Ogut M S, Bavbek T, Kazokoglu H
Department of Ophthalmology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1993 Feb;71(1):69-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1993.tb04963.x.
Controversy exists about the role of upper and lower canaliculi in tear drainage. Fluorescein dye disappearance test was used to evaluate tear drainage after experimental obstruction of upper, lower, neither or both canaliculi in 18 subjects by hydroxypropil cellulose rods. When both canaliculi were occluded marked impairment was noted in all subjects (p < 0.05). Monocanalicular obstruction (either upper or lower) generally resulted in minimal impairment in most of the cases. Only 11% of upper canalicular obstruction and 20% of lower canalicular obstruction resulted in marked impairment. There was no significant difference between upper and lower canalicular obstruction (p < 0.05). In this study it is concluded that both upper and lower canaliculus have equal importance in tear drainage.
关于上下泪小管在泪液引流中的作用存在争议。通过羟丙基纤维素棒对18名受试者的上泪小管、下泪小管、双侧泪小管均不阻塞或双侧泪小管均阻塞进行实验性阻塞后,使用荧光素染料消失试验来评估泪液引流情况。当双侧泪小管均被阻塞时,所有受试者均出现明显的引流障碍(p < 0.05)。在大多数情况下,单泪小管阻塞(上泪小管或下泪小管)通常导致最小程度的引流障碍。仅11%的上泪小管阻塞和20%的下泪小管阻塞导致明显的引流障碍。上泪小管阻塞和下泪小管阻塞之间无显著差异(p < 0.05)。本研究得出结论,上泪小管和下泪小管在泪液引流中具有同等重要性。