Patel Nakul Gamanlal, Rozen Warren Matthew, Chow Whitney T H, Chowdhry Muhammad, Fitzgerald O'Connor Edmund, Sharma Hrsikesa, Griffiths Matthew, Ramakrishnan Venkat V
St Andrew's Centre for Plastic Surgery and Burns, Broomfield Hospital, Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust, Chelmsford, Essex CM1 7ET, UK.
Gland Surg. 2016 Apr;5(2):115-21. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2016.02.03.
Stacked and bipedicled abdominal flaps are useful in women who require a large breast reconstruction but have relative paucity of abdominal tissue. A new classification system is described to assist the surgeon in achieving the best possible aesthetic outcome.
A retrospective review of 25 consecutive stacked and/or bipedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstructions was assessed from 2009 to 2014. Demographic data and key variables were prospectively collected in our breast reconstruction database and an aesthetic classification devised. There are four main subtypes, (I) folded; (II) divided; (III) coned; and (IV) divided and folded. Each of these subtypes can be moulded in a symmetrically or asymmetrically fashion depending on the contralateral breast shape together with distribution and consistency of fat within the abdominal flap.
Of the 25 patients, three-quarter were immediate reconstruction, with an average age of 48 years and a median follow-up of 2 years 10 months. Just over half the patients (57%) had bipedicle flaps with two recipient donor vessels with the remaining 43% had stacked flaps. The most common recipient sites are the thoracodorsal vessels (62%) and intercostal perforators (26%). The average abdominal pannus weight was 610 grams (SD: 320 grams), with a hemi-abdominal weight of 305 grams. Two patients had haematomas, of which one lost their reconstruction. Another patient had a venous congestion flap which was salvaged.
Bipedicled or stacked abdominal flaps allow the all four zones of the abdominal tissue to be used in unilateral breast reconstruction. The approach of tailoring the abdominal flaps to match the contralateral breast reconstruction is largely an art form. The paper aims to bring some meaningful system to aid the surgeon to achieve the best possible outcome with the components presented to them.
对于那些需要进行大型乳房重建但腹部组织相对较少的女性,堆叠式和双蒂腹部皮瓣很有用。本文描述了一种新的分类系统,以帮助外科医生获得尽可能最佳的美学效果。
对2009年至2014年连续进行的25例堆叠式和/或双蒂腹壁下深动脉穿支(DIEP)皮瓣重建手术进行回顾性评估。在我们的乳房重建数据库中前瞻性收集人口统计学数据和关键变量,并设计了一种美学分类。主要有四种亚型,(I)折叠型;(II)分割型;(III)圆锥型;以及(IV)分割并折叠型。根据对侧乳房形状以及腹部皮瓣内脂肪的分布和质地,这些亚型中的每一种都可以以对称或不对称的方式塑形。
25例患者中,四分之三为即刻重建,平均年龄48岁,中位随访时间为2年10个月。略超过一半的患者(57%)采用双蒂皮瓣,有两条受区供血血管,其余43%采用堆叠皮瓣。最常见的受区部位是胸背血管(62%)和肋间穿支(26%)。平均腹部赘肉重量为610克(标准差:320克),半腹重量为305克。2例患者出现血肿,其中1例乳房重建失败。另1例患者皮瓣出现静脉淤血,但成功挽救。
双蒂或堆叠式腹部皮瓣可使腹部组织的所有四个区域用于单侧乳房重建。根据对侧乳房重建情况定制腹部皮瓣的方法在很大程度上是一种艺术形式。本文旨在引入一些有意义的系统,以帮助外科医生利用所提供的组件获得尽可能最佳的效果。