Suppr超能文献

有症状的隐形眼镜佩戴者对冷刺激的超敏反应

Hypersensitivity to Cold Stimuli in Symptomatic Contact Lens Wearers.

作者信息

Situ Ping, Simpson Trefford, Begley Carolyn

机构信息

*PhD, MSc, BMed †PhD ‡OD, MS, FAAO School of Optometry (PS, CB), Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana; and School of Optometry and Vision Science (TS), University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Aug;93(8):909-16. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000857.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine the cooling thresholds and the estimated sensation magnitude at stimulus detection in controls and symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens (CL) wearers, to determine whether detection thresholds depend on the presence of symptoms of dryness and discomfort.

METHODS

Forty-nine adapted CL wearers and 15 non-lens wearing controls had room temperature pneumatic thresholds measured using a custom Belmonte esthesiometer, during Visits 1 and 2 (Baseline CL), Visit 3 (2 weeks no CL wear), and Visit 4 (2 weeks after resuming CL wear). CL wearers were subdivided into symptomatic and asymptomatic groups based on comfortable wearing time (CWT) and CLDEQ-8 score (<8 hours CWT and ≥14 CLDEQ-8 stratified the symptom groups). Detection thresholds were estimated using an ascending method of limits and each threshold was the average of the three first-reported flow rates. The magnitude of intensity, coolness, irritation, and pain at detection of the stimulus were estimated using a 1-100 scale (1 very mild, 100 very strong).

RESULTS

In all measurement conditions, the symptomatic CL wearers were the most sensitive, the asymptomatic CL wearers were the least sensitive, and the control group was between the two CL wearing groups (group factor p < 0.001, post hoc asymptomatic vs. symptomatic group, all p's < 0.015). Similar patterns were found for the estimated magnitude of intensity and irritation (group effect p = 0.027 and 0.006 for intensity and irritation, respectively) but not for cooling (p > 0.05) at detection threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic CL wearers have higher cold detection sensitivity and report greater intensity and irritation sensation at stimulus detection than the asymptomatic wearers. Room temperature pneumatic esthesiometry may help to better understand the process of sensory adaptation to CL wear.

摘要

目的

研究对照组、有症状和无症状隐形眼镜(CL)佩戴者在刺激检测时的冷觉阈值和估计的感觉强度,以确定检测阈值是否取决于干眼和不适症状的存在。

方法

49名适应隐形眼镜佩戴者和15名非隐形眼镜佩戴者在第1次和第2次就诊(基线隐形眼镜佩戴)、第3次就诊(停戴隐形眼镜2周)和第4次就诊(重新佩戴隐形眼镜2周)期间,使用定制的贝尔蒙特触觉计测量室温下的气动阈值。根据舒适佩戴时间(CWT)和CLDEQ - 8评分(CWT < 8小时且CLDEQ - 8≥14对症状组进行分层),将隐形眼镜佩戴者分为有症状组和无症状组。使用极限递增法估计检测阈值,每个阈值是首次报告的三个流速的平均值。使用1 - 100量表(1为非常轻微,100为非常强烈)估计刺激检测时的强度、凉爽度、刺激感和疼痛感的大小。

结果

在所有测量条件下,有症状的隐形眼镜佩戴者最敏感,无症状的隐形眼镜佩戴者最不敏感,对照组介于两组隐形眼镜佩戴者之间(组因素p < 0.001,事后检验无症状组与有症状组比较,所有p值 < 0.015)。在检测阈值时,强度和刺激感的估计大小也发现了类似模式(强度和刺激感的组效应p分别为0.027和0.006),但凉爽度方面无此模式(p > 0.05)。

结论

有症状的隐形眼镜佩戴者比无症状的佩戴者具有更高的冷觉检测敏感性,并且在刺激检测时报告更大的强度和刺激感。室温下的气动感觉测量法可能有助于更好地理解对隐形眼镜佩戴的感觉适应过程。

相似文献

2
Measurement of difference thresholds on the ocular surface.眼表面差异阈的测量。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Feb 24;55(2):1095-100. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12874.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验