintigraphy. The authors found no statistical difference in tear flow between the upper and lower canalicular systems. This information has clinical application when deciding whether to repair an isolated canalicular injury.
评估上下泪小管在泪液引流中相对重要性的研究众多且各不相同,有时将这些数据应用于临床情况颇具难度。为了评估上下泪小管中的相对泪液流量,并通过生理学方法定量评估不同的泪液流速,我们对11例患者采用部分泪小管阻塞和泪道闪烁造影术进行了研究。作者发现上下泪小管系统之间的泪液流量无统计学差异。这一信息在决定是否修复孤立性泪小管损伤时具有临床应用价值。