• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Health-care users, key community informants and primary health care workers' views on health, health promotion, health assets and deficits: qualitative study in seven Spanish regions.卫生保健使用者、主要社区知情者和初级卫生保健工作者对健康、健康促进、健康资产和缺陷的看法:在西班牙七个地区的定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jun 13;16(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0590-2.
2
Beyond the consultation room: Proposals to approach health promotion in primary care according to health-care users, key community informants and primary care centre workers.超越问诊室:根据医疗保健使用者、关键社区线人以及基层医疗中心工作人员的建议来开展初级保健中的健康促进工作。
Health Expect. 2017 Oct;20(5):896-910. doi: 10.1111/hex.12530. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
3
Qualitative evaluation of a complex intervention to implement health promotion activities according to healthcare attendees and health professionals: EIRA study (phase II).根据医疗服务接受者和卫生专业人员对实施健康促进活动的复杂干预措施进行定性评估:EIRA 研究(第二阶段)。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 23;9(3):e023872. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023872.
4
Health assets for adolescents: opinions from a neighbourhood in Spain.青少年的健康资产:来自西班牙一个社区的观点。
Health Promot Int. 2015 Sep;30(3):552-62. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dat081. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
5
Local professionals' perceptions of health assets in a low-SES Dutch neighbourhood: a qualitative study.荷兰一个低社会经济地位社区中当地专业人士对健康资产的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jul 12;18(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4555-6.
6
Community health workers in Lesotho: Experiences of health promotion activities.莱索托的社区卫生工作者:健康促进活动的经验
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2018 Feb 27;10(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v10i1.1558.
7
User participation in community mental health services: exploring the experiences of users and professionals.用户参与社区心理健康服务:探索用户与专业人员的体验
Scand J Caring Sci. 2009 Dec;23(4):674-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00660.x. Epub 2009 Oct 4.
8
The implementation of health promotion in primary and community care: a qualitative analysis of the 'Prescribe Vida Saludable' strategy.在初级和社区护理中实施健康促进:对“开出处方,健康生活”策略的定性分析
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Feb 17;18(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0584-6.
9
Perceptions of community-based field workers on the effect of a longitudinal biomedical research project on their sustainable livelihoods.社区实地工作者对一项纵向生物医学研究项目对其可持续生计影响的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Mar 17;17(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4138-6.
10
"Workhood"-a useful concept for the analysis of health workers' resources? An evaluation from Tanzania.工作身份-分析卫生工作者资源的有用概念?来自坦桑尼亚的评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Mar 8;12:55. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-55.

引用本文的文献

1
Professional Perspectives on Children's Health Assets: A Delphi Study.儿童健康资产的专业观点:一项德尔菲研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 20;12(5):506. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12050506.
2
Effectiveness of a multiple health-behaviour-change intervention in increasing adherence to the Mediterranean Diet in adults (EIRA study): a randomized controlled hybrid trial.多健康行为改变干预措施对增加成年人遵循地中海饮食的效果(EIRA 研究):一项随机对照混合试验。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 19;22(1):2127. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14590-y.
3
"This Group is Like a Home to Me:" understandings of health of LGBTQ refugees in a Swedish health-related integration intervention: a qualitative study.“这个团体对我来说就像家一样”:对参与瑞典与健康相关的融入干预的 LGBTQ 难民健康状况的理解:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;22(1):1246. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13641-8.
4
Multiple health behaviour change primary care intervention for smoking cessation, physical activity and healthy diet in adults 45 to 75 years old (EIRA study): a hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster randomised trial.多健康行为改变初级保健干预措施在 45 至 75 岁成年人中的戒烟、身体活动和健康饮食(EIRA 研究):一项混合有效性-实施的群组随机试验。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 4;21(1):2208. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11982-4.
5
Implementation of the EIRA 3 Intervention by Targeting Primary Health Care Practitioners: Effectiveness in Increasing Physical Activity.通过针对初级保健从业者实施 EIRA 3 干预措施来提高身体活动水平的效果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 8;18(19):10537. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910537.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a multiple health behaviour change intervention in people aged between 45 and 75 years: a cluster randomized controlled trial in primary care (EIRA study).45 至 75 岁人群多种健康行为改变干预措施的成本效益分析:初级保健中的群组随机对照试验(EIRA 研究)。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jul 2;18(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01144-5.
7
Right by your side? - the relational scope of health and wellbeing as congruence, complement and coincidence.在你身边?——健康和幸福的关系范畴是一致、互补和契合。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec;16(1):1927482. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2021.1927482.
8
Dimensions of Community Assets for Health. A Systematised Review and Meta-Synthesis.促进健康的社区资产维度。一项系统评价与元综合分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 27;18(11):5758. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115758.
9
Effectiveness of a Multicomponent Intervention in Primary Care That Addresses Patients with Diabetes Mellitus with Two or More Unhealthy Habits, Such as Diet, Physical Activity or Smoking: Multicenter Randomized Cluster Trial (EIRA Study).多组分干预措施在初级保健中的有效性,针对患有两种或多种不健康习惯(如饮食、身体活动或吸烟)的糖尿病患者:多中心随机群组试验(EIRA 研究)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 28;18(11):5788. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115788.
10
Perception of the primary health care response capacity by patients with and without mental health problems, and health professionals: qualitative study.有心理健康问题和无心理健康问题的患者以及卫生专业人员对初级卫生保健应对能力的认知:定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 31;21(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06205-w.

本文引用的文献

1
[Five paradoxes in health promotion].[健康促进中的五个悖论]
Gac Sanit. 2017 May-Jun;31(3):269-272. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.10.011. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
2
[Health promotion based on assets: how to work with this perspective in local interventions?].[基于资产的健康促进:如何在地方干预中运用这一视角?]
Gac Sanit. 2016 Nov;30 Suppl 1:93-98. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.06.004.
3
Researching Complex Interventions in Health: The State of the Art : Exeter, UK. 14-15 October 2015.健康领域复杂干预措施研究:最新进展:英国埃克塞特。2015年10月14 - 15日。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 4;16 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1274-0.
4
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power.定性访谈研究中的样本量:以信息力为导向
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
5
Getting past the dual logic: findings from a pilot asset mapping exercise in Sheffield, UK.突破二元逻辑:英国谢菲尔德一项试点资产映射活动的结果
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Jan;25(1):105-113. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12274. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
6
Primary care patients' perspectives of barriers and enablers of primary prevention and health promotion-a meta-ethnographic synthesis.初级保健患者对初级预防和健康促进的障碍与促进因素的看法——一项元民族志综合研究
PLoS One. 2015 May 4;10(5):e0125004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125004. eCollection 2015.
7
Improving the evidence base on public health assets--the way ahead: a proposed research agenda.完善公共卫生资产的证据基础——前进之路:一项拟议的研究议程。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Aug;69(8):721-3. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-205096. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
8
Building interventions in primary health care for long-term effectiveness in health promotion and disease prevention. A focus on complex and multi-risk interventions.构建初级卫生保健干预措施,以实现健康促进和疾病预防的长期效果。关注复杂的多风险干预措施。
Prev Med. 2015 Jul;76 Suppl:S1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
9
An exploration of beliefs and attitudes regarding healthy lifestyle behaviour in an urban population in The Netherlands: Results from a focus group study in a community-based prevention project.荷兰城市人口对健康生活方式行为的信念和态度探索:基于社区预防项目的焦点小组研究结果
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Jun;25(3):467-71. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku140. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
10
[What are we doing in neighborhoods? Description of health-promoting community activities in primary care: the FrAC Project].[我们在社区中做什么?初级保健中促进健康的社区活动描述:FrAC项目]
Gac Sanit. 2014 Jul-Aug;28(4):267-73. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Mar 7.

卫生保健使用者、主要社区知情者和初级卫生保健工作者对健康、健康促进、健康资产和缺陷的看法:在西班牙七个地区的定性研究。

Health-care users, key community informants and primary health care workers' views on health, health promotion, health assets and deficits: qualitative study in seven Spanish regions.

机构信息

Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Av. Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 587, àtic, 08007, Barcelona, Spain.

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jun 13;16(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0590-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12939-017-0590-2
PMID:28610633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5470288/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although some articles have analysed the definitions of health and health promotion from the perspective of health-care users and health care professionals, no published studies include the simultaneous participation of health-care users, primary health care professionals and key community informants. Understanding the perception of health and health promotion amongst these different stakeholders is crucial for the design and implementation of successful, equitable and sustainable measures that improve the health and wellbeing of populations. Furthermore, the identification of different health assets and deficits by the different informants will generate new evidence to promote healthy behaviours, improve community health and wellbeing and reduce preventable inequalities. The objective of this study is to explore the concept of health and health promotion and to compare health assets and deficits as identified by health-care users, key community informants and primary health care workers with the ultimate purpose to collect the necessary data for the design and implementation of a successful health promotion intervention.

METHODS

A descriptive-interpretive qualitative research was conducted with 276 participants from 14 primary care centres of 7 Spanish regions. Theoretical sampling was used for selection. We organized 11 discussion groups and 2 triangular groups with health-care users; 30 semi-structured interviews with key community informants; and 14 discussion groups with primary health care workers. A thematic content analysis was carried out.

RESULTS

Health-care users and key community informants agree that health is a complex, broad, multifactorial concept that encompasses several interrelated dimensions (physical, psychological-emotional, social, occupational, intellectual, spiritual and environmental). The three participants' profiles consider health promotion indispensable despite defining it as complex and vague. In fact, most health-care users admit to having implemented some change to promote their health. The most powerful motivators to change lifestyles are having a disease, fear of becoming ill and taking care of oneself to maintain health. Health-care users believe that the main difficulties are associated with the physical, social, working and family environment, as well as lack of determination and motivation. They also highlight the need for more information. In relation to the assets and deficits of the neighbourhood, each group identifies those closer to their role.

CONCLUSIONS

Generally, participants showed a holistic and positive concept of health and a more traditional, individual approach to health promotion. We consider therefore crucial to depart from the model of health services that focuses on the individual and the disease toward a socio-ecological health model that substantially increases the participation of health-care users and emphasizes health promotion, wellbeing and community participation.

摘要

背景

虽然有些文章从医疗保健使用者和医疗保健专业人员的角度分析了健康和健康促进的定义,但没有发表的研究同时包括医疗保健使用者、初级卫生保健专业人员和主要社区知情人的参与。了解这些不同利益相关者对健康和健康促进的看法对于设计和实施成功、公平和可持续的措施至关重要,这些措施可以改善人口的健康和福祉。此外,不同的信息提供者对不同的健康资产和缺陷的识别将产生新的证据,以促进健康行为、改善社区健康和福祉以及减少可预防的不平等。本研究的目的是探讨健康和健康促进的概念,并比较医疗保健使用者、主要社区知情人和初级卫生保健工作者确定的健康资产和缺陷,最终目的是收集必要的数据,以设计和实施成功的健康促进干预措施。

方法

采用描述性解释性定性研究,对来自西班牙 7 个地区 14 个初级保健中心的 276 名参与者进行了研究。采用理论抽样进行选择。我们组织了 11 个讨论小组和 2 个三角小组,参与者为医疗保健使用者;对 30 名主要社区知情人进行了 30 次半结构化访谈;对 14 名初级卫生保健工作者进行了 14 次讨论小组。进行了主题内容分析。

结果

医疗保健使用者和主要社区知情人都认为健康是一个复杂、广泛、多因素的概念,包含几个相互关联的维度(身体、心理-情绪、社会、职业、智力、精神和环境)。这三个参与者的概况认为健康促进是不可或缺的,尽管他们将其定义为复杂和模糊的。事实上,大多数医疗保健使用者承认已经采取了一些措施来促进自己的健康。改变生活方式的最强大动力是患有疾病、害怕生病和照顾自己以保持健康。医疗保健使用者认为主要的困难与身体、社会、工作和家庭环境有关,还与缺乏决心和动力有关。他们还强调需要更多的信息。关于邻里的资产和缺陷,每个群体都确定了与他们角色更接近的资产和缺陷。

结论

一般来说,参与者表现出了对健康的整体和积极的概念,以及对健康促进的更传统、个人的方法。因此,我们认为至关重要的是要从关注个体和疾病的卫生服务模式转向社会生态健康模式,大幅增加医疗保健使用者的参与,并强调健康促进、福祉和社区参与。