• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Researching Complex Interventions in Health: The State of the Art : Exeter, UK. 14-15 October 2015.健康领域复杂干预措施研究:最新进展:英国埃克塞特。2015年10月14 - 15日。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 4;16 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1274-0.
2
Erratum to: Researching Complex Interventions in Health: The State of the Art.《健康领域复杂干预措施研究:现状》勘误
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 May 13;16(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1416-4.
3
Cemented collarless (Exeter-CPT) versus cementless collarless (PCA) femoral components. A 2- to 14-year follow-up evaluation.骨水泥无领(埃克塞特定制柄型)与非骨水泥无领(PCA)股骨假体。2至14年的随访评估。
J Arthroplasty. 1995 Oct;10(5):592-7. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(05)80201-3.
4
Mitosis - The story : Conly Rieder of the Wadsworth Center, Albany, NY, interviewed at the University of Exeter, UK, by James Wakefield and Herbert Macgregor, October 2010.有丝分裂的故事:纽约州奥尔巴尼市沃兹沃思中心的康利·里德于2010年10月在英国埃克塞特大学接受詹姆斯·韦克菲尔德和赫伯特·麦格雷戈的采访。
Chromosome Res. 2011 Apr;19(3):275-90. doi: 10.1007/s10577-010-9174-3.
5
Exeter Universal cemented femoral component.埃克塞特通用粘结型股骨假体
Bone Joint J. 2020 Oct;102-B(10):1319-1323. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B10.BJJ-2019-1454.R1.
6
Risk of fracture after primary total hip arthroplasty using a collared cementless stem or a polished taper-slip cemented stem.使用带颈无骨水泥柄或抛光锥形滑移骨水泥柄进行初次全髋关节置换术后的骨折风险。
Bone Joint J. 2025 May 1;107-B(5 Supple A):82-86. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.107B5.BJJ-2024-1113.R1.
7
How do cemented short Exeter stems perform compared with standard-length Exeter stems? The experience of the New Zealand National Joint Registry.与标准长度的埃克塞特柄相比,骨水泥型短埃克塞特柄的表现如何?新西兰国家关节注册中心的经验。
Arthroplast Today. 2020 Mar 3;6(1):104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.01.003. eCollection 2020 Mar.
8
What is the Role of Stem Size and Offset in the Risk of Nonseptic Revision of the Exeter® 150-mm Stem? A Study From the Swedish Arthroplasty Register.柄尺寸和偏心距在 Exeter®150mm 柄非感染性翻修风险中的作用是什么?来自瑞典关节置换登记处的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Sep 1;481(9):1689-1699. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002670. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
9
The utility of cemented femoral stems in modern THA: a 10-year comparative analysis of the Charnley and Exeter stems.骨水泥型股骨柄在现代全髋关节置换术中的应用:Charnley 和 Exeter 柄的 10 年对比分析。
Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Feb;193(1):251-255. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03381-y. Epub 2023 May 27.
10
Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs.在多氏A型股骨中,与骨水泥型埃克塞特标准柄相比,骨水泥型埃克塞特短柄早期下沉较少。
Bone Jt Open. 2023 Jul 6;4(7):507-515. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.47.BJO-2023-0008.R1.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of integrating paediatric tuberculosis services into child healthcare services on case detection in Africa: the INPUT stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial.将儿科结核病服务纳入儿童保健服务对非洲病例发现的影响:INPUT阶梯式楔形整群随机试验
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Dec 18;9(12):e016429. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016429.
2
Physiotherapists' and midwives' views of increased inter recti abdominis distance and its management in women after childbirth.物理治疗师和助产士对产后女性腹直肌间距增加及其处理的看法。
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Feb 27;20(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-00907-9.
3
Arts, mental distress, mental health functioning & life satisfaction: fixed-effects analyses of a nationally-representative panel study.艺术、精神困扰、心理健康功能和生活满意度:一项全国代表性面板研究的固定效应分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 11;20(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8109-y.
4
Barriers and Facilitators of Conducting Medication Reviews in Nursing Home Residents: A Qualitative Study.养老院居民用药评估的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Sep 18;10:1026. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01026. eCollection 2019.
5
What is required to facilitate implementation of Swedish physical activity on prescription? - interview study with primary healthcare staff and management.促进瑞典体育活动处方实施需要什么?——对基层医疗保健人员和管理人员的访谈研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 21;18(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3021-1.
6
Health-care users, key community informants and primary health care workers' views on health, health promotion, health assets and deficits: qualitative study in seven Spanish regions.卫生保健使用者、主要社区知情者和初级卫生保健工作者对健康、健康促进、健康资产和缺陷的看法:在西班牙七个地区的定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jun 13;16(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0590-2.
7
Erratum to: Researching Complex Interventions in Health: The State of the Art.《健康领域复杂干预措施研究:现状》勘误
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 May 13;16(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1416-4.

健康领域复杂干预措施研究:最新进展:英国埃克塞特。2015年10月14 - 15日。

Researching Complex Interventions in Health: The State of the Art : Exeter, UK. 14-15 October 2015.

作者信息

Craig Peter, Rahm-Hallberg Ingalill, Britten Nicky, Borglin Gunilla, Meyer Gabriele, Köpke Sascha, Noyes Jane, Chandler Jackie, Levati Sara, Sales Anne, Thabane Lehana, Giangregorio Lora, Feeley Nancy, Cossette Sylvie, Taylor Rod, Hill Jacqueline, Richards David A., Kuyken Willem, von Essen Louise, Williams Andrew, Hemming Karla, Lilford Richard, Girling Alan, Taljaard Monica, Dimairo Munyaradzi, Petticrew Mark, Baird Janis, Moore Graham, Odendaal Willem, Atkins Salla, Lutge Elizabeth, Leon Natalie, Lewin Simon, Payne Katherine, van Achterberg Theo, Sermeus Walter, Pitt Martin, Monks Thomas

机构信息

MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit (SPHSU), University of Glasgow, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3QB UK

Lund University, PO Box 117, 221 00 Lund, Sweden

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 4;16 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1274-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-016-1274-0
PMID:27050396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4894677/
Abstract

KEYNOTE PRESENTATIONS K1 Researching complex interventions: the need for robust approaches Peter Craig K2 Complex intervention studies: an important step in developing knowledge for practice Ingalill Rahm-Hallberg K3 Public and patient involvement in research: what, why and how? Nicky Britten K4 Mixed methods in health service research – where do we go from here? Gunilla Borglin SPEAKER PRESENTATIONS S1 Exploring complexity in systematic reviews of complex interventions Gabriele Meyer, Sascha Köpke, Jane Noyes, Jackie Chandler S2 Can complex health interventions be optimised before moving to a definitive RCT? Strategies and methods currently in use Sara Levati S3 A systematic approach to develop theory based implementation interventions Anne Sales S4 Pilot studies and feasibility studies for complex interventions: an introduction Lehana Thabane, Lora Giangregorio S5 What can be done to pilot complex interventions? Nancy Feeley, Sylvie Cossette S6 Using feasibility and pilot trials to test alternative methodologies and methodological procedures prior to full scale trials Rod Taylor S7 A mixed methods feasibility study in practice Jacqueline Hill, David A Richards, Willem Kuyken S8 Non-standard experimental designs and preference designs Louise von Essen S9 Evaluation gone wild: using natural experimental approaches to evaluate complex interventions Andrew Williams S10 The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: an opportunity to increase the quality of evaluations of service delivery and public policy interventions Karla Hemming, Richard Lilford, Alan Girling, Monica Taljaard S11 Adaptive designs in confirmatory clinical trials: opportunities in investigating complex interventions Munyaradzi Dimairo S12 Processes, contexts and outcomes in complex interventions, and the implications for evaluation Mark Petticrew S13 Processes, contexts and outcomes in complex interventions, and the implications for evaluation Janis Baird, Graham Moore S14 Qualitative evaluation alongside RCTs: what to consider to get relevant and valuable results Willem Odendaal, Salla Atkins, Elizabeth Lutge, Natalie Leon, Simon Lewin S15 Using economic evaluations to understand the value of complex interventions: when maximising health status is not sufficient Katherine Payne S16 How to arrive at an implementation plan Theo van Achterberg S17 Modelling process and outcomes in complex interventions Walter Sermeus S18 Systems modelling for improving health care Martin Pitt, Thomas Monks

摘要

主旨演讲

K1 研究复杂干预措施:需要稳健的方法 彼得·克雷格

K2 复杂干预研究:实践知识发展中的重要一步 英加利尔·拉姆 - 哈尔伯格

K3 公众和患者参与研究:是什么、为什么以及如何参与?尼基·布里顿

K4 卫生服务研究中的混合方法——我们从这里走向何方?古尼拉·博格林

演讲者发言

S1 在复杂干预的系统评价中探索复杂性 加布里埃莱·迈耶、萨沙·科普克、简·诺伊斯、杰基·钱德勒

S2 在开展确定性随机对照试验之前,复杂卫生干预措施能否得到优化?当前使用的策略和方法 萨拉·莱瓦蒂

S3 开发基于理论的实施干预措施的系统方法 安妮·塞尔斯

S4 复杂干预措施的预试验和可行性研究:介绍 莱哈娜·萨巴内、洛拉·詹格雷戈里奥

S5 如何对复杂干预措施进行预试验?南希·费利、西尔维·科塞特

S6 在全面试验之前,利用可行性和预试验来测试替代方法和方法程序 罗德·泰勒

S7 实践中的混合方法可行性研究 杰奎琳·希尔、大卫·A·理查兹、威廉·库伊肯

S8 非标准实验设计和偏好设计 路易丝·冯·埃森

S9 疯狂的评估:使用自然实验方法评估复杂干预措施 安德鲁·威廉姆斯

S10 阶梯楔形整群随机试验:提高服务提供和公共政策干预评估质量的契机 卡拉·亨明、理查德·利尔福德、艾伦·吉林、莫妮卡·塔尔贾德

S11 确证性临床试验中的适应性设计:研究复杂干预措施的机遇 穆尼亚拉德齐·迪马伊罗

S12 复杂干预措施中的过程、背景和结果及其对评估的影响 马克·佩蒂克鲁

S13 复杂干预措施中的过程、背景和结果及其对评估的影响 贾尼斯·贝尔德、格雷厄姆·摩尔

S14 随机对照试验中的定性评估:为获得相关且有价值的结果应考虑什么 威廉·奥登达尔、萨拉·阿特金斯、伊丽莎白·卢特格、娜塔莉·利昂、西蒙·莱温

S15 利用经济评估理解复杂干预措施的价值:仅最大化健康状况是不够的 凯瑟琳·佩恩

S16 如何制定实施计划 西奥·范·阿赫特贝格

S17 复杂干预措施中的过程和结果建模 沃尔特·瑟默斯

S18 用于改善医疗保健的系统建模 马丁·皮特、托马斯·蒙克斯