Lennox Robert J, Falkegård Morten, Vøllestad L Asbjørn, Cooke Steven J, Thorstad Eva B
Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada; Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, P. O. Box 5685, Sluppen, N-7485 Trondheim, Norway.
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Fram Centre, P. O. Box 6606, Langnes, N-9296 Tromsø, Norway.
J Environ Manage. 2016 Jul 1;176:139-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.031. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
Fishing regulations such as harvest restrictions are implemented to limit the exploitation of many fish stocks and ensure the sustainability of fisheries. In Norway, inland recreational fisheries are co-managed by the government and by local riparian rights holders, meaning that Atlantic salmon Salmo salar harvest restrictions differ somewhat among rivers. Data from Norwegian rivers from 2009 to 2013 were used to test for variation in the proportion of salmon released by anglers and the relative size of salmon harvested and released by anglers in rivers that had varying harvest restrictions in terms of quotas, size restrictions, and/or female harvest restrictions. The proportion of the catch released by anglers was higher in rivers where there were harvest restrictions (proportion released = 0.09-0.24) than in rivers with no such restrictions (proportion released = 0.01). On average, salmon released in rivers with size restrictions larger (average mass difference between harvested and released salmon = -1.25 kg) than those released in rivers without harvest restrictions (difference = 0.60 kg). The proportion of the catch released was larger in rivers with seasonal quotas (0.29) than in rivers with daily (0.07) or collective (i.e. total catch for the river; 0.06) quotas. Rivers with low daily (one salmon per angler per day) or seasonal (<5 salmon per angler per year) quotas had a larger proportion of salmon released (0.23, 0.38, respectively) than rivers with moderate (0.10, 0.21) or high (0.07, 0.16) quotas. High seasonal quotas resulted in larger individuals harvested than released (difference = 1.16 kg), on average, compared to moderate (1.22 kg) and high seasonal quotas (-0.30 kg). We conclude that harvest restrictions influenced the extent to which fish were released and thus the stock composition (i.e. size distribution) escaping the recreational fishery with the potential to spawn.
诸如捕捞限制等渔业法规的实施,旨在限制对许多鱼类种群的开发利用,并确保渔业的可持续性。在挪威,内陆休闲渔业由政府和当地河岸权所有者共同管理,这意味着大西洋鲑(Salmo salar)的捕捞限制在不同河流之间略有差异。利用2009年至2013年挪威河流的数据,对在配额、尺寸限制和/或雌性捕捞限制方面具有不同捕捞限制的河流中,垂钓者放生鲑鱼的比例以及垂钓者捕捞和放生鲑鱼的相对大小的变化进行了测试。在有捕捞限制的河流中(放生比例=0.09 - 0.24),垂钓者放生的渔获比例高于没有此类限制的河流(放生比例=0.01)。平均而言,有尺寸限制的河流中放生的鲑鱼比没有捕捞限制的河流中放生的鲑鱼更大(捕捞和放生鲑鱼的平均质量差=-1.25千克);而没有捕捞限制的河流中这一差值为0.60千克。有季节性配额的河流中放生的渔获比例(0.29)高于有每日配额(0.07)或集体配额(即河流的总渔获量;0.06)的河流。每日配额较低(每位垂钓者每天一条鲑鱼)或季节性配额较低(每位垂钓者每年<5条鲑鱼)的河流中,放生鲑鱼的比例(分别为0.23、0.38)高于配额适中(0.10、0.21)或较高(0.07、0.16)的河流。与适中季节性配额(1.22千克)和高季节性配额(-0.30千克)相比,高季节性配额导致捕捞的个体平均比放生的个体更大(差值=1.16千克)。我们得出结论,捕捞限制影响了鱼类被放生的程度,从而影响了逃离休闲渔业且有产卵潜力的种群组成(即大小分布)。